beta app Search Results


93
StressMarq fibrils stressmarq biosciences spr 487
Fibrils Stressmarq Biosciences Spr 487, supplied by StressMarq, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fibrils stressmarq biosciences spr 487/product/StressMarq
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fibrils stressmarq biosciences spr 487 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProSci Incorporated anti app
Anti App, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti app/product/ProSci Incorporated
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti app - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cusabio human aβ42 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa kit
GAA facilitates <t>Aβ42</t> degradation in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GLT, and GLP at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using <t>ELISA.</t> Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0016; GLT-10 vs. Control: p =0.0005; GLT-30 vs. Control: p = 0.001; n = 3. ( B ) Aβ42 uptake by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GLT at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GAA, GAD, and GAG, respectively, at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. ( C ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0002; GAA-5 vs. Control: p = 0.0132; GAA-20 vs. Control: 0.0002; n = 3. ( D ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0021; n = 3. ( E ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( F ) Uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GAA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by fluorescence signal 1-height (FL1-H) of flow cytometry. Results were normalized to total cellular protein level, and DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. indicated control.
Human Aβ42 Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay Elisa Kit, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human aβ42 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa kit/product/Cusabio
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human aβ42 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech app antibody
GAA facilitates <t>Aβ42</t> degradation in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GLT, and GLP at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using <t>ELISA.</t> Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0016; GLT-10 vs. Control: p =0.0005; GLT-30 vs. Control: p = 0.001; n = 3. ( B ) Aβ42 uptake by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GLT at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GAA, GAD, and GAG, respectively, at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. ( C ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0002; GAA-5 vs. Control: p = 0.0132; GAA-20 vs. Control: 0.0002; n = 3. ( D ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0021; n = 3. ( E ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( F ) Uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GAA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by fluorescence signal 1-height (FL1-H) of flow cytometry. Results were normalized to total cellular protein level, and DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. indicated control.
App Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/app antibody/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
app antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Proteintech anti app
GAA facilitates <t>Aβ42</t> degradation in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GLT, and GLP at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using <t>ELISA.</t> Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0016; GLT-10 vs. Control: p =0.0005; GLT-30 vs. Control: p = 0.001; n = 3. ( B ) Aβ42 uptake by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GLT at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GAA, GAD, and GAG, respectively, at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. ( C ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0002; GAA-5 vs. Control: p = 0.0132; GAA-20 vs. Control: 0.0002; n = 3. ( D ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0021; n = 3. ( E ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( F ) Uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GAA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by fluorescence signal 1-height (FL1-H) of flow cytometry. Results were normalized to total cellular protein level, and DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. indicated control.
Anti App, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti app/product/Proteintech
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti app - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
StressMarq oc antiamyloid fibrils antibody
GAA facilitates <t>Aβ42</t> degradation in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GLT, and GLP at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using <t>ELISA.</t> Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0016; GLT-10 vs. Control: p =0.0005; GLT-30 vs. Control: p = 0.001; n = 3. ( B ) Aβ42 uptake by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GLT at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GAA, GAD, and GAG, respectively, at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. ( C ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0002; GAA-5 vs. Control: p = 0.0132; GAA-20 vs. Control: 0.0002; n = 3. ( D ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0021; n = 3. ( E ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( F ) Uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GAA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by fluorescence signal 1-height (FL1-H) of flow cytometry. Results were normalized to total cellular protein level, and DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. indicated control.
Oc Antiamyloid Fibrils Antibody, supplied by StressMarq, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/oc antiamyloid fibrils antibody/product/StressMarq
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oc antiamyloid fibrils antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
StressMarq a11 oligomers
