|
ATCC
bg01v hesc line ![]() Bg01v Hesc Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/bg01v hesc line/product/ATCC Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bg01v hesc line - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Corning Life Sciences
hescqualified matrigel ![]() Hescqualified Matrigel, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hescqualified matrigel/product/Corning Life Sciences Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hescqualified matrigel - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Greiner Bio
hesc-bm ![]() Hesc Bm, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hesc-bm/product/Greiner Bio Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hesc-bm - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Jackson Laboratory
undifferentiated hesc ![]() Undifferentiated Hesc, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/undifferentiated hesc/product/Jackson Laboratory Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
undifferentiated hesc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Geron Bio
h7 hesc line ![]() H7 Hesc Line, supplied by Geron Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/h7 hesc line/product/Geron Bio Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
h7 hesc line - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Greiner Bio
specific freezing medium hesc clumps ![]() Specific Freezing Medium Hesc Clumps, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/specific freezing medium hesc clumps/product/Greiner Bio Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
specific freezing medium hesc clumps - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Corning Life Sciences
coring matrigel hesc-qualified matrix ![]() Coring Matrigel Hesc Qualified Matrix, supplied by Corning Life Sciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/coring matrigel hesc-qualified matrix/product/Corning Life Sciences Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
coring matrigel hesc-qualified matrix - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
StemCells Inc
hesc lines ![]() Hesc Lines, supplied by StemCells Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hesc lines/product/StemCells Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hesc lines - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Becton Dickinson
hesc-qualified matrigel ![]() Hesc Qualified Matrigel, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hesc-qualified matrigel/product/Becton Dickinson Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hesc-qualified matrigel - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Becton Dickinson
hesc-grade matrigel ![]() Hesc Grade Matrigel, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/hesc-grade matrigel/product/Becton Dickinson Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hesc-grade matrigel - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Becton Dickinson
matrigel (hesc-qualified matrix ![]() Matrigel (Hesc Qualified Matrix, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/matrigel (hesc-qualified matrix/product/Becton Dickinson Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matrigel (hesc-qualified matrix - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
BresaGen Inc
bgo1 hes cells ![]() Bgo1 Hes Cells, supplied by BresaGen Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/bgo1 hes cells/product/BresaGen Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bgo1 hes cells - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports
Article Title: Effect of cellular mass on chondrogenic differentiation during embryoid body formation
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9272
Figure Lengend Snippet: Size of EBs and time (days) in the suspension culture affects the expression of germ layer specific genes. During suspension cell culture, the pluripotency markers, (A) NANOG and (B) SOX2, decreased among all studied variants. Gene expression analysis indicated that the mesoderm, (C) Brachyury and (D) MIXL1, germ layer was favoured in EBs formed from 500 and 1,000 cell wells when compared with the 1,500 and 2,000 cell wells at the end of suspension culture (day 15). The mesenchymal marker (E) SMA and endoderm marker (F) FOXA2 did not predominantly express in the studied variants. Gene expression analysis indicated that the ectoderm germ layer, (G) VIM and (H) PAX6, was favoured in EBs formed from 500 and 1,000 cell wells when compared with the 1,500 and 2,000 cell wells at the end of the suspension culture (day 15). The y-axis represents the relative expression of analysed genes, normalized to the BG01V cell line. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, as indicated. EBs, embryoid bodies; SOX2, sex determining region Y-box 2; MIXL1, mix paired-like homeobox; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; FOXA2, forkhead box protein A2; VIM, vimentin; PAX6, paired box 6.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Suspension, Expressing, Cell Culture, Gene Expression, Marker, Standard Deviation
Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports
Article Title: Effect of cellular mass on chondrogenic differentiation during embryoid body formation
doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9272
Figure Lengend Snippet: Smaller EBs exhibit more prochondrogenic outcomes. Following collection of EBs from suspension culture, the 3 week chondrogenic differentiation protocol was performed and gene expression was analysed. Expression of (A) NANOG and (B) SOX2 decreased in all studied variants. Expression of (C) T, (D) SOX9 and (E) FGFR3 was significantly higher in EBs formed in 500-cell wells when compared with 2,000-cell wells. (F) CD44 was significantly expressed in differentiated 2,000-cell wells EB collected on the fifth day of suspension culture. (G) The low level of COL1A2 expression was observed in all studied variants following chondrogenic differentiation. (H) Expression of COL2A1 was significantly higher in EBs formed in 500-cell wells when compared with 2,000-cell wells. (I) ACAN expression increased only in EBs collected on day 5. Overall, 15 days of suspension culture resulted in a lower expression of analysed genes in chondrogenically differentiated EBs formed from 500- and 2,000-cell wells. The y-axis represents the relative expression of analysed genes, normalized to the BG01V or HC-402-05a cell line. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0,05, as indicated. EBs, embryoid bodies; hESC, human embryonic stem cells; SOX, sex determining region Y-box; T, brachyury gene; FGFR3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 3; CD44, cluster of differentiation 44; COL, collagen; ACAN, aggrecan.
