irf3 Search Results


90
Novus Biologicals mouse monoclonal igg1 anti irf3
Mouse Monoclonal Igg1 Anti Irf3, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/IRF3+Antibody+(3F10)+-+BSA+Free/bio_rxiv__2020__03__19__994988-198-176-181
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal igg1 anti irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti phirf3
Anti Phirf3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/Phospho-IRF-3+(Ser396)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc12998009-46-11-12
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti phirf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc 647 conjugated antibodies
647 Conjugated Antibodies, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/Phospho-IRF-3+(Ser396)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc09822952-215-4-10
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
647 conjugated antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho irf3
Phospho Irf3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/Phospho-IRF-3+(Ser396)+Rabbit+mAb/pm31061008-87-7-13
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho irf 3 ser396 d6o1m rabbit mab
Phospho Irf 3 Ser396 D6o1m Rabbit Mab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/Phospho-IRF-3+(Ser396)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc12055552-146-97-104
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho irf 3 ser396 d6o1m rabbit mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse phospho s379 irf3
M04 induces canonical activation of <t>IRF3</t> which is essential to reporter signal generated by the compound. (A) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of TBK1 Ser172 and IRF3 Ser386 as well as corresponding total protein levels in MM6 cells (left) and THF (right) exposed for 4 h to 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, or 1,000 HAU/mL SeV as indicated; (B) Indirect immunofluorescence showing subcellular localization of IRF3 in THF exposed for 4 h to 1% DMSO, transfected 2'3'cGAMP (10 μg/mL), 100 ng/mL TNFα, or 50 μM M04; (C) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, or 50 μM M04 in parental cells as well as those from which IRF3 was deleted as indicated. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells based on quadruplicate measurements. Student's T -test was used to compare RLU in the parental and ΔIRF3 cells ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Mouse Phospho S379 Irf3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/Phospho-IRF-3+(Ser379)+Rabbit+mAb/pmc07360819-226-34-38
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse phospho s379 irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p irf3
RIG-I depletion can restore the phenotype of YTHDF2 deficiency in bladder carcinoma cells. A–D, Effects of knockdown ( A , C, and D ) or knockout ( B ) of either YTHDF2 or DDX58 , or both YTHDF2 and RIG-I in SW780 cells on cell viability measured by CCK-8 assays ( A ), cell proliferation analyzed by colony formation assays ( B ), the percentage of cells in S-phase determined by EdU assays ( C ), and relative cell death calculated by LDH release ( D ). E–G, Tumor size and weight of subcutaneous tumors from the indicated groups. H, H&E staining and sizes of tumors generated by Ddx58 KO and control MB49 cells implanted in mouse bladder lumen. I, A schematic model of signaling mediated by YTHDF2 in tumorigenesis of bladder carcinoma cells. YTHDF2 high-expressing cells fail to activate the type I IFN response and to suppress cell death. RIG-I detects and binds cytosolic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) by its DExD/H-box domain, then opens its auto-repressed conformation, and recruits to the CARD domain of the MAVS, which induces phosphorylation of TBK1, <t>IRF3,</t> and IRF7, leading to the production of type I IFNs and cell death. In YTHDF2 high-expressing bladder carcinoma cells, excessive YTHDF2 binds to m 6 A modified RIG-I mRNA, which promotes RIG-I mRNA degradation, therefore, causing a decrease in RIGI-I protein expression level in the cell. Cytosolic dsRNA cannot be effectively recognized by the low-level RIG-I protein, thus weakening the activation of IFNI signaling and promoting bladder carcinoma tumorigenesis. Data in A–D are presented as the means ± SEM. Data in F and G are presented as the means ± SD of the experiment with 5 mice per group. P values in A–D, F, and G were calculated using the Student t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
P Irf3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/Phospho-IRF-3+(Ser386)+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pmc10236158-75-22-25
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc irf3
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 inhibits CGAS-STING1-mediated IFN production. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to analyze IFNB1 mRNA levels in HEK293T cells co-transfected with SARS-CoV-2 HA-NSP or HA-vector plasmid, along with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1 for 24 h, and the findings were compared with those of the HA-vector control. (B) Luciferase reporter assays were carried out in HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with SARS-CoV-2 NSP-expressing plasmid or control plasmid for 24 h. Statistical significance values were determined by comparing the results with those of the HA-vector control. (C) Luciferase reporter assays from HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg, respectively) for 24 h. (D – F) the mRNA levels of IFNB1 (D), ISG15 (E), and IFIT1 (F) were determined by RT-qPCR in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid, for 24 h. (G) the phosphorylation levels of TBK1 and <t>IRF3</t> were determined by immunoblotting in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with HA-NSP6-expressing plasmid or HA-vector for 24 h (left). Band intensities were determined by ImageJ software (right). (H) the localization of IRF3 was checked by immunofluorescence microscopy in HEK293T cells co-transfected
