microarray hybridization solution version 2 Search Results


93
GE Healthcare hybridization solution
Hybridization Solution, supplied by GE Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hybridization solution/product/GE Healthcare
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hybridization solution - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CapitalBio Corporation human mrna microarray v2.0
Human Mrna Microarray V2.0, supplied by CapitalBio Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human mrna microarray v2.0/product/CapitalBio Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human mrna microarray v2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human lncrna microarray v2.0
<t>Microarray</t> analysis was applied to detect the lncRNAs and mRNAs in glioma compared to normal peritumoral tissue. A – Differentially expressed lncRNAs were detected in gliomas. A, B – Differentially expressed mRNAs were detected in gliomas. C – Clustering data of lncRNAs in gliomas were analyzed. D – Clustering data of mRNAs in gliomas were analyzed
Human Lncrna Microarray V2.0, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human lncrna microarray v2.0/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human lncrna microarray v2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BlueGnome Limited cytochip v2.0 microarray
Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by <t>microarray</t> using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).
Cytochip V2.0 Microarray, supplied by BlueGnome Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cytochip v2.0 microarray/product/BlueGnome Limited
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cytochip v2.0 microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BlueGnome Limited 24sure microarrays version 2
Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by <t>microarray</t> using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).
24sure Microarrays Version 2, supplied by BlueGnome Limited, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/24sure microarrays version 2/product/BlueGnome Limited
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
24sure microarrays version 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CDI Laboratories human proteome microarray version 2.0
Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by <t>microarray</t> using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).
Human Proteome Microarray Version 2.0, supplied by CDI Laboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human proteome microarray version 2.0/product/CDI Laboratories
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human proteome microarray version 2.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc mouse lncrna microarray v2.0 (8 x 60k)
Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by <t>microarray</t> using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).
Mouse Lncrna Microarray V2.0 (8 X 60k), supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse lncrna microarray v2.0 (8 x 60k)/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse lncrna microarray v2.0 (8 x 60k) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc arraystar lncrna microarray
Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by <t>microarray</t> using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).
Arraystar Lncrna Microarray, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/arraystar lncrna microarray/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arraystar lncrna microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human circrna v2.0 microarray
<t>CircRNA</t> <t>microarray</t> and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant
Human Circrna V2.0 Microarray, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human circrna v2.0 microarray/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human circrna v2.0 microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human circular rna microarray v2.0 chips
<t>CircRNA</t> <t>microarray</t> and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant
Human Circular Rna Microarray V2.0 Chips, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human circular rna microarray v2.0 chips/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human circular rna microarray v2.0 chips - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human gene expression microarray
<t>CircRNA</t> <t>microarray</t> and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant
Human Gene Expression Microarray, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human gene expression microarray/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human gene expression microarray - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Arraystar inc human incrna array v2.0; 8×60k
<t>CircRNA</t> <t>microarray</t> and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant
Human Incrna Array V2.0; 8×60k, supplied by Arraystar inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human incrna array v2.0; 8×60k/product/Arraystar inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human incrna array v2.0; 8×60k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Microarray analysis was applied to detect the lncRNAs and mRNAs in glioma compared to normal peritumoral tissue. A – Differentially expressed lncRNAs were detected in gliomas. A, B – Differentially expressed mRNAs were detected in gliomas. C – Clustering data of lncRNAs in gliomas were analyzed. D – Clustering data of mRNAs in gliomas were analyzed

Journal: Archives of Medical Science : AMS

Article Title: Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is involved in brain glioma development

doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.91290

Figure Lengend Snippet: Microarray analysis was applied to detect the lncRNAs and mRNAs in glioma compared to normal peritumoral tissue. A – Differentially expressed lncRNAs were detected in gliomas. A, B – Differentially expressed mRNAs were detected in gliomas. C – Clustering data of lncRNAs in gliomas were analyzed. D – Clustering data of mRNAs in gliomas were analyzed

Article Snippet: The synthesized cDNAs were labeled and hybridized to Arraystar Human lncRNA Microarray V2.0 (Arraystar, Rockville, MD) containing probes for 33,045 lncRNAs and 30,215 mRNAs identified from both publications and authoritative databases, such as RefSeq, UCSC Knowngenes, and Ensembl.

Techniques: Microarray

Summary of data from  microarray  for three pairs of glioma and adjacent normal tissues

Journal: Archives of Medical Science : AMS

Article Title: Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is involved in brain glioma development

doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.91290

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of data from microarray for three pairs of glioma and adjacent normal tissues

Article Snippet: The synthesized cDNAs were labeled and hybridized to Arraystar Human lncRNA Microarray V2.0 (Arraystar, Rockville, MD) containing probes for 33,045 lncRNAs and 30,215 mRNAs identified from both publications and authoritative databases, such as RefSeq, UCSC Knowngenes, and Ensembl.

