dlst Search Results


93
MedChemExpress dlst
WB results of cuproptosis-related protein expression. (A) Western blots for FDX 1, SLC 31 A1, LIAS, <t>DLST,</t> DLD, <t>and</t> <t>SDHB</t> in rat lung tissue. (B–G) relative levels of FDX 1, SLC 31 A1, LIAS, DLST, DLD, and SDHB in rat lung tissue (n = 3). ## p < 0.05 vs. control group; ** p < 0.05 vs. I/R group.
Dlst, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dlst/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dlst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher gene exp dlst mm00513470 m1
List of genes measured by real-time RT-PCR in this study. TaqMan ® gene expression assays. The following TaqMan probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) were used in our study
Gene Exp Dlst Mm00513470 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp dlst mm00513470 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp dlst mm00513470 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti dihydrolipoamide s succinyltransferase dlst antibody
Figure 6. Effect of DATS on expression of tricarboxylic acid cycle-associated proteins. (A) Reactome pathway enrichment analysis of downreg- ulated genes by DATS treatment in MCF-10A and SK-BR-3 cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis for ACO2 and <t>DLST</t> in MCF-10A and SK-BR-3 cells treated with DMSO (control) or indicated doses of DATS for specified time points. The numbers above bands represent fold change in expression relative to corresponding DMSO-treated controls. (C) Quantification of ACO2 and DLST expression in SK-BR-3 cells. Results combined from three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3) and statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. DATS, diallyl trisulfide; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide, DLST, dihydrolipoamide <t>S-succinyltransferase;</t> ACO2, aconitase 2; HDR, Homology directed repair; ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related; AP, abasic sites; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.
Anti Dihydrolipoamide S Succinyltransferase Dlst Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti dihydrolipoamide s succinyltransferase dlst antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dihydrolipoamide s succinyltransferase dlst antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bethyl dlst antibody
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Dlst Antibody, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dlst antibody/product/Bethyl
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dlst antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti dlst
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Anti Dlst, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti dlst/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dlst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti dihydrolipoyl lysine residue succinyltransferase
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Anti Dihydrolipoyl Lysine Residue Succinyltransferase, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti dihydrolipoyl lysine residue succinyltransferase/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti dihydrolipoyl lysine residue succinyltransferase - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Atlas Antibodies dlst
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Dlst, supplied by Atlas Antibodies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dlst/product/Atlas Antibodies
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dlst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Biorbyt anti tshr primary antibody
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Anti Tshr Primary Antibody, supplied by Biorbyt, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti tshr primary antibody/product/Biorbyt
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti tshr primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Thermo Fisher gene exp dlst hs04276516 g1
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Gene Exp Dlst Hs04276516 G1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp dlst hs04276516 g1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp dlst hs04276516 g1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Boster Bio dlst
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Dlst, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dlst/product/Boster Bio
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dlst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Taiho Pharmaceutical lymphocyte stimulation test (dlst)
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Lymphocyte Stimulation Test (Dlst), supplied by Taiho Pharmaceutical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lymphocyte stimulation test (dlst)/product/Taiho Pharmaceutical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lymphocyte stimulation test (dlst) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ABclonal Biotechnology anti-dlst
Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with <t>DLST</t> and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody <t>or</t> <t>IgG</t> as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.
Anti Dlst, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-dlst/product/ABclonal Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-dlst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


WB results of cuproptosis-related protein expression. (A) Western blots for FDX 1, SLC 31 A1, LIAS, DLST, DLD, and SDHB in rat lung tissue. (B–G) relative levels of FDX 1, SLC 31 A1, LIAS, DLST, DLD, and SDHB in rat lung tissue (n = 3). ## p < 0.05 vs. control group; ** p < 0.05 vs. I/R group.

Journal: Frontiers in Pharmacology

Article Title: Dexmedetomidine alleviates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting cuproptosis: an in vivo study

doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1562535

Figure Lengend Snippet: WB results of cuproptosis-related protein expression. (A) Western blots for FDX 1, SLC 31 A1, LIAS, DLST, DLD, and SDHB in rat lung tissue. (B–G) relative levels of FDX 1, SLC 31 A1, LIAS, DLST, DLD, and SDHB in rat lung tissue (n = 3). ## p < 0.05 vs. control group; ** p < 0.05 vs. I/R group.

Article Snippet: Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against: lipoic acid (Abcam, 1:1,000), FDX1 (Abcam, 1:1,000), LIAS (Proteintech, 1:1,000), SDHB (Proteintech, 1:1,000), DLAT (Proteintech, 1:1,000), DLD (Proteintech, 1:1,000), SLC31A1 (MCE, 1:1,000), DLST (MCE, 1:1,000), and β-actin (Sevier, 1:5,000).