Irf3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/IRF-3+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pm37482689-289-9-32
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti phos pho irf3 rabbit monoclonal antibody
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 inhibits CGAS-STING1-mediated IFN production. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to analyze IFNB1 mRNA levels in HEK293T cells co-transfected with SARS-CoV-2 HA-NSP or HA-vector plasmid, along with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1 for 24 h, and the findings were compared with those of the HA-vector control. (B) Luciferase reporter assays were carried out in HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with SARS-CoV-2 NSP-expressing plasmid or control plasmid for 24 h. Statistical significance values were determined by comparing the results with those of the HA-vector control. (C) Luciferase reporter assays from HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg, respectively) for 24 h. (D – F) the mRNA levels of IFNB1 (D), ISG15 (E), and IFIT1 (F) were determined by RT-qPCR in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid, for 24 h. (G) the phosphorylation levels of TBK1 and <t>IRF3</t> were determined by immunoblotting in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with HA-NSP6-expressing plasmid or HA-vector for 24 h (left). Band intensities were determined by ImageJ software (right). (H) the localization of IRF3 was checked by immunofluorescence microscopy in HEK293T cells co-transfected
Anti Phos Pho Irf3 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/IRF-3+Rabbit+mAb/pm41931065-76-4-21
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti phos pho irf3 rabbit monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech irf3
USP20 attenuates inflammatory response via modulation of the STING signaling pathway. (A, B) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, <t>IRF3,</t> and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (A) and the statistical results, data has been normalized against GAPDH (B). n = 5. (C) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (D, E) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3 and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (D) and the statistical results, data have been normalized against GAPDH (E). n = 5. (F) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (G) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in heart tissues of USP20 fl/fl non‐diabetic controls, USP20 conditional knockout (CKO) non‐diabetic controls, USP20 fl/fl diabetic mice, and USP20 CKO diabetic mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05, p > 0.05, ns: No differences. n : The number of independent biological replicates.
Irf3, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/IRF3+Antibody/pmc12872204-85-39-41
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
irf3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti sting
USP20 attenuates inflammatory response via modulation of the STING signaling pathway. (A, B) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, <t>IRF3,</t> and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (A) and the statistical results, data has been normalized against GAPDH (B). n = 5. (C) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (D, E) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3 and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (D) and the statistical results, data have been normalized against GAPDH (E). n = 5. (F) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (G) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in heart tissues of USP20 fl/fl non‐diabetic controls, USP20 conditional knockout (CKO) non‐diabetic controls, USP20 fl/fl diabetic mice, and USP20 CKO diabetic mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05, p > 0.05, ns: No differences. n : The number of independent biological replicates.
Anti Sting, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/TMEM173%2FSTING+Antibody/pmc13024547-72-28-30
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti sting - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology irf
USP20 attenuates inflammatory response via modulation of the STING signaling pathway. (A, B) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, <t>IRF3,</t> and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (A) and the statistical results, data has been normalized against GAPDH (B). n = 5. (C) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (D, E) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3 and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (D) and the statistical results, data have been normalized against GAPDH (E). n = 5. (F) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (G) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in heart tissues of USP20 fl/fl non‐diabetic controls, USP20 conditional knockout (CKO) non‐diabetic controls, USP20 fl/fl diabetic mice, and USP20 CKO diabetic mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05, p > 0.05, ns: No differences. n : The number of independent biological replicates.
Irf, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/irf3/IRF-3+Antibody/10__1074_slash_jbc__m400938200-67-8-4
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
irf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


M04 induces canonical activation of IRF3 which is essential to reporter signal generated by the compound. (A) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of TBK1 Ser172 and IRF3 Ser386 as well as corresponding total protein levels in MM6 cells (left) and THF (right) exposed for 4 h to 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, or 1,000 HAU/mL SeV as indicated; (B) Indirect immunofluorescence showing subcellular localization of IRF3 in THF exposed for 4 h to 1% DMSO, transfected 2'3'cGAMP (10 μg/mL), 100 ng/mL TNFα, or 50 μM M04; (C) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, or 50 μM M04 in parental cells as well as those from which IRF3 was deleted as indicated. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells based on quadruplicate measurements. Student's T -test was used to compare RLU in the parental and ΔIRF3 cells ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Characterization of a Novel Compound That Stimulates STING-Mediated Innate Immune Activity in an Allele-Specific Manner

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01430

Figure Lengend Snippet: M04 induces canonical activation of IRF3 which is essential to reporter signal generated by the compound. (A) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of TBK1 Ser172 and IRF3 Ser386 as well as corresponding total protein levels in MM6 cells (left) and THF (right) exposed for 4 h to 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, or 1,000 HAU/mL SeV as indicated; (B) Indirect immunofluorescence showing subcellular localization of IRF3 in THF exposed for 4 h to 1% DMSO, transfected 2'3'cGAMP (10 μg/mL), 100 ng/mL TNFα, or 50 μM M04; (C) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, or 50 μM M04 in parental cells as well as those from which IRF3 was deleted as indicated. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells based on quadruplicate measurements. Student's T -test was used to compare RLU in the parental and ΔIRF3 cells ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Sources and concentrations of antibodies used against the following antigens are indicated in parentheses: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (SC-51906; Santa Cruz) (1:10,000), IRF3 (4302; Cell Signaling), human phospho-IRF3 (76493; Abcam), mouse IRF3 (SC-9082; Santa Cruz), mouse phospho-S379 IRF3 (79945S; Cell Signaling), mouse phospho-S396 IRF3 (29047S; Cell Signaling), STING (13647S; Cell Signaling), phospho-S366 STING (19781S; Cell Signaling), TBK1 (3504S; Cell Signaling), phospho-TBK1 (5483S; Cell Signaling), NF-kB P65 (SC372; Santa Cruz), NF-kB P50 (3035; Cell Signaling), GM-130 (610823; BD Biosciences).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Generated, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Immunofluorescence, Transfection, Reporter Assay

Innate Activation by M04 requires STING but not MAVS, TRIF, or cytosolic DNA PRRs. (A) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in THF-ISRE-ΔMAVS/TRIF following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, transfected cGAMP (10 μg/mL), or 75 μM M04. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells as the basis ( n = 4 treatments); (B) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386, total IRF3, and GAPDH in THF-ISRE-ΔMAVS/TRIF following 8 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 75 μM M04, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV or 25 μM ABZI as indicated; (C) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in THF-ISRE-ΔSTING following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, or 75 μM M04. Data presented are mean RLU ± SD as described above; Student's T -test was used to compare RLU *** p < 0.001; (D) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386, total IRF3 in THF-ISRE-ΔSTING following 4 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV or 25 μM ABZI as indicated; (E) Secretion of bioactive type I IFN from parental THF as well as THF-ISRE-ΔMAVS/TRIF and THF-ISRE-ΔSTING treated in triplicate overnight with 1% DMSO, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, transfected cGAMP (10 μg/mL), or 75 μM M04. Data are expressed as mean concentrations ± SD for IFNβ equivalent units. Statistical significance between treated and untreated cells of similar genetic background was calculated using Student's T -test. **** p < 0.0001; (F) Reporter assay from WT parental THF-ISRE cells as well as from cells from which indicated dsDNA-specific PRRs were deleted. Values presented are mean fold changes ± SD for duplicates relative to the value for DMSO-treated cells.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Characterization of a Novel Compound That Stimulates STING-Mediated Innate Immune Activity in an Allele-Specific Manner

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01430

Figure Lengend Snippet: Innate Activation by M04 requires STING but not MAVS, TRIF, or cytosolic DNA PRRs. (A) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in THF-ISRE-ΔMAVS/TRIF following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, transfected cGAMP (10 μg/mL), or 75 μM M04. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells as the basis ( n = 4 treatments); (B) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386, total IRF3, and GAPDH in THF-ISRE-ΔMAVS/TRIF following 8 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 75 μM M04, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV or 25 μM ABZI as indicated; (C) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in THF-ISRE-ΔSTING following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, or 75 μM M04. Data presented are mean RLU ± SD as described above; Student's T -test was used to compare RLU *** p < 0.001; (D) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386, total IRF3 in THF-ISRE-ΔSTING following 4 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV or 25 μM ABZI as indicated; (E) Secretion of bioactive type I IFN from parental THF as well as THF-ISRE-ΔMAVS/TRIF and THF-ISRE-ΔSTING treated in triplicate overnight with 1% DMSO, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, transfected cGAMP (10 μg/mL), or 75 μM M04. Data are expressed as mean concentrations ± SD for IFNβ equivalent units. Statistical significance between treated and untreated cells of similar genetic background was calculated using Student's T -test. **** p < 0.0001; (F) Reporter assay from WT parental THF-ISRE cells as well as from cells from which indicated dsDNA-specific PRRs were deleted. Values presented are mean fold changes ± SD for duplicates relative to the value for DMSO-treated cells.

