c fos Search Results


96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc phospho c fos ser32 d82c12 xp rabbit mab
Phospho C Fos Ser32 D82c12 Xp Rabbit Mab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/phospho c fos ser32 d82c12 xp rabbit mab/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phospho c fos ser32 d82c12 xp rabbit mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology rabbit polyclonal anti c fos antibody
Rabbit Polyclonal Anti C Fos Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit polyclonal anti c fos antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit polyclonal anti c fos antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc c fos
C Fos, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c fos/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c fos - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals mouse anti c fos
Mouse Anti C Fos, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti c fos/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti c fos - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech c fos
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
C Fos, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c fos/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c fos - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals rabbit anti fos antibody
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
Rabbit Anti Fos Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti fos antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti fos antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
PhosphoSolutions antic fos antibody
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
Antic Fos Antibody, supplied by PhosphoSolutions, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antic fos antibody/product/PhosphoSolutions
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antic fos antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals c fos antibody
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
C Fos Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c fos antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c fos antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals c fos
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
C Fos, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c fos/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c fos - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Novus Biologicals nb110 75039
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
Nb110 75039, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nb110 75039/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nb110 75039 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech anti c fos antibody proteintech 26192 1 ap
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
Anti C Fos Antibody Proteintech 26192 1 Ap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti c fos antibody proteintech 26192 1 ap/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti c fos antibody proteintech 26192 1 ap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals anti c fos primary antibody
Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. <t>a)</t> <t>c‐Fos</t> expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.
Anti C Fos Primary Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti c fos primary antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti c fos primary antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. a) c‐Fos expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Astrocytic PCBP1 Suppresses Ferroptosis to Restore Glutamatergic Homeostasis and Mitigate Stress‐Induced Depression in Male Mice

doi: 10.1002/advs.202513438

Figure Lengend Snippet: Astrocytic PCBP1 enhances glutamatergic neuronal activity and neurophysiology. a) c‐Fos expression in vHip of mice following CUMS. Above: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Below: Representative images and quantification of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons. Scale bars = 50 µm. n = 9 slices from 3 animals per group. b) Timeline of fiber photometry recording Ca 2+ and glutamate signals from vHip c) Left: Representative images validate GCaMP6s expression in vHip. Scale bar = 500 µm. Right: Representative images showing the overlap between GCaMP6s‐expressing cells (green) and glutamatergic neurons (violet). Scale bar = 50 µm. d) Representative images of c‐Fos‐positive glutamatergic neurons. Scale bars = 100 or 20 µm. e) Statistical analysis of c‐Fos co‐labeled glutamatergic neuron in vHip of mice. f) Schematic of fiber photometry recording in TST and representative Ca 2+ signals photometric traces in response to the TST during struggling and immobility phases. Scale bars = 10 s. g) Ca 2 ⁺ signal recording in vHip during TST. Left: Representative heatmaps showing Ca 2 ⁺ signal in response to TST during struggling. Right: Z‐score traces and quantification of average Z‐scores during TST. n = 5 mice per group. h) Representative images of the AAV vectors engineered to express the glutamate sensor iGluSnFR under the hSyn promoter in the vHip. Scale bars = 500 µm / 50 µm. i) Representative trace of glutamate signal event detection during TST. Red dots indicate detected events. j) Event‐based quantification. Event frequency (left), AUC (middle) and decay tau (right). n = 5 mice per group. k) Timeline of electrophysiological recordings from vHip glutamatergic neurons. l) Quantification of mEPSC frequency (left) and amplitude (right) recorded from vHip glutamatergic neurons. n = 10–12 cells from 3 mice per group. m) Left: Evoked firing rates of action potentials recorded from eGFP⁺ neurons in the vHip. Right: Quantifications of rheobase and resting membrane potential recorded from eGFP + neurons in vHip. n = 10 cells from 3 mice per group. Statistical analyses included unpaired t‐test, one‐way/two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test and Kruskal‐Wallis test. Data are presented as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: For immunofluorescence analysis, the 30‐μm‐thick sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against NEUN (94403S, Cell Signaling Technology), GFAP (GB11096, Servicebio), IBA‐1 (GB12105, Servicebio), CaMKII (11533‐1‐AP, Proteintech), GAD67 (PA5‐21397, Invitrogen), c‐Fos (OB‐PGP080, Oasis biogarm), GPX4 (ab125066, Abcam), and PCBP1 (14523‐1‐AP, Proteintech).

Techniques: Activity Assay, Expressing, Labeling, Membrane