( a-c ) Recombinant purified myc-αSyn was shaken at 37°C in presence of concentrated extracellular medium from mouse cortical neuron cultures collected over 7 days (DIV 42-49), generated either from wild type (WT) mice, or from Tg x2 -αSyn A53T mice with or without lentiviral expression of VAMP7 dominant-negative fragment (VAMP7 DN ; infected at DIV 7). Aggregation of myc-αSyn was analyzed at the indicated days of incubation by the following assays: ( a ) Congo-red derivative, amyloid-binding dye K114 fluorescence at 390/535 nm (n=4). ( b ) Amyloid-binding dye Thioflavin-T fluorescence at 450/485 nm (n=4). ( c ) Quantitative immunoblotting for the myc epitope-tag, where aggregation is measured as disappearance of monomeric myc-αSyn (top; n=4); dot-blotting for filamentous myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Fila antibody (middle; n=4); and dot-blotting for amyloid-type myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Amyl <t>A11</t> antibody (bottom; n=4). All data represent means ± SEM, where each ‘n’ is an independent aggregation experiment. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 by RM 2-way ANOVA.
A11 Oligomers, supplied by StressMarq, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/a11 oligomers/product/StressMarq
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
a11 oligomers - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc nab228 antibody
( a-c ) Recombinant purified myc-αSyn was shaken at 37°C in presence of concentrated extracellular medium from mouse cortical neuron cultures collected over 7 days (DIV 42-49), generated either from wild type (WT) mice, or from Tg x2 -αSyn A53T mice with or without lentiviral expression of VAMP7 dominant-negative fragment (VAMP7 DN ; infected at DIV 7). Aggregation of myc-αSyn was analyzed at the indicated days of incubation by the following assays: ( a ) Congo-red derivative, amyloid-binding dye K114 fluorescence at 390/535 nm (n=4). ( b ) Amyloid-binding dye Thioflavin-T fluorescence at 450/485 nm (n=4). ( c ) Quantitative immunoblotting for the myc epitope-tag, where aggregation is measured as disappearance of monomeric myc-αSyn (top; n=4); dot-blotting for filamentous myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Fila antibody (middle; n=4); and dot-blotting for amyloid-type myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Amyl <t>A11</t> antibody (bottom; n=4). All data represent means ± SEM, where each ‘n’ is an independent aggregation experiment. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 by RM 2-way ANOVA.
Nab228 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/nab228 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
nab228 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
StressMarq oligomeric
( a-c ) Recombinant purified myc-αSyn was shaken at 37°C in presence of concentrated extracellular medium from mouse cortical neuron cultures collected over 7 days (DIV 42-49), generated either from wild type (WT) mice, or from Tg x2 -αSyn A53T mice with or without lentiviral expression of VAMP7 dominant-negative fragment (VAMP7 DN ; infected at DIV 7). Aggregation of myc-αSyn was analyzed at the indicated days of incubation by the following assays: ( a ) Congo-red derivative, amyloid-binding dye K114 fluorescence at 390/535 nm (n=4). ( b ) Amyloid-binding dye Thioflavin-T fluorescence at 450/485 nm (n=4). ( c ) Quantitative immunoblotting for the myc epitope-tag, where aggregation is measured as disappearance of monomeric myc-αSyn (top; n=4); dot-blotting for filamentous myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Fila antibody (middle; n=4); and dot-blotting for amyloid-type myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Amyl <t>A11</t> antibody (bottom; n=4). All data represent means ± SEM, where each ‘n’ is an independent aggregation experiment. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 by RM 2-way ANOVA.
Oligomeric, supplied by StressMarq, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/oligomeric/product/StressMarq
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oligomeric - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Boster Bio beta amyloid
( a-c ) Recombinant purified myc-αSyn was shaken at 37°C in presence of concentrated extracellular medium from mouse cortical neuron cultures collected over 7 days (DIV 42-49), generated either from wild type (WT) mice, or from Tg x2 -αSyn A53T mice with or without lentiviral expression of VAMP7 dominant-negative fragment (VAMP7 DN ; infected at DIV 7). Aggregation of myc-αSyn was analyzed at the indicated days of incubation by the following assays: ( a ) Congo-red derivative, amyloid-binding dye K114 fluorescence at 390/535 nm (n=4). ( b ) Amyloid-binding dye Thioflavin-T fluorescence at 450/485 nm (n=4). ( c ) Quantitative immunoblotting for the myc epitope-tag, where aggregation is measured as disappearance of monomeric myc-αSyn (top; n=4); dot-blotting for filamentous myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Fila antibody (middle; n=4); and dot-blotting for amyloid-type myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Amyl <t>A11</t> antibody (bottom; n=4). All data represent means ± SEM, where each ‘n’ is an independent aggregation experiment. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 by RM 2-way ANOVA.
Beta Amyloid, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/beta amyloid/product/Boster Bio
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
beta amyloid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boster Bio app
List of primary and secondary <t> antibodies </t> used in the study.
App, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/app/product/Boster Bio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
app - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
OriGene app myc ddk tagged human amyloid beta
List of primary and secondary <t> antibodies </t> used in the study.
App Myc Ddk Tagged Human Amyloid Beta, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/app myc ddk tagged human amyloid beta/product/OriGene
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
app myc ddk tagged human amyloid beta - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