Article Snippet: Sources and concentrations of antibodies used against the following antigens are indicated in parentheses: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (SC-51906; Santa Cruz) (1:10,000), IRF3 (4302; Cell Signaling), human phospho-IRF3 (76493; Abcam), mouse IRF3 (SC-9082; Santa Cruz), mouse phospho-S379 IRF3 (79945S; Cell Signaling), mouse phospho-S396 IRF3 (29047S; Cell Signaling), STING (13647S; Cell Signaling), phospho-S366 STING (19781S; Cell Signaling), TBK1 (3504S; Cell Signaling), phospho-TBK1 (5483S; Cell Signaling), NF-kB P65 (SC372; Santa Cruz), NF-kB P50 (3035; Cell Signaling), GM-130 (610823; BD Biosciences).

Techniques: Activation Assay, Reporter Assay, Transfection, Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics

Responsiveness to M04 can be Conferred through Introduction of WT STING Allelic Variant. (A) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in THP-1-ISG-Lucia following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 75 μM TRIF agonist AV-C, 25 μM ABZI, or 75 μM M04. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells as the basis ( n = 4 treatments). Student's T -test was used to compare RLU *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; (B) lmmunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386 and total IRF3 in THP-1 whole cell lysates following 4 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, 25 μM ABZI, or 10 μg/mL cGAMP as indicated; (C) lmmunoblot showing expression of endogenous or ectopically expressed WT hSTING in THP-1 as indicated. (D) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386 in THP-1 cells from which endogenous STING was deleted and WT STING stably introduced following indicated treatment as described above.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Characterization of a Novel Compound That Stimulates STING-Mediated Innate Immune Activity in an Allele-Specific Manner

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01430

Figure Lengend Snippet: Responsiveness to M04 can be Conferred through Introduction of WT STING Allelic Variant. (A) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in THP-1-ISG-Lucia following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, 1,000 U/mL IFNβ, 75 μM TRIF agonist AV-C, 25 μM ABZI, or 75 μM M04. Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells as the basis ( n = 4 treatments). Student's T -test was used to compare RLU *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; (B) lmmunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386 and total IRF3 in THP-1 whole cell lysates following 4 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 50 μM M04, 1,000 HAU/mL SeV, 25 μM ABZI, or 10 μg/mL cGAMP as indicated; (C) lmmunoblot showing expression of endogenous or ectopically expressed WT hSTING in THP-1 as indicated. (D) Immunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser386 in THP-1 cells from which endogenous STING was deleted and WT STING stably introduced following indicated treatment as described above.

Article Snippet: Sources and concentrations of antibodies used against the following antigens are indicated in parentheses: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (SC-51906; Santa Cruz) (1:10,000), IRF3 (4302; Cell Signaling), human phospho-IRF3 (76493; Abcam), mouse IRF3 (SC-9082; Santa Cruz), mouse phospho-S379 IRF3 (79945S; Cell Signaling), mouse phospho-S396 IRF3 (29047S; Cell Signaling), STING (13647S; Cell Signaling), phospho-S366 STING (19781S; Cell Signaling), TBK1 (3504S; Cell Signaling), phospho-TBK1 (5483S; Cell Signaling), NF-kB P65 (SC372; Santa Cruz), NF-kB P50 (3035; Cell Signaling), GM-130 (610823; BD Biosciences).

Techniques: Variant Assay, Reporter Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Expressing, Western Blot, Stable Transfection

Transient transfection of vectors encoding WT and R232H but not HAQ hSTING confer responsiveness to M04. (A) lmmunoblot from HEK293T whole cell lysates showing expression of indicated STING variants following transient transfection, S386 phosphorylation status of IRF3 and total IRF3. Cells were left untreated or exposed to 75 μM M04, 100 nM diABZI, or 10 μg/mL cGAMP as indicated; (B) Reporter assay using cells ( n = 4) treated as described in (A) . Values displayed are mean fold changes ± SD relative to cells transfected with empty vector; (C) Expression of IFIT1 and Viperin mRNA as determined by qPCR in parental A549 cells as well as those transduced with hSTING following treatment with 1% DMSO or 75 μM M04. Data are mean fodl changes ± SD relative to DMSO-treated cells based on duplicates; (D) Synthesis of cGAMP by A549-hSTING cells as determined by ELISA following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, HCMV, or M04. Data presented are mean pg/mL ± SD based on duplicate samples. Student's T -test was used to compare RLU and mRNA levels *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Characterization of a Novel Compound That Stimulates STING-Mediated Innate Immune Activity in an Allele-Specific Manner