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Control

Immunohistochemical and WB results of lipoacylated proteins. (A–C) representative images of lipoacylated protein immunohistochemical staining in rat lung tissue. (D) Western blots for lip-DLAT and lip-DLST. (E, F) relative levels of lip-DLAT and lip-DLST in rats lung tissue (n = 3). ## p < 0.05 vs. control group; ** p < 0.05 vs. I/R group.

Journal: Frontiers in Pharmacology

Article Title: Dexmedetomidine alleviates lung ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting cuproptosis: an in vivo study

doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1562535

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemical and WB results of lipoacylated proteins. (A–C) representative images of lipoacylated protein immunohistochemical staining in rat lung tissue. (D) Western blots for lip-DLAT and lip-DLST. (E, F) relative levels of lip-DLAT and lip-DLST in rats lung tissue (n = 3). ## p < 0.05 vs. control group; ** p < 0.05 vs. I/R group.

Article Snippet: Membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against: lipoic acid (Abcam, 1:1,000), FDX1 (Abcam, 1:1,000), LIAS (Proteintech, 1:1,000), SDHB (Proteintech, 1:1,000), DLAT (Proteintech, 1:1,000), DLD (Proteintech, 1:1,000), SLC31A1 (MCE, 1:1,000), DLST (MCE, 1:1,000), and β-actin (Sevier, 1:5,000).

Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Western Blot, Control

List of genes measured by real-time RT-PCR in this study. TaqMan ® gene expression assays. The following TaqMan probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) were used in our study

Journal: Metabolomics

Article Title: Effect of everolimus on the glucose metabolic pathway in mouse skeletal muscle cells (C2C12)

doi: 10.1007/s11306-017-1236-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: List of genes measured by real-time RT-PCR in this study. TaqMan ® gene expression assays. The following TaqMan probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) were used in our study

Article Snippet: Dlst (Mm00513470_m1) , Eno1 (Mm01619597_g1) , Fh1 (Mm01321349_m1).

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression

Metabolic profiling of intracellular glycometabolism. Changes in metabolite levels after 48 h exposure to everolimus ( closed bars , EVE) were compared with those without everolimus at 48 h (Control). The data represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Statistically significant differences between the EVE and control: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (Student’s t -test). Abbreviations: G6P glucose 6-phosphate, F6P fructose 6-phosphate, F1,6P fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, GAP glyceraldehyde phosphate, DHAP dihydroxyacetone phosphate, 1,3-Bis-PG 1,3-Bis phosphoglycerate, 3PG 3-phosphoglycerate, 2PG 2-phosphoglycerate, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, Ac-CoA acetyl CoA, Ru5P ribulose 5-phosphate, R5P ribose 5-phosphate, Xu5P xylulose 5-phosphate, mTOR mammalian target of rapamycin, HIF1a hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, GLUT glucose transporter, HK1 hexokinase-1, GPI glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, PFKM 6-phosphofructokinase, ALDOA aldolase, TPI1P2 triosephosphate isomerase, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, PGK1 phosphoglycerate kinase-1, ENO1 enolase-1, PKM2 pyruvate kinase-2, LDHA _lactate dehydrogenase A, PDHA1 pyruvate dehydrogenase α1, G6PD 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, PGD 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, RPIA ribose-5-phosphate isomerase A, TKT transketolase, TALDO1 transaldolase-1, CS citrate synthase, ACO1 aconitase-1, IDH1 isocitrate dehydrogenase-1, OGDH α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, DLST dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase, SUCLG2 succinyl-CoA ligase, SDHA succinate dehydrogenase A, FH fumarate hydratase, MDH1 malate dehydrogenase-1

Journal: Metabolomics

Article Title: Effect of everolimus on the glucose metabolic pathway in mouse skeletal muscle cells (C2C12)

doi: 10.1007/s11306-017-1236-5

Figure Lengend Snippet: Metabolic profiling of intracellular glycometabolism. Changes in metabolite levels after 48 h exposure to everolimus ( closed bars , EVE) were compared with those without everolimus at 48 h (Control). The data represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Statistically significant differences between the EVE and control: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 (Student’s t -test). Abbreviations: G6P glucose 6-phosphate, F6P fructose 6-phosphate, F1,6P fructose 1,6-bisphosphate, GAP glyceraldehyde phosphate, DHAP dihydroxyacetone phosphate, 1,3-Bis-PG 1,3-Bis phosphoglycerate, 3PG 3-phosphoglycerate, 2PG 2-phosphoglycerate, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, Ac-CoA acetyl CoA, Ru5P ribulose 5-phosphate, R5P ribose 5-phosphate, Xu5P xylulose 5-phosphate, mTOR mammalian target of rapamycin, HIF1a hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, GLUT glucose transporter, HK1 hexokinase-1, GPI glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, PFKM 6-phosphofructokinase, ALDOA aldolase, TPI1P2 triosephosphate isomerase, GAPDH glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, PGK1 phosphoglycerate kinase-1, ENO1 enolase-1, PKM2 pyruvate kinase-2, LDHA _lactate dehydrogenase A, PDHA1 pyruvate dehydrogenase α1, G6PD 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, PGD 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, RPIA ribose-5-phosphate isomerase A, TKT transketolase, TALDO1 transaldolase-1, CS citrate synthase, ACO1 aconitase-1, IDH1 isocitrate dehydrogenase-1, OGDH α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, DLST dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase, SUCLG2 succinyl-CoA ligase, SDHA succinate dehydrogenase A, FH fumarate hydratase, MDH1 malate dehydrogenase-1

Article Snippet: Dlst (Mm00513470_m1) , Eno1 (Mm01619597_g1) , Fh1 (Mm01321349_m1).

Techniques: Control

Figure 6. Effect of DATS on expression of tricarboxylic acid cycle-associated proteins. (A) Reactome pathway enrichment analysis of downreg- ulated genes by DATS treatment in MCF-10A and SK-BR-3 cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis for ACO2 and DLST in MCF-10A and SK-BR-3 cells treated with DMSO (control) or indicated doses of DATS for specified time points. The numbers above bands represent fold change in expression relative to corresponding DMSO-treated controls. (C) Quantification of ACO2 and DLST expression in SK-BR-3 cells. Results combined from three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3) and statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. DATS, diallyl trisulfide; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide, DLST, dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase; ACO2, aconitase 2; HDR, Homology directed repair; ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related; AP, abasic sites; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Journal: Journal of Cancer Prevention

Article Title: Breast Cancer Selective Disruption of Actin Cytoskeleton by Diallyl Trisulfide

doi: 10.15430/jcp.2022.27.2.101

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Effect of DATS on expression of tricarboxylic acid cycle-associated proteins. (A) Reactome pathway enrichment analysis of downreg- ulated genes by DATS treatment in MCF-10A and SK-BR-3 cell lines. (B) Immunoblot analysis for ACO2 and DLST in MCF-10A and SK-BR-3 cells treated with DMSO (control) or indicated doses of DATS for specified time points. The numbers above bands represent fold change in expression relative to corresponding DMSO-treated controls. (C) Quantification of ACO2 and DLST expression in SK-BR-3 cells. Results combined from three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3) and statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. DATS, diallyl trisulfide; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide, DLST, dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase; ACO2, aconitase 2; HDR, Homology directed repair; ATR, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related; AP, abasic sites; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen.

Article Snippet: Anti-aconitase 2 (ACO2) antibody and anti-dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase (DLST) antibody were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Control

Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with DLST and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody or IgG as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: A lncRNA-mediated metabolic rewiring of cell senescence.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115747

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. sin-lncRNA interacts with DLST and controls its subcellular localization (A) RNA-FISH based on locked nucleic acid (LNA) technology on fixed IMR90 ER:RAS cells depleted or not of sin-lncRNA (siRNA_sin-lncRNA#1/3) and treated for 5 days with 4OHT. Two different LNAs were used. Incubation without LNA probe (‘‘No_probe’’) was used as control. Scale bar: 10 μm. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of a set of genes after mitochondria purification from proliferating (−4OHT) or senescent cells (+4OHT) using Mitotracker (green, 488) staining and FACS sorter. The graph shows a representative experiment. (C) Schematic representation of the TCA cycle that takes place in the mitochondria. DLST enzyme is highlighted in red. (D) RNA immunoprecipitation analysis monitoring DLST binding to sin-lncRNA, MALAT1, and GAPDH RNA in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS, using anti-DLST antibody or IgG as a negative control. The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 2). (E) Left, western blot analysis of DLST cellular fractionation in control and sin-lncRNA-depleted (siRNA#1/3) senescent IMR90 ER:RAS. GAPDH and H3 were used as cytoplasmic and nuclear controls, respectively. Right, percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic distribution of DLST normalized to GAPDH (cyto) or H3 (nucl). The graph represents the mean ± SD (n = 3). Two-tailed Student’s t test, **p < 0.01.

Article Snippet: After centrifugation, the samples were precleared with Dynabeads Protein A (Invitrogen) for 1 h. One per cent of the sample was used as the input control and the remaining extracts were incubated with 10 μg DLST antibody (Bethyl) or IgG at 4 ◦C overnight.

Techniques: Incubation, Control, Quantitative RT-PCR, Purification, Staining, RNA Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay, Negative Control, Western Blot, Cell Fractionation, Two Tailed Test