Techniques: Microarray, RNA Expression

LncRNA-mRNA co-expression network: nodes with red cycle represent lncRNAs, nodes without cycle represent mRNAs, straight lines represent interactions between genes, purple represents increased expression, and blue represents decreased expression. The size of the node represents the degree; the higher the degree, the more genes interact with the particular node in the network

Journal: Archives of Medical Science : AMS

Article Title: Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is involved in brain glioma development

doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.91290

Figure Lengend Snippet: LncRNA-mRNA co-expression network: nodes with red cycle represent lncRNAs, nodes without cycle represent mRNAs, straight lines represent interactions between genes, purple represents increased expression, and blue represents decreased expression. The size of the node represents the degree; the higher the degree, the more genes interact with the particular node in the network

Article Snippet: The synthesized cDNAs were labeled and hybridized to Arraystar Human lncRNA Microarray V2.0 (Arraystar, Rockville, MD) containing probes for 33,045 lncRNAs and 30,215 mRNAs identified from both publications and authoritative databases, such as RefSeq, UCSC Knowngenes, and Ensembl.

Techniques: Expressing

Degree was used to assess interactions in the lncRNA/mRNA network. This table is a collection of a series of key  lncRNA/mRNAs

Journal: Archives of Medical Science : AMS

Article Title: Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is involved in brain glioma development

doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.91290

Figure Lengend Snippet: Degree was used to assess interactions in the lncRNA/mRNA network. This table is a collection of a series of key lncRNA/mRNAs

Article Snippet: The synthesized cDNAs were labeled and hybridized to Arraystar Human lncRNA Microarray V2.0 (Arraystar, Rockville, MD) containing probes for 33,045 lncRNAs and 30,215 mRNAs identified from both publications and authoritative databases, such as RefSeq, UCSC Knowngenes, and Ensembl.

Techniques:

Comparison of microarray data and qPCR results. A – qPCR was used to verify expression of lncRNAs ak125809, ak098473, uc002ehu.1, bc043564, NR_027322, and uc003qmb.2. B – Distribution of lncRNA expression levels were provided. All six lncRNAs of ak125809, ak098473, uc002ehu.1, bc043564, NR_027322, and uc- 003qmb.2 were validated by qPCR analysis in the 40 paired glioma and peritumoral tissues. Each histogram represents the average fold change (T/N) with logarithmic conversion. Error bars are indicative of standard deviation. Distribution of lncRNA expression

Journal: Archives of Medical Science : AMS

Article Title: Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is involved in brain glioma development

doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.91290

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of microarray data and qPCR results. A – qPCR was used to verify expression of lncRNAs ak125809, ak098473, uc002ehu.1, bc043564, NR_027322, and uc003qmb.2. B – Distribution of lncRNA expression levels were provided. All six lncRNAs of ak125809, ak098473, uc002ehu.1, bc043564, NR_027322, and uc- 003qmb.2 were validated by qPCR analysis in the 40 paired glioma and peritumoral tissues. Each histogram represents the average fold change (T/N) with logarithmic conversion. Error bars are indicative of standard deviation. Distribution of lncRNA expression

Article Snippet: The synthesized cDNAs were labeled and hybridized to Arraystar Human lncRNA Microarray V2.0 (Arraystar, Rockville, MD) containing probes for 33,045 lncRNAs and 30,215 mRNAs identified from both publications and authoritative databases, such as RefSeq, UCSC Knowngenes, and Ensembl.

Techniques: Comparison, Microarray, Expressing, Standard Deviation

Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by microarray using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).

Journal: European Journal of Human Genetics

Article Title: Genomic and clinical characteristics of six patients with partially overlapping interstitial deletions at 10p12p11

doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.71

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic illustration of chromosome 10 displaying the deletions at 10p12p11 in patients 1–6 and patient by Shadadpuri et al5 detected by microarray using the Ensembl browser. Deleted regions for the respective cases are shown as black bars. Smallest region of overlap (SRO) is indicated by vertical dotted lines. Positions are according to NCBI36 (hg18).

Article Snippet: Confirmation of the deletion and parental analysis of patient 5 was carried out by using Cytochip v2.0 microarray (Bluegnome, Cambridge, UK) and data analysis with BlueFuse for Microarrays v.3.5 (Bluegnome, Cambridge, UK).