GAA facilitates Aβ42 degradation in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GLT, and GLP at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0016; GLT-10 vs. Control: p =0.0005; GLT-30 vs. Control: p = 0.001; n = 3. ( B ) Aβ42 uptake by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GLT at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GAA, GAD, and GAG, respectively, at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. ( C ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0002; GAA-5 vs. Control: p = 0.0132; GAA-20 vs. Control: 0.0002; n = 3. ( D ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0021; n = 3. ( E ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( F ) Uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GAA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by fluorescence signal 1-height (FL1-H) of flow cytometry. Results were normalized to total cellular protein level, and DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. indicated control.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Ganoderic Acid A Promotes Amyloid-β Clearance (In Vitro) and Ameliorates Cognitive Deficiency in Alzheimer’s Disease (Mouse Model) through Autophagy Induced by Activating Axl

doi: 10.3390/ijms22115559

Figure Lengend Snippet: GAA facilitates Aβ42 degradation in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GLT, and GLP at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0016; GLT-10 vs. Control: p =0.0005; GLT-30 vs. Control: p = 0.001; n = 3. ( B ) Aβ42 uptake by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GLT at the indicated concentrations for 24 h. Accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by flow cytometry. n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with Rog (10 µM), GAA, GAD, and GAG, respectively, at the indicated concentrations in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured using ELISA. ( C ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0002; GAA-5 vs. Control: p = 0.0132; GAA-20 vs. Control: 0.0002; n = 3. ( D ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0021; n = 3. ( E ) Rog vs. Control: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( F ) Uptake of Aβ42 by BV2 was assessed by applying FITC-labeled Aβ42 (1 µM) to BV2 cells in the presence of Rog (10 µM) and GAA at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and accumulation of the fluorophore was analyzed by fluorescence signal 1-height (FL1-H) of flow cytometry. Results were normalized to total cellular protein level, and DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. indicated control.

Article Snippet: The human Aβ42 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was purchase from Cusabio (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control, Labeling, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence

GAA promotes Aβ42 elimination through the autophagy pathway in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM), the indicated antagonists of ADEs (arachidonic acid at 80 µM, sacubitrilat at 50 µM, enalapril maleate at 50 µM), autophagosomes (EACC at 2 µM) and lysosomes (chloroquine at 20 µM), in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured by ELISA. GAA + EACC vs. GAA: p = 0.0122; GAA + Chl vs. GAA: p = 0.0075; n = 3. ( B ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM) for the indicated periods of time, and whole cell proteins were collected for western blot. 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0219; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0467; n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM) for the indicated times, and expression of Atg5, Becn1 and Map1lc3b was analyzed by qRT-PCR. ( C ) 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0075; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0002; 24 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0069; n = 3. ( D ) 3 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0015; 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0007; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0006; 24 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0017; n = 3. ( E ) 3 h vs. 0: p = 0.0086; 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0001; 12 h vs. 0 h: p < 0.0001; 24 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0286; n = 3. ( F ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM), the indicated agonist of AKT/PI3K (recilisib at 20 µM) and EACC (2 µM) for 6 h, and whole cell proteins were collected for western blot. GAA vs. Control: p = 0.0288; GAA + Recilisib vs. GAA: p = 0.0004; n = 3. ( G ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM), recilisib (20 µM) and EACC (2 µM), in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured by ELISA. DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. GAA vs. Control: p = 0.0031; GAA + EACC vs. GAA: p = 0.0064; n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. indicated control.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Ganoderic Acid A Promotes Amyloid-β Clearance (In Vitro) and Ameliorates Cognitive Deficiency in Alzheimer’s Disease (Mouse Model) through Autophagy Induced by Activating Axl

