Journal: Current opinion in critical care

Article Title: Novel Approaches to Metabolic Assessment and Structured Exercise to Promote Recovery in ICU Survivors

doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000748

Figure Lengend Snippet: Segmented CT analysis at the level of L3; blue is the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) layer, red is muscle, green is intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) and yellow is visceral adipose tissue (VAT). MuscleSound® echo-intensity heatmap of the rectus femoris muscle.

Article Snippet: IMAT derived from the MuscleSound IMAT algorithm compared to IMAT form segmented CT analyses, correlated well.

Techniques:

Journal: Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Article Title: Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and RapidArc with single arc and dual arc for malignant glioma involving the parietal lobe

doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.872

Figure Lengend Snippet: Dose distribution of a representative patient with axial views for (A) intensity modulated radiotherapy, and RapidArc with (B) a single arc and (C) a dual arc.

Article Snippet: IMAT (RapidArc; Varian Medical Systems, Inc.) has been increasingly used for numerous types of tumors from different anatomical sites, including those in the CNS.

Techniques:

Journal: Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Article Title: Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and RapidArc with single arc and dual arc for malignant glioma involving the parietal lobe

doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.872

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) D2% and (B) D50% of OARs. *P<0.05 with significant difference. D2% of OARs: Lens R, RA1 vs. IMRT and RA2 vs. IMRT; Lens L, RA1 vs. IMRT; Optic nerve R, RA2 vs. IMRT; Optic nerve L, RA1 vs. IMRT. D50% of OARs: Brainstem, RA1 vs. RA2; Lens R, RA1 vs. IMRT and RA2 vs. IMRT; Optic nerve R, RA1 vs. IMRT and RA2 vs. IMRT. OARs, organs at risk; L, left; R, right; IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy; RA1, RapidArc with single arc; RA2, RapidArc with dual arc; D2%, near-maximum dose; D50%, median dose.

Article Snippet: IMAT (RapidArc; Varian Medical Systems, Inc.) has been increasingly used for numerous types of tumors from different anatomical sites, including those in the CNS.

Techniques:

Journal: Molecular and Clinical Oncology

Article Title: Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and RapidArc with single arc and dual arc for malignant glioma involving the parietal lobe

doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.872

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean dose-volume histogram of patients with IMRT, RA1, and RA2, showing results for the (A) brainstem, (B) right lens, (C) left lens, (D) right optic nerve, (E) left optic nerve, (F) optic chiasma, (G) pituitary and (H) B-P. IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy; RA1, RapidArc with single arc; RA2, RapidArc with dual arc; B-P, whole brain minus planned target volume 2.

Article Snippet: IMAT (RapidArc; Varian Medical Systems, Inc.) has been increasingly used for numerous types of tumors from different anatomical sites, including those in the CNS.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle

Article Title: The utility of a portable muscle ultrasound in the assessment of muscle alterations in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13305

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of the muscle ultrasound, muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance assessments

Article Snippet: The MuscleSound‐derived estimates of cross‐sectional area and IMAT, as well as ASMM, strength and physical performance outcomes are depicted in Table .

Techniques:

Journal: Nutrients

Article Title: Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study

doi: 10.3390/nu16162768

Figure Lengend Snippet: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for IMAT index with area under the curve. IMAT: intramuscular adipose tissue (in color for print).

Article Snippet: While some studies have previously evaluated the intra-rater consistency for other MuscleSound ® -derived parameters [ , ] and manual intramuscular fat calculations [ ], this study is the first to do so for AI-calculated IMAT.

Techniques:

Journal: Nutrients

Article Title: Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study

doi: 10.3390/nu16162768

Figure Lengend Snippet: Intra-rater IMAT and IMAT index. IMAT: intramuscular adipose tissue; RF: rectus femoris; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficients; CI: confidence interval. *: p -value < 0.05.

Article Snippet: While some studies have previously evaluated the intra-rater consistency for other MuscleSound ® -derived parameters [ , ] and manual intramuscular fat calculations [ ], this study is the first to do so for AI-calculated IMAT.

Techniques:

Journal: Nutrients

Article Title: Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study

doi: 10.3390/nu16162768

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plot for IMAT index intra-rater agreement. IMAT: intramuscular adipose tissue (in color for print).

Article Snippet: While some studies have previously evaluated the intra-rater consistency for other MuscleSound ® -derived parameters [ , ] and manual intramuscular fat calculations [ ], this study is the first to do so for AI-calculated IMAT.

Techniques:

Journal: Nutrients

Article Title: Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study

doi: 10.3390/nu16162768

Figure Lengend Snippet: Inter-rater IMAT and IMAT index. IMAT: intramuscular adipose tissue; RF: rectus femoris; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficients; CI: confidence interval. *: p -value < 0.05.

Article Snippet: While some studies have previously evaluated the intra-rater consistency for other MuscleSound ® -derived parameters [ , ] and manual intramuscular fat calculations [ ], this study is the first to do so for AI-calculated IMAT.

Techniques:

Journal: Nutrients

Article Title: Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study

doi: 10.3390/nu16162768

Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland–Altman plot for IMAT index inter-rater agreement. IMAT: intramuscular adipose tissue (in color for print).

Article Snippet: While some studies have previously evaluated the intra-rater consistency for other MuscleSound ® -derived parameters [ , ] and manual intramuscular fat calculations [ ], this study is the first to do so for AI-calculated IMAT.

Techniques: