cd45 percp Search Results


92
Cytek Biosciences cd45 2 percp cy5 5
Cd45 2 Percp Cy5 5, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/PerCP-Cyanine5%2E5+Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E2/pmc05094194-79-12-10
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 2 percp cy5 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems percp anti rat cd45
Percp Anti Rat Cd45, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/CD45+Antibody+(EM-05)+%5BPerCP%5D/pmc04680334-140-8-9
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
percp anti rat cd45 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Elabscience Biotechnology flow cytometry percp cy5 5 anti mouse cd45 antibody
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Flow Cytometry Percp Cy5 5 Anti Mouse Cd45 Antibody, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/PerCP%2FCyanine5%2E5+Anti-Mouse+CD45+Antibody/pmc11227529-353-0-7
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flow cytometry percp cy5 5 anti mouse cd45 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems cd45 percp rat igg2b
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Cd45 Percp Rat Igg2b, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/CD45+Antibody+(YW62%2E3)+%5BPerCP%5D/pmc06130356-428-83-87
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 percp rat igg2b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

88
Cytek Biosciences apc
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Apc, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/PerCP-Cyanine5%2E5+Anti-Mouse+CD45%2E1/pmc06703922-8-2-6
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems cd45 percp
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Cd45 Percp, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/CD45+Antibody+(F10-89-4)+%5BPerCP%5D/pmc05816662-262-28-29
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 percp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cytek Biosciences anti cd45
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Anti Cd45, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/PerCP+Anti-Mouse+CD45/pmc12989849-9-0-6
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd45 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Elabscience Biotechnology cd45
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Cd45, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/PerCP%2FCyanine5%2E5+Anti-Rat+CD45+Antibody/pmc11889361-131-14-16
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cytek Biosciences test antibody cd45 percpcy5 5
a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting <t>CD45</t> + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Test Antibody Cd45 Percpcy5 5, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/PerCP-Cyanine5%2E5+Anti-Mouse+CD45/10__7554_slash_elife__46045-231-147-154
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
test antibody cd45 percpcy5 5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals cd45 percp 304026
Figure 2. Plasma cells are elevated in the circulation of IRF5 homozygous risk donors. (A–C) Freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and plasma cells gated as <t>CD45+CD19+IgD–CD38+</t> (PB, plasmablasts). (A) Representa- tive dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws from independent homozygous risk (n = 5) and nonrisk (n = 5) donors. A is pregated for CD45 and CD19. (B) The number of circulating PBs from n = 12 risk and n = 11 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of the CD19+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Similar to B except percentage of PBs from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and representative mixed haplotypes from Figure 1A are plotted together (1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons test using risk [E/E] as control group and excluding groups A/E B/C and E/J because of insufficient sample size. (D) Isolated naive B cells from homozy- gous nonrisk and risk donors were in vitro cultured for 7 days with 150 ng/mL CD40L alone or with 100 ng/mL IL-21, 10 μg/mL anti-IgM antibody, and 2.5 μg/mL CpG-B to drive PB differentiation. Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of a single matched nonrisk and risk donor after 7 days of culture. (E) Summarized data from D of n = 4 risk and nonrisk donors are shown (unpaired 2-tailed t test). Experiments were repeated 4 or more times (A and B), were performed once (C), or were repeated twice (D and E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.
Cd45 Percp 304026, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/CD45+Antibody+(101)+%5BPerCP%5D/pm31877114-306-39-61
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd45 percp 304026 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti human cd45 percp
Figure 2. Plasma cells are elevated in the circulation of IRF5 homozygous risk donors. (A–C) Freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and plasma cells gated as <t>CD45+CD19+IgD–CD38+</t> (PB, plasmablasts). (A) Representa- tive dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws from independent homozygous risk (n = 5) and nonrisk (n = 5) donors. A is pregated for CD45 and CD19. (B) The number of circulating PBs from n = 12 risk and n = 11 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of the CD19+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Similar to B except percentage of PBs from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and representative mixed haplotypes from Figure 1A are plotted together (1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons test using risk [E/E] as control group and excluding groups A/E B/C and E/J because of insufficient sample size. (D) Isolated naive B cells from homozy- gous nonrisk and risk donors were in vitro cultured for 7 days with 150 ng/mL CD40L alone or with 100 ng/mL IL-21, 10 μg/mL anti-IgM antibody, and 2.5 μg/mL CpG-B to drive PB differentiation. Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of a single matched nonrisk and risk donor after 7 days of culture. (E) Summarized data from D of n = 4 risk and nonrisk donors are shown (unpaired 2-tailed t test). Experiments were repeated 4 or more times (A and B), were performed once (C), or were repeated twice (D and E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.
Anti Human Cd45 Percp, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/Human+CD45+PerCP-conjugated+Antibody/pmc06982057-171-42-57
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human cd45 percp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
Caprico Biotechnologies percp cy5 5 conjugated anti cd45
Figure 2. Plasma cells are elevated in the circulation of IRF5 homozygous risk donors. (A–C) Freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and plasma cells gated as <t>CD45+CD19+IgD–CD38+</t> (PB, plasmablasts). (A) Representa- tive dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws from independent homozygous risk (n = 5) and nonrisk (n = 5) donors. A is pregated for CD45 and CD19. (B) The number of circulating PBs from n = 12 risk and n = 11 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of the CD19+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Similar to B except percentage of PBs from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and representative mixed haplotypes from Figure 1A are plotted together (1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons test using risk [E/E] as control group and excluding groups A/E B/C and E/J because of insufficient sample size. (D) Isolated naive B cells from homozy- gous nonrisk and risk donors were in vitro cultured for 7 days with 150 ng/mL CD40L alone or with 100 ng/mL IL-21, 10 μg/mL anti-IgM antibody, and 2.5 μg/mL CpG-B to drive PB differentiation. Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of a single matched nonrisk and risk donor after 7 days of culture. (E) Summarized data from D of n = 4 risk and nonrisk donors are shown (unpaired 2-tailed t test). Experiments were repeated 4 or more times (A and B), were performed once (C), or were repeated twice (D and E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.
Percp Cy5 5 Conjugated Anti Cd45, supplied by Caprico Biotechnologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd45+percp/CD45+PerCP-Cyanine5%2E5/pmc10239227-78-21-34
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
percp cy5 5 conjugated anti cd45 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: An in-situ peptide-antibody self-assembly to block CD47 and CD24 signaling enhances macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and anti-tumor immune responses

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49825-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Representative H&E and IF staining of cytokeratin 19 (CK19), F4/80 + macrophages and CD8 + T cells for the corresponding 4T1 tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bars are marked in the figures. b Representative flow cytometry plots depicting CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c – g Quantification analysis of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages phagocytosis, CD11b + F4/80 + CD206 hi macrophages, CD11b + F4/80 + CD86 hi macrophages, CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, and CD45 + CD3 + CD4 + Foxp3 + T cells in 4T1 tumors after different treatments. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). h Identification of differentially expressed genes in 4T1 tumors after treating with IgG Control or PAC-SABIs ( n = 5 mice). i Number of differential genes enriched in GO term of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). j GO enrichment analysis of the differential pathways in 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control ( n = 5 mice). k Volcano plot for the transcriptome sequencing of 4T1 tumors treated with PAC-SABIs versus IgG Control. Differentially expressed genes were calculated using a two-sided limma moderated t -test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing ( n = 5 mice). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Flow cytometry: PerCP/Cy5.5 anti-mouse CD45 antibody (1:200, Elabscience, #E-AB-F1136J, clone 30-F11), PE/Cyanine5 anti-mouse CD11b antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #101209, clone M1/70), APC anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #123116, clone BM8), FITC anti-mouse CD206 antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #141703, clone C068C2), FITC anti-mouse CD86 antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #159219, clone A17199A), FITC anti-mouse CD3 antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #555274, clone 17A2), APC anti-mouse CD4 antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #553051, clone RM4-5), PE anti-mouse CD8a antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #553033, clone 53-6.7), PE anti-mouse Foxp3 antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #563101, clone R16-715).

Techniques: Staining, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test, Control, Sequencing

a Scheme of the combination therapeutic strategy. Figure was created with BioRender.com and released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 international license. b Spider plots of individual tumor growth curves for 4T1-tumor-bearing BALB/c mice in each treatment group. c Average tumor growth curve of 4T1-tumor-bearing BALB/c mice in each treatment group. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 7 mice; **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). d Kaplan–Meier survival curves of 4T1 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice treated with the indicated formulation. ( n = 7 mice; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; the p value was analyzed by log-rank test). e Representative H&E staining of lungs harvested from the indicated treatment group. Scale bar: 100 μm. Three independent experiments were performed. f Quantitative analysis of phagocytosis in CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages flow cytometry results. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). g Representative IF images of tumor-infiltrated CD8 + T cells. Scale bar: 100 μm. Three independent experiments were performed. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: An in-situ peptide-antibody self-assembly to block CD47 and CD24 signaling enhances macrophage-mediated phagocytosis and anti-tumor immune responses

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49825-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Scheme of the combination therapeutic strategy. Figure was created with BioRender.com and released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 international license. b Spider plots of individual tumor growth curves for 4T1-tumor-bearing BALB/c mice in each treatment group. c Average tumor growth curve of 4T1-tumor-bearing BALB/c mice in each treatment group. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 7 mice; **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). d Kaplan–Meier survival curves of 4T1 tumor-bearing BALB/c mice treated with the indicated formulation. ( n = 7 mice; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; the p value was analyzed by log-rank test). e Representative H&E staining of lungs harvested from the indicated treatment group. Scale bar: 100 μm. Three independent experiments were performed. f Quantitative analysis of phagocytosis in CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages flow cytometry results. The error bars represent the mean ± SD ( n = 4 independent experiments; *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001; the p value was analyzed by a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). g Representative IF images of tumor-infiltrated CD8 + T cells. Scale bar: 100 μm. Three independent experiments were performed. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: Flow cytometry: PerCP/Cy5.5 anti-mouse CD45 antibody (1:200, Elabscience, #E-AB-F1136J, clone 30-F11), PE/Cyanine5 anti-mouse CD11b antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #101209, clone M1/70), APC anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #123116, clone BM8), FITC anti-mouse CD206 antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #141703, clone C068C2), FITC anti-mouse CD86 antibody (1:200, Biolegend, #159219, clone A17199A), FITC anti-mouse CD3 antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #555274, clone 17A2), APC anti-mouse CD4 antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #553051, clone RM4-5), PE anti-mouse CD8a antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #553033, clone 53-6.7), PE anti-mouse Foxp3 antibody (1:200, BDbioscience, #563101, clone R16-715).

Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Formulation, Staining, Flow Cytometry

Figure 2. Plasma cells are elevated in the circulation of IRF5 homozygous risk donors. (A–C) Freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and plasma cells gated as CD45+CD19+IgD–CD38+ (PB, plasmablasts). (A) Representa- tive dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws from independent homozygous risk (n = 5) and nonrisk (n = 5) donors. A is pregated for CD45 and CD19. (B) The number of circulating PBs from n = 12 risk and n = 11 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of the CD19+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Similar to B except percentage of PBs from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and representative mixed haplotypes from Figure 1A are plotted together (1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons test using risk [E/E] as control group and excluding groups A/E B/C and E/J because of insufficient sample size. (D) Isolated naive B cells from homozy- gous nonrisk and risk donors were in vitro cultured for 7 days with 150 ng/mL CD40L alone or with 100 ng/mL IL-21, 10 μg/mL anti-IgM antibody, and 2.5 μg/mL CpG-B to drive PB differentiation. Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of a single matched nonrisk and risk donor after 7 days of culture. (E) Summarized data from D of n = 4 risk and nonrisk donors are shown (unpaired 2-tailed t test). Experiments were repeated 4 or more times (A and B), were performed once (C), or were repeated twice (D and E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: IRF5 genetic risk variants drive myeloid-specific IRF5 hyperactivation and presymptomatic SLE.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.124020

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Plasma cells are elevated in the circulation of IRF5 homozygous risk donors. (A–C) Freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and plasma cells gated as CD45+CD19+IgD–CD38+ (PB, plasmablasts). (A) Representa- tive dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws from independent homozygous risk (n = 5) and nonrisk (n = 5) donors. A is pregated for CD45 and CD19. (B) The number of circulating PBs from n = 12 risk and n = 11 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of the CD19+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Similar to B except percentage of PBs from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and representative mixed haplotypes from Figure 1A are plotted together (1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparisons test using risk [E/E] as control group and excluding groups A/E B/C and E/J because of insufficient sample size. (D) Isolated naive B cells from homozy- gous nonrisk and risk donors were in vitro cultured for 7 days with 150 ng/mL CD40L alone or with 100 ng/mL IL-21, 10 μg/mL anti-IgM antibody, and 2.5 μg/mL CpG-B to drive PB differentiation. Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of a single matched nonrisk and risk donor after 7 days of culture. (E) Summarized data from D of n = 4 risk and nonrisk donors are shown (unpaired 2-tailed t test). Experiments were repeated 4 or more times (A and B), were performed once (C), or were repeated twice (D and E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ; *P ≤ 0.05; **P ≤ 0.01; ***P ≤ 0.001.

Article Snippet: PBMCs were washed and blocked in PBS supplemented with Fc blocker (422302, BioLegend) for 15 minutes and then stained with antibodies against surface makers for 1 hour (BioLegend: CD303-BV421 354212, CD123-BV510 306022, CD14-PE 301806, CD16-APC Cy7 360710, CD40-PE 334308, CD45-PerCP 304026, CD38-BV711 303528, IgD-APC 348222, CD27-BV421 356418, CD19BV510 302242, CD20-BV711 302342, PE secondary 406421; BD Biosciences: CD24-PerCP-Cy5.5 561647; Abcam: cit-H3 ab5103; Novus: MPO-PerCP NB100-64803PCP; eBioscience: CD66b-APC 1706662; 1 5insight.jci.org https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.124020 Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific: LIVE/DEAD fixable green stain L23101).

Techniques: Clinical Proteomics, Isolation, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Control, In Vitro, Cell Culture

Figure 4. IRF5 homozygous risk donors have elevated numbers of circulating pDCs and spontaneous NETosis. (A and B) Similar to Figure 2, A and B, except freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and pDCs gated as CD45+CD123+BDCA2+. (A) Representative dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws. A is pregated for CD45. (B) The number of circulating pDCs from n = 10 risk and n = 12 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of CD45+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of myeloperoxidase-positive, citrullinated histone H3–positive (MPO+cit-H3+) NETs in donor samples (n = 5 risk and nonrisk). C is pregated on CD66b+ cells. (D) Quantification of NETs from n = 12 risk and n = 14 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage from CD66b+ cells (1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test). (E) The presence of NETs was visualized by plating equal numbers of freshly isolated neutrophils from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and patients with SLE on poly-l-lysine–coated coverslips for 4 hours. Representative images are from stain- ing with Sytox green and DAPI or MPO, Cit-H3, and DAPI. PMA was used as a positive control for NET induction on nonrisk neutrophils (original magnification ×20). Experiments were repeated 3 times (A–E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05.

Journal: JCI insight

Article Title: IRF5 genetic risk variants drive myeloid-specific IRF5 hyperactivation and presymptomatic SLE.

doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.124020

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. IRF5 homozygous risk donors have elevated numbers of circulating pDCs and spontaneous NETosis. (A and B) Similar to Figure 2, A and B, except freshly isolated PBMCs were surface-stained and pDCs gated as CD45+CD123+BDCA2+. (A) Representative dot plots from flow cytometry are shown from a single round of blood draws. A is pregated for CD45. (B) The number of circulating pDCs from n = 10 risk and n = 12 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage of CD45+ gate (unpaired 2-tailed t test). (C) Representative dot plots from flow cytometry analysis of myeloperoxidase-positive, citrullinated histone H3–positive (MPO+cit-H3+) NETs in donor samples (n = 5 risk and nonrisk). C is pregated on CD66b+ cells. (D) Quantification of NETs from n = 12 risk and n = 14 nonrisk donors is shown as a percentage from CD66b+ cells (1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test). (E) The presence of NETs was visualized by plating equal numbers of freshly isolated neutrophils from homozygous nonrisk, risk, and patients with SLE on poly-l-lysine–coated coverslips for 4 hours. Representative images are from stain- ing with Sytox green and DAPI or MPO, Cit-H3, and DAPI. PMA was used as a positive control for NET induction on nonrisk neutrophils (original magnification ×20). Experiments were repeated 3 times (A–E). Single data points represent individual donors. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P ≤ 0.05.

Article Snippet: PBMCs were washed and blocked in PBS supplemented with Fc blocker (422302, BioLegend) for 15 minutes and then stained with antibodies against surface makers for 1 hour (BioLegend: CD303-BV421 354212, CD123-BV510 306022, CD14-PE 301806, CD16-APC Cy7 360710, CD40-PE 334308, CD45-PerCP 304026, CD38-BV711 303528, IgD-APC 348222, CD27-BV421 356418, CD19BV510 302242, CD20-BV711 302342, PE secondary 406421; BD Biosciences: CD24-PerCP-Cy5.5 561647; Abcam: cit-H3 ab5103; Novus: MPO-PerCP NB100-64803PCP; eBioscience: CD66b-APC 1706662; 1 5insight.jci.org https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.124020 Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific: LIVE/DEAD fixable green stain L23101).

Techniques: Isolation, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Positive Control