Article Snippet: The
Techniques: Suspension, Gene Expression, Expressing, Standard Deviation
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Pathogen Sensing Pathways in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-Endothelial Cells: Role of NOD1 Receptors
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091119
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) TLR4 and NOD1 expression in hESC-EC (relative to expression in HUVEC) in vitro . Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by one-sample t-test (*p<0.05) for NOD1 vs. TLR4 expression. (B) Representative immunocytochemistry images of hESC-EC (top) and HUVEC (bottom) stained for the NF-κB p65-subunit (red) in response to 1 hour treatment with or without, C12-iE-DAP (NOD1 agonist; 10 µg/ml), LPS (TLR4 agonist; 1 µg/ml) or IL-1β (1 ng/ml). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue; 5 µg/ml). Images were acquired using a Cellomics VTi HCS Arrayscanner with a CarlZeiss microscope. (C) LPS (TLR4 agonist; 1 µg/ml) and C12-iE-DAP (NOD1 agonist; 10 µg/ml) induced CXCL8 release after 24 hour stimulation. Data are mean ± SEM. For HUVEC, hESC-EC or BOEC, n = 4–8. For iPSC-EC, n = 2, single isolation. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test for each cell type (*p<0.05) and by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test for between cell types. Analysis was not performed on data from iPSC-EC.
Article Snippet: Experiments were carried out using the
Techniques: Expressing, In Vitro, Immunocytochemistry, Staining, Microscopy, Isolation, Comparison
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Pathogen Sensing Pathways in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-Endothelial Cells: Role of NOD1 Receptors
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091119
Figure Lengend Snippet: MSD analysis of cytokine (pg/ml) release from hESC-EC.
Article Snippet: Experiments were carried out using the
Techniques:
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Pathogen Sensing Pathways in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-Endothelial Cells: Role of NOD1 Receptors
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091119
Figure Lengend Snippet: TLR4 and NOD1 expression in (A) hESC-EC and (B) HUVEC before (pre-implant; open bars) and 21 days after (post-implant; filled bars) implantation in vivo (‘conditioning’). Data are mean ± SEM and are normalized at unity (1) to gene levels in pre-implant cells. HUVEC; NOD1 pre-implant n = 8, post implant n = 4: HUVEC; TLR4 pre-implant n = 10, post implant n = 3. hESC-ECs; NOD1 pre-implant n = 6, post implant n = 5: hESC-ECs; TLR4 pre-implant n = 10, post implant n = 6. Data was obtained from 2 independent experiments (using up to 12 rats per group). Statistical significance was determined by one-sample t-test where results were compared to a theoretical control of 1 (*p<0.05). ND = none detectable.
Article Snippet: Experiments were carried out using the
Techniques: Expressing, In Vivo, Control
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Pathogen Sensing Pathways in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-Endothelial Cells: Role of NOD1 Receptors
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091119
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Effect of LPS (1 µg/ml) or C12-iE-DAP (10 µg/ml) on CXCL8 release from hESC-EC and HUVEC after 24 hours. (B) Effect of Haemophilus influenzae (HIN) (10 5 –10 8 CFU/ml) on CXCL8 release from hESC-EC (solid line) or HUVEC (dashed line) after 24 hours. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3 representative of 6 hESC-EC isolations. Statistical significance for responses to drugs or bacteria was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test (p<0.05).
Article Snippet: Experiments were carried out using the
Techniques: Bacteria, Comparison
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Pathogen Sensing Pathways in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived-Endothelial Cells: Role of NOD1 Receptors
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091119
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Relative expression (vs. GAPDH) of NOD1 following 48 hour incubation with NOD1 siRNA normalized to non-targeting siRNA; n = 6. (B) CXCL8 release from hESC-EC following 48 hour pre-incubation with non-targeting siRNA (open bars) or NOD1-siRNA (filled bars) and 24 hour treatment +/− C12-iE-DAP (10 µg/ml) or Haemophilus influenzae (HIN) (10 7 –10 8 CFU/ml); n = 7–8. (C) Effect of GSK'214 (300 nM; RIP2 inhibitor) or GSK'217 (300 nM; NOD1 inhibitor), given 30 minutes before a 24 hour treatment with HIN (10 7 CFU/ml) or C12-iE-DAP (10 µg/ml) on CXCL8 release; n = 4. It should be noted that GSK drugs increased CXCL8 release under basal conditions; for each experiment this was subtracted from treatment groups. For panel A, statistical significance was determined by one-sample t-test. For panel B statistical significance within siRNA groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test (*p<0.05), and between groups by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test (+p<0.05). For panel C statistical significance for the effects of inhibitor of C12-iE-DAP or HIN induced CXCL8 was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test (*p<0.05).
Article Snippet: Experiments were carried out using the
Techniques: Expressing, Incubation, Comparison