e ratti atcc 700914 Search Results


90
ATCC enterococcus rattus
Nucleotide sequence identity (top values, boldface), amino acid sequence identity (middle values), and similarity (bottom values) for the 600-bp Cpn60 sequence fragments from E. gallinarum, E. casseliflavus, E. hirae, E. asini, E. dispar, E. mundtii, E. rattus, <t>Enterococcus</t> new sp. Facklam, E. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. pseudoavium, E. raffinosus R871, E. avium, E. malodoratus, V. fluvialis, E. saccharolyticus, E. cecorum, L. lactis, and L. garvieae reference isolates. The sequences used in this analysis are the 552-bp sequences between the degenerate PCR primer annealing sites in each case. Boxes indicate instances in which there is divergence at the nucleotide level, but the amino acid sequences are identical.
Enterococcus Rattus, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enterococcus rattus/product/ATCC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enterococcus rattus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Nucleotide sequence identity (top values, boldface), amino acid sequence identity (middle values), and similarity (bottom values) for the 600-bp Cpn60 sequence fragments from E. gallinarum, E. casseliflavus, E. hirae, E. asini, E. dispar, E. mundtii, E. rattus, Enterococcus new sp. Facklam, E. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. pseudoavium, E. raffinosus R871, E. avium, E. malodoratus, V. fluvialis, E. saccharolyticus, E. cecorum, L. lactis, and L. garvieae reference isolates. The sequences used in this analysis are the 552-bp sequences between the degenerate PCR primer annealing sites in each case. Boxes indicate instances in which there is divergence at the nucleotide level, but the amino acid sequences are identical.

Journal:

Article Title: Identification of Enterococcus Species and Phenotypically Similar Lactococcus and Vagococcus Species by Reverse Checkerboard Hybridization to Chaperonin 60 Gene Sequences

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Nucleotide sequence identity (top values, boldface), amino acid sequence identity (middle values), and similarity (bottom values) for the 600-bp Cpn60 sequence fragments from E. gallinarum, E. casseliflavus, E. hirae, E. asini, E. dispar, E. mundtii, E. rattus, Enterococcus new sp. Facklam, E. faecium, E. durans, E. faecalis, E. pseudoavium, E. raffinosus R871, E. avium, E. malodoratus, V. fluvialis, E. saccharolyticus, E. cecorum, L. lactis, and L. garvieae reference isolates. The sequences used in this analysis are the 552-bp sequences between the degenerate PCR primer annealing sites in each case. Boxes indicate instances in which there is divergence at the nucleotide level, but the amino acid sequences are identical.

Article Snippet: The reference bacterial isolates used were E. saccharolyticus ATCC 43076, Enterococcus pseudoavium ATCC 49372, Enterococcus avium ATCC 14025, Enterococcus raffinosus ATCC 49427, Enterococcus malodoratus ATCC 43197, E. faecium ATCC 19434, E. casseliflavus ATCC 25788, Enterococcus mundtii ATCC 43186, E. faecalis ATCC 19433, Enterococcus hirae ATCC 8043, E. cecorum ATCC 43198, E. gallinarum ATCC 49573, Enterococcus durans ATCC 19432, Enterococcus dispar ATCC 51266, Enterococcus rattus (ATCC 700914), Enterococcus asini (ATCC 700915), and a new Enterococcus sp. strain, CDC-1390-83 (ATCC 700913), as well as Vagococcus fluvialis ATCC 49515, Lactococcus lactis ATCC 19435, and Lactococcus garvieae ATCC 43921.

Techniques: Sequencing

Results of phenotyping, Cpn60 ID, and sequence comparisons for 121 organisms examined in this study

Journal:

Article Title: Identification of Enterococcus Species and Phenotypically Similar Lactococcus and Vagococcus Species by Reverse Checkerboard Hybridization to Chaperonin 60 Gene Sequences

doi:

Figure Lengend Snippet: Results of phenotyping, Cpn60 ID, and sequence comparisons for 121 organisms examined in this study

Article Snippet: The reference bacterial isolates used were E. saccharolyticus ATCC 43076, Enterococcus pseudoavium ATCC 49372, Enterococcus avium ATCC 14025, Enterococcus raffinosus ATCC 49427, Enterococcus malodoratus ATCC 43197, E. faecium ATCC 19434, E. casseliflavus ATCC 25788, Enterococcus mundtii ATCC 43186, E. faecalis ATCC 19433, Enterococcus hirae ATCC 8043, E. cecorum ATCC 43198, E. gallinarum ATCC 49573, Enterococcus durans ATCC 19432, Enterococcus dispar ATCC 51266, Enterococcus rattus (ATCC 700914), Enterococcus asini (ATCC 700915), and a new Enterococcus sp. strain, CDC-1390-83 (ATCC 700913), as well as Vagococcus fluvialis ATCC 49515, Lactococcus lactis ATCC 19435, and Lactococcus garvieae ATCC 43921.

Techniques: Sequencing, Hybridization