doi: 10.3390/ijms22115559

Figure Lengend Snippet: GAA promotes Aβ42 elimination through the autophagy pathway in microglial cells. ( A ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM), the indicated antagonists of ADEs (arachidonic acid at 80 µM, sacubitrilat at 50 µM, enalapril maleate at 50 µM), autophagosomes (EACC at 2 µM) and lysosomes (chloroquine at 20 µM), in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured by ELISA. GAA + EACC vs. GAA: p = 0.0122; GAA + Chl vs. GAA: p = 0.0075; n = 3. ( B ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM) for the indicated periods of time, and whole cell proteins were collected for western blot. 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0219; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0467; n = 3. ( C – E ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM) for the indicated times, and expression of Atg5, Becn1 and Map1lc3b was analyzed by qRT-PCR. ( C ) 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0075; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0002; 24 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0069; n = 3. ( D ) 3 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0015; 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0007; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0006; 24 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0017; n = 3. ( E ) 3 h vs. 0: p = 0.0086; 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0001; 12 h vs. 0 h: p < 0.0001; 24 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0286; n = 3. ( F ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM), the indicated agonist of AKT/PI3K (recilisib at 20 µM) and EACC (2 µM) for 6 h, and whole cell proteins were collected for western blot. GAA vs. Control: p = 0.0288; GAA + Recilisib vs. GAA: p = 0.0004; n = 3. ( G ) BV2 cells were treated with GAA (20 µM), recilisib (20 µM) and EACC (2 µM), in the presence of Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h, and intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured by ELISA. DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. GAA vs. Control: p = 0.0031; GAA + EACC vs. GAA: p = 0.0064; n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. indicated control.

Article Snippet: The human Aβ42 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was purchase from Cusabio (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control

GAA activates the autophagy pathway through Axl. BV2 cells were ( A ) treated with GAA at the indicated concentrations for 6 h or ( B ) treated with GAA (20 µM) for the indicated periods of time, and whole cell proteins were collected for Western blot. ( A ) GAA-5 vs. DMSO: p = 0.0452; GAA-20 vs. DMSO: p = 0.0034; n = 3. ( B ) 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0299; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0073; n = 3. ( C – F ) BV2 cells were pretreated with 0.1% DMSO or the indicated Axl antagonist (R428 at 5 µM) for 30 min, followed by administration of GAA (20 µM) and Aβ42 (2 µM) for 6 h. Whole cell proteins then were collected for Western blot. ( D ) Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p <0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p < 0.0001; n = 3. ( E ) Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.028; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0304; n = 3. ( F ) Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0247; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( G – H ) BV2 cells were pretreated with R428 (5 µM) for 30 min, followed by administration of FITC-Aβ42 (1 μM) and GAA (20 µM) for 6 h, and cells were immunostained with LysoTracker Red. Representative images show the co-localization of Aβ42 and lysosomes (yellow). Scale bar: 50 µm. Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0469; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA p = 0.0057; n = 4. ( I ) BV2 cells were pretreated with the indicated antagonists of Axl (R428 at 5 µM) and Pak1 (IPA-3 at 20 µM), followed by administration of GAA (20 µM) and Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h. The intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured by ELISA. DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. GAA vs. Control: p = 0.0012; GAA + R428 vs. GAA: p = 0.0151; GAA + IPA vs. GAA: p = 0.0015; n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. indicated control.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Ganoderic Acid A Promotes Amyloid-β Clearance (In Vitro) and Ameliorates Cognitive Deficiency in Alzheimer’s Disease (Mouse Model) through Autophagy Induced by Activating Axl