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01430

Figure Lengend Snippet: Transient transfection of vectors encoding WT and R232H but not HAQ hSTING confer responsiveness to M04. (A) lmmunoblot from HEK293T whole cell lysates showing expression of indicated STING variants following transient transfection, S386 phosphorylation status of IRF3 and total IRF3. Cells were left untreated or exposed to 75 μM M04, 100 nM diABZI, or 10 μg/mL cGAMP as indicated; (B) Reporter assay using cells ( n = 4) treated as described in (A) . Values displayed are mean fold changes ± SD relative to cells transfected with empty vector; (C) Expression of IFIT1 and Viperin mRNA as determined by qPCR in parental A549 cells as well as those transduced with hSTING following treatment with 1% DMSO or 75 μM M04. Data are mean fodl changes ± SD relative to DMSO-treated cells based on duplicates; (D) Synthesis of cGAMP by A549-hSTING cells as determined by ELISA following overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, HCMV, or M04. Data presented are mean pg/mL ± SD based on duplicate samples. Student's T -test was used to compare RLU and mRNA levels *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Sources and concentrations of antibodies used against the following antigens are indicated in parentheses: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (SC-51906; Santa Cruz) (1:10,000), IRF3 (4302; Cell Signaling), human phospho-IRF3 (76493; Abcam), mouse IRF3 (SC-9082; Santa Cruz), mouse phospho-S379 IRF3 (79945S; Cell Signaling), mouse phospho-S396 IRF3 (29047S; Cell Signaling), STING (13647S; Cell Signaling), phospho-S366 STING (19781S; Cell Signaling), TBK1 (3504S; Cell Signaling), phospho-TBK1 (5483S; Cell Signaling), NF-kB P65 (SC372; Santa Cruz), NF-kB P50 (3035; Cell Signaling), GM-130 (610823; BD Biosciences).

Techniques: Transfection, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Reporter Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Transduction, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Responsiveness to M04 can be conferred to murine cells by ectopic expression of human STING-WT variant. (A) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in RAW264.7-ISG-Lucia cells followni g overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 160 HAU/mL SeV, 25 μM DMXAA, or 75 μM M04.Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells as the basis ( n = 4 treatments); (B) qPCR examining in vivo ISG induction following IP injection of DMXAA or M04; (C) lmmunoblot showing expression of endogenous or ectopically expressed hSTING-WT in RAW264.7 cells as indicated; (D) lmmunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser379 and Ser396 as well as total IRF3 in RAW264.7-hSTING cells following 4 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 75 μM M04, 160 HAU/mL SeV, or transfection of cGAMP as indicated; (E) qPCR examining transcription of IFIT1 or Viperin following overnight treatment of parental RAW264.7 and RAW264.7-hSTING cells with 75 μM M04 ( n = 3). Data presented are mean fold changes ± SD of mRNA relative to cells treated with 1% DMSO.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Characterization of a Novel Compound That Stimulates STING-Mediated Innate Immune Activity in an Allele-Specific Manner

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01430

Figure Lengend Snippet: Responsiveness to M04 can be conferred to murine cells by ectopic expression of human STING-WT variant. (A) Reporter assay illustrating IFN-dependent LUC induction in RAW264.7-ISG-Lucia cells followni g overnight treatment with 1% DMSO, 160 HAU/mL SeV, 25 μM DMXAA, or 75 μM M04.Data presented are mean ± SD relative luminescence units (RLU) using signal from DMSO-treated cells as the basis ( n = 4 treatments); (B) qPCR examining in vivo ISG induction following IP injection of DMXAA or M04; (C) lmmunoblot showing expression of endogenous or ectopically expressed hSTING-WT in RAW264.7 cells as indicated; (D) lmmunoblot showing phosphorylation status of IRF3 Ser379 and Ser396 as well as total IRF3 in RAW264.7-hSTING cells following 4 h treatment with 1% DMSO, 75 μM M04, 160 HAU/mL SeV, or transfection of cGAMP as indicated; (E) qPCR examining transcription of IFIT1 or Viperin following overnight treatment of parental RAW264.7 and RAW264.7-hSTING cells with 75 μM M04 ( n = 3). Data presented are mean fold changes ± SD of mRNA relative to cells treated with 1% DMSO.