Techniques: Microarray

CircRNA microarray and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

Article Title: Androgen receptor decreases the renal cell carcinoma bone metastases via suppressing the osteolytic formation through altering a novel circEXOC7 regulatory axis

doi: 10.1002/ctm2.353

Figure Lengend Snippet: CircRNA microarray and screening process. Results from circRNA microarray and bioinformatics analysis from five paired human RCC vs. RBM tissues were summarized in (A‐D). (A) Box plot demonstrated no significant differences in the distribution of intensity across 10 clinical samples. (B) Scatter plot displayed circRNAs expression correlation between RCC and RBM group. (C) Heat map generated from circRNAs microarray data reflecting circRNAs expression values in RCC and RBM groups. (D) Volcano plot showing DERs data. The red points indicate points‐of‐interest that display both large magnitude fold‐changes (x‐axis) and high statistical significance (‐log10 of p ‐value, y‐axis). The green line shows points above the line having p < 0.05 and points below the line having p > 0.05. This plot is colored such that those points having a fold‐change less than 2 (log2 = 1) are shown in gray. (E) The qRT‐PCR was performed to show 32 selected candidate circRNAs expression levels in cells. (F) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 cells to show effects of manipulating efficiency of selected candidate circRNAs, ciR4#, ciR6#, ciR19#, and ciR26#. (G‐J) Interruption assays revealed that suppressing (G) ciR‐4# (hsa_circ_0001275), (H) ciR‐6# (hsa_circRNA_405974), expression cannot reverse/block the knocked‐down AR‐increased osteolytic formation in SW839 cells (scale bars, 200 μm), increasing (I) ciR‐19# (hsa_circ_0091743) expression, and (J) increasing ciR‐26# hsa_circ_0075303 expression cannot reverse/block the AR‐suppressed osteolytic formation in SW839 cell line (scale bars, 200 μm). For (E‐J), quantitation is at the right, and data are presented as Mean ± SD, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Article Snippet: In the current study, five human RCC and five RCC bone metastasis tissues were deeply sequenced using Arraystar human circRNA V2.0 microarray.

Techniques: Microarray, Expressing, Generated, Quantitative RT-PCR, Blocking Assay, Quantitation Assay

The expression of circEXOC7 is regulated by DHX9. (A) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cell lines to show correlation between AR and four genes related to circRNA biogenesis. Among them, ADAR2 and DHX9 have a positive correlation with AR mRNA expression. (B and C) The qRT‐qPCR was performed to show (B) knocking down DHX9, and not (C) ADAR2 gene, led to increased circEXOC7 expression in SW839 cells. (D) WB was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cells to show that modulated AR expression also altered DHX9 expression. (E) Predicted AR binding sites on the DHX9 promoter region using website http://jaspar.genereg.net/ . (F) ChIP assay showing AR could bind to the No. 2 potential ARE on the DHX9 5′‐promoter region. (G) The wild type and mutant pGL3‐DHX9 promoter reporter constructs. (H and I) Luciferase activity after transfection of wild type or mutant DHX9 promoter reporter constructs in OS‐RC‐2 cells (H) transfected with AR‐cDNA or pWPI and SW839 cells (I) transfected with AR‐shRNA or pLKO. For (B and C), (H and I), data are presented as Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

Article Title: Androgen receptor decreases the renal cell carcinoma bone metastases via suppressing the osteolytic formation through altering a novel circEXOC7 regulatory axis

doi: 10.1002/ctm2.353

Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of circEXOC7 is regulated by DHX9. (A) The qRT‐PCR was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cell lines to show correlation between AR and four genes related to circRNA biogenesis. Among them, ADAR2 and DHX9 have a positive correlation with AR mRNA expression. (B and C) The qRT‐qPCR was performed to show (B) knocking down DHX9, and not (C) ADAR2 gene, led to increased circEXOC7 expression in SW839 cells. (D) WB was performed on SW839 and OS‐RC‐2 cells to show that modulated AR expression also altered DHX9 expression. (E) Predicted AR binding sites on the DHX9 promoter region using website http://jaspar.genereg.net/ . (F) ChIP assay showing AR could bind to the No. 2 potential ARE on the DHX9 5′‐promoter region. (G) The wild type and mutant pGL3‐DHX9 promoter reporter constructs. (H and I) Luciferase activity after transfection of wild type or mutant DHX9 promoter reporter constructs in OS‐RC‐2 cells (H) transfected with AR‐cDNA or pWPI and SW839 cells (I) transfected with AR‐shRNA or pLKO. For (B and C), (H and I), data are presented as Mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Abbreviation: N.S., not significant

Article Snippet: In the current study, five human RCC and five RCC bone metastasis tissues were deeply sequenced using Arraystar human circRNA V2.0 microarray.

Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Construct, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Transfection, shRNA