Article Snippet: Sources and concentrations of antibodies used against the following antigens are indicated in parentheses: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (SC-51906; Santa Cruz) (1:10,000), IRF3 (4302; Cell Signaling), human phospho-IRF3 (76493; Abcam), mouse IRF3 (SC-9082; Santa Cruz), mouse phospho-S379 IRF3 (79945S; Cell Signaling), mouse phospho-S396 IRF3 (29047S; Cell Signaling), STING (13647S; Cell Signaling), phospho-S366 STING (19781S; Cell Signaling), TBK1 (3504S; Cell Signaling), phospho-TBK1 (5483S; Cell Signaling), NF-kB P65 (SC372; Santa Cruz), NF-kB P50 (3035; Cell Signaling), GM-130 (610823; BD Biosciences).

Techniques: Expressing, Variant Assay, Reporter Assay, In Vivo, Injection, Phospho-proteomics, Transfection

RIG-I depletion can restore the phenotype of YTHDF2 deficiency in bladder carcinoma cells. A–D, Effects of knockdown ( A , C, and D ) or knockout ( B ) of either YTHDF2 or DDX58 , or both YTHDF2 and RIG-I in SW780 cells on cell viability measured by CCK-8 assays ( A ), cell proliferation analyzed by colony formation assays ( B ), the percentage of cells in S-phase determined by EdU assays ( C ), and relative cell death calculated by LDH release ( D ). E–G, Tumor size and weight of subcutaneous tumors from the indicated groups. H, H&E staining and sizes of tumors generated by Ddx58 KO and control MB49 cells implanted in mouse bladder lumen. I, A schematic model of signaling mediated by YTHDF2 in tumorigenesis of bladder carcinoma cells. YTHDF2 high-expressing cells fail to activate the type I IFN response and to suppress cell death. RIG-I detects and binds cytosolic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) by its DExD/H-box domain, then opens its auto-repressed conformation, and recruits to the CARD domain of the MAVS, which induces phosphorylation of TBK1, IRF3, and IRF7, leading to the production of type I IFNs and cell death. In YTHDF2 high-expressing bladder carcinoma cells, excessive YTHDF2 binds to m 6 A modified RIG-I mRNA, which promotes RIG-I mRNA degradation, therefore, causing a decrease in RIGI-I protein expression level in the cell. Cytosolic dsRNA cannot be effectively recognized by the low-level RIG-I protein, thus weakening the activation of IFNI signaling and promoting bladder carcinoma tumorigenesis. Data in A–D are presented as the means ± SEM. Data in F and G are presented as the means ± SD of the experiment with 5 mice per group. P values in A–D, F, and G were calculated using the Student t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Journal: Cancer Research

Article Title: The m 6 A Reader YTHDF2 Promotes Bladder Cancer Progression by Suppressing RIG-I–Mediated Immune Response

doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-2485

Figure Lengend Snippet: RIG-I depletion can restore the phenotype of YTHDF2 deficiency in bladder carcinoma cells. A–D, Effects of knockdown ( A , C, and D ) or knockout ( B ) of either YTHDF2 or DDX58 , or both YTHDF2 and RIG-I in SW780 cells on cell viability measured by CCK-8 assays ( A ), cell proliferation analyzed by colony formation assays ( B ), the percentage of cells in S-phase determined by EdU assays ( C ), and relative cell death calculated by LDH release ( D ). E–G, Tumor size and weight of subcutaneous tumors from the indicated groups. H, H&E staining and sizes of tumors generated by Ddx58 KO and control MB49 cells implanted in mouse bladder lumen. I, A schematic model of signaling mediated by YTHDF2 in tumorigenesis of bladder carcinoma cells. YTHDF2 high-expressing cells fail to activate the type I IFN response and to suppress cell death. RIG-I detects and binds cytosolic double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) by its DExD/H-box domain, then opens its auto-repressed conformation, and recruits to the CARD domain of the MAVS, which induces phosphorylation of TBK1, IRF3, and IRF7, leading to the production of type I IFNs and cell death. In YTHDF2 high-expressing bladder carcinoma cells, excessive YTHDF2 binds to m 6 A modified RIG-I mRNA, which promotes RIG-I mRNA degradation, therefore, causing a decrease in RIGI-I protein expression level in the cell. Cytosolic dsRNA cannot be effectively recognized by the low-level RIG-I protein, thus weakening the activation of IFNI signaling and promoting bladder carcinoma tumorigenesis. Data in A–D are presented as the means ± SEM. Data in F and G are presented as the means ± SD of the experiment with 5 mice per group. P values in A–D, F, and G were calculated using the Student t test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

Article Snippet: The following primary antibodies were used in this study: YTHDF2 (1:2,000, 24744–1-AP, Proteintech; RRID: AB_2687435), RIG-I (1:2,000, D261405; Sangon Biotech, RRID: AB_2537772), p-IRF3 (1:1,000, 37829; Cell Signaling Technology, RRID: AB_2799121), p-TBK1 (1:1,000, 5483; Cell Signaling Technology, RRID: AB_10693472), Flag (1:4,000, 80010–1-RR, Proteintech, RRID: AB_2882940), β-actin (1:10,000, RM2001, RayBiotech, RRID: AB_2756462), and GAPDH (1:20,000, 60004–1-Ig, Proteintech, RRID: AB_2107436).

Techniques: Knockdown, Knock-Out, CCK-8 Assay, Staining, Generated, Control, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Modification, Activation Assay

Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 inhibits CGAS-STING1-mediated IFN production. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to analyze IFNB1 mRNA levels in HEK293T cells co-transfected with SARS-CoV-2 HA-NSP or HA-vector plasmid, along with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1 for 24 h, and the findings were compared with those of the HA-vector control. (B) Luciferase reporter assays were carried out in HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with SARS-CoV-2 NSP-expressing plasmid or control plasmid for 24 h. Statistical significance values were determined by comparing the results with those of the HA-vector control. (C) Luciferase reporter assays from HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg, respectively) for 24 h. (D – F) the mRNA levels of IFNB1 (D), ISG15 (E), and IFIT1 (F) were determined by RT-qPCR in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid, for 24 h. (G) the phosphorylation levels of TBK1 and IRF3 were determined by immunoblotting in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with HA-NSP6-expressing plasmid or HA-vector for 24 h (left). Band intensities were determined by ImageJ software (right). (H) the localization of IRF3 was checked by immunofluorescence microscopy in HEK293T cells co-transfected

Journal: Autophagy

Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural protein 6 triggers endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced autophagy to degrade STING1.

doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2238579

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 inhibits CGAS-STING1-mediated IFN production. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR was performed to analyze IFNB1 mRNA levels in HEK293T cells co-transfected with SARS-CoV-2 HA-NSP or HA-vector plasmid, along with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1 for 24 h, and the findings were compared with those of the HA-vector control. (B) Luciferase reporter assays were carried out in HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with SARS-CoV-2 NSP-expressing plasmid or control plasmid for 24 h. Statistical significance values were determined by comparing the results with those of the HA-vector control. (C) Luciferase reporter assays from HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 firefly luciferase reporter plasmid, stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg, respectively) for 24 h. (D – F) the mRNA levels of IFNB1 (D), ISG15 (E), and IFIT1 (F) were determined by RT-qPCR in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with different doses of NSP6-expressing plasmid, for 24 h. (G) the phosphorylation levels of TBK1 and IRF3 were determined by immunoblotting in HEK293T cells co-transfected with stimulator plasmids Flag-CGAS and MYC-STING1, along with HA-NSP6-expressing plasmid or HA-vector for 24 h (left). Band intensities were determined by ImageJ software (right). (H) the localization of IRF3 was checked by immunofluorescence microscopy in HEK293T cells co-transfected

Article Snippet: Rabbit monoclonal antibody against TBK1 (38066), phosphoTBK1/NAK (Ser172) (5483), IRF3 (11904), phospho-IRF3 (Ser396) (4947), Flag (14793), MYC-Tag (2276), HA-Tag (2367), GFP (2955), RETREG1/FAM134B (61011), CCPG1 (80158), and GAPDH (97166) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Luciferase, Expressing, Phospho-proteomics, Western Blot, Software, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy

Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 promotes the lysosomal degradation of STING1. (A – D) Luciferase reporter assays in HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 Luc reporter plasmid together with HA-vector or HA-NSP6 in the presence or absence of CGAS (A), STING1 (B), TBK1 (C), or IRF3 (D) for 24 h. (E) Colocalization of NSP6 with STING1, CGAS, TBK1, or IRF3 was assessed by confocal microscopy in HEK293T cells co-transfected with GFP-NSP6 and MYC-STING1, Flag-CGAS, Flag-TBK1, or Flag- IRF3. Cells were fixed at 24 h after transfection and probed with Flag antibody (red) (left). Confocal images were analyzed for colocalization using ImageJ software (right). Scale bars: 5 µm. (F) the STING1 levels were determined by immunoblotting in HEK293T cells co-transfected with MYC-STING1 (0.5 μg) plasmid and increasing amounts of HA-NSP6-expressing plasmid (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg, respectively) for 24 h (left). Band intensities were determined by ImageJ software (right). (G) the expression of endogenous STING1 protein was determined by immunoblotting in HeLa cells (expressing endogenous CGAS and STING1) transfected with different

Journal: Autophagy

Article Title: SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural protein 6 triggers endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced autophagy to degrade STING1.

doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2238579

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. SARS-CoV-2 NSP6 promotes the lysosomal degradation of STING1. (A – D) Luciferase reporter assays in HEK293T cells co-transfected with IFNB1 Luc reporter plasmid together with HA-vector or HA-NSP6 in the presence or absence of CGAS (A), STING1 (B), TBK1 (C), or IRF3 (D) for 24 h. (E) Colocalization of NSP6 with STING1, CGAS, TBK1, or IRF3 was assessed by confocal microscopy in HEK293T cells co-transfected with GFP-NSP6 and MYC-STING1, Flag-CGAS, Flag-TBK1, or Flag- IRF3. Cells were fixed at 24 h after transfection and probed with Flag antibody (red) (left). Confocal images were analyzed for colocalization using ImageJ software (right). Scale bars: 5 µm. (F) the STING1 levels were determined by immunoblotting in HEK293T cells co-transfected with MYC-STING1 (0.5 μg) plasmid and increasing amounts of HA-NSP6-expressing plasmid (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 μg, respectively) for 24 h (left). Band intensities were determined by ImageJ software (right). (G) the expression of endogenous STING1 protein was determined by immunoblotting in HeLa cells (expressing endogenous CGAS and STING1) transfected with different

Article Snippet: Rabbit monoclonal antibody against TBK1 (38066), phosphoTBK1/NAK (Ser172) (5483), IRF3 (11904), phospho-IRF3 (Ser396) (4947), Flag (14793), MYC-Tag (2276), HA-Tag (2367), GFP (2955), RETREG1/FAM134B (61011), CCPG1 (80158), and GAPDH (97166) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology.

Techniques: Luciferase, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Confocal Microscopy, Software, Western Blot, Expressing

USP20 attenuates inflammatory response via modulation of the STING signaling pathway. (A, B) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3, and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (A) and the statistical results, data has been normalized against GAPDH (B). n = 5. (C) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (D, E) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3 and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (D) and the statistical results, data have been normalized against GAPDH (E). n = 5. (F) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (G) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in heart tissues of USP20 fl/fl non‐diabetic controls, USP20 conditional knockout (CKO) non‐diabetic controls, USP20 fl/fl diabetic mice, and USP20 CKO diabetic mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05, p > 0.05, ns: No differences. n : The number of independent biological replicates.

Journal: The FASEB Journal

Article Title: Cardiomyocyte‐Derived USP20 Attenuates Diabetic Cardiomyopathy by Facilitating the Degradation of STING and Mitigating STING‐Mediated Inflammation

doi: 10.1096/fj.202503913R

Figure Lengend Snippet: USP20 attenuates inflammatory response via modulation of the STING signaling pathway. (A, B) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3, and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (A) and the statistical results, data has been normalized against GAPDH (B). n = 5. (C) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes overexpressing USP20 induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (D, E) Expression of STING, TBK1, p‐TBK1, IRF3 and p‐IRF3 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA tested by western blotting (D) and the statistical results, data have been normalized against GAPDH (E). n = 5. (F) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 and Vcam1 in cardiomyocytes transfected with si‐USP20 or si‐NC and induced by HG + PA. n = 5. (G) The mRNA expression levels of Il‐1β, Il‐6, Il‐18, Tnf‐α, Cxcl1, Ccl2, Icam1 , and Vcam1 in heart tissues of USP20 fl/fl non‐diabetic controls, USP20 conditional knockout (CKO) non‐diabetic controls, USP20 fl/fl diabetic mice, and USP20 CKO diabetic mice. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05, p > 0.05, ns: No differences. n : The number of independent biological replicates.

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against GAPDH (1:1000, HUABIO, ET1601‐4), USP20 (1:1000, proteintech, 17491‐1‐AP), MyHC (1:1000, HUABIO, ET1702‐88), ANP (1:200, SANTA, sc‐515701), STING (1:1000, HUABIO, HA722832), P62 (1:1000, HUABIO, HA721171), p‐STING (1:1000, HUABIO, HA723137), TBK1 (1:1000, proteintech, 28397‐1‐AP), p‐TBK1 (1:1000, proteintech, 82383‐1‐RR), IRF3 (1:1000, proteintech, 11312‐1‐AP), p‐IRF3 (1:1000, proteintech, ET1705‐81), HA (1:1000, proteintech, 51064‐2‐AP).

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Transfection, Knock-Out