doi: 10.3390/ijms22115559

Figure Lengend Snippet: GAA activates the autophagy pathway through Axl. BV2 cells were ( A ) treated with GAA at the indicated concentrations for 6 h or ( B ) treated with GAA (20 µM) for the indicated periods of time, and whole cell proteins were collected for Western blot. ( A ) GAA-5 vs. DMSO: p = 0.0452; GAA-20 vs. DMSO: p = 0.0034; n = 3. ( B ) 6 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0299; 12 h vs. 0 h: p = 0.0073; n = 3. ( C – F ) BV2 cells were pretreated with 0.1% DMSO or the indicated Axl antagonist (R428 at 5 µM) for 30 min, followed by administration of GAA (20 µM) and Aβ42 (2 µM) for 6 h. Whole cell proteins then were collected for Western blot. ( D ) Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p <0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p < 0.0001; n = 3. ( E ) Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.028; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0304; n = 3. ( F ) Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0247; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0009; n = 3. ( G – H ) BV2 cells were pretreated with R428 (5 µM) for 30 min, followed by administration of FITC-Aβ42 (1 μM) and GAA (20 µM) for 6 h, and cells were immunostained with LysoTracker Red. Representative images show the co-localization of Aβ42 and lysosomes (yellow). Scale bar: 50 µm. Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0469; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA p = 0.0057; n = 4. ( I ) BV2 cells were pretreated with the indicated antagonists of Axl (R428 at 5 µM) and Pak1 (IPA-3 at 20 µM), followed by administration of GAA (20 µM) and Aβ42 (2 µM) for 24 h. The intracellular Aβ42 levels were measured by ELISA. DMSO at 0.1% was used as the control. GAA vs. Control: p = 0.0012; GAA + R428 vs. GAA: p = 0.0151; GAA + IPA vs. GAA: p = 0.0015; n = 3. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. indicated control.

Article Snippet: The human Aβ42 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was purchase from Cusabio (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control

GAA ameliorates Aβ42-induced behavioral deficits in Aβ-injected mice through Axl. ( A ) Experimental design for the animal study. Cerebroventricular injection of aggregated Aβ42 (82 pmol/µL, 5 µL/mouse) was applied to 8-week-old mice. ( B ) Representative motion track and ( C ) the discrimination index in the object recognition test. Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0019; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0101; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0038; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0078; n = 8 ( D ) Escape latency during spatial-acquisition training. (Day2) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0011; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0303; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0304; n = 8. (Day3) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0019; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0028; n = 8. (Day4) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; n = 8. (Day5) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0004; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0002; n = 8. ( E ) Representative motion track, ( F ) the platform-crossing number, (Aβ42 vs. Sham: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p < 0.0001; n = 8.) ( G ) distance in the target quadrant (Aβ42 vs. Sham: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0004; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42 p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0002; n = 8.) and ( H ) time spent in the target quadrant (Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p =0.0003; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0001; n = 8.) in the spatial-probe test. ( I ) Aβ42 level in the hippocampus detected by ELISA. Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0014; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0064; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0266; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0053; n = 8. ( J ) LC3B level in the hippocampus detected by IHC assessment. Images were obtained under a microscope (scale bar: 100 μm). Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0004; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0009; n = 4. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001 vs. Sham group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. Aβ42 group ( n = 8 mice/ group).

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Article Title: Ganoderic Acid A Promotes Amyloid-β Clearance (In Vitro) and Ameliorates Cognitive Deficiency in Alzheimer’s Disease (Mouse Model) through Autophagy Induced by Activating Axl

doi: 10.3390/ijms22115559

Figure Lengend Snippet: GAA ameliorates Aβ42-induced behavioral deficits in Aβ-injected mice through Axl. ( A ) Experimental design for the animal study. Cerebroventricular injection of aggregated Aβ42 (82 pmol/µL, 5 µL/mouse) was applied to 8-week-old mice. ( B ) Representative motion track and ( C ) the discrimination index in the object recognition test. Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0019; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0101; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0038; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0078; n = 8 ( D ) Escape latency during spatial-acquisition training. (Day2) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0011; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0303; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0304; n = 8. (Day3) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0019; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0028; n = 8. (Day4) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; n = 8. (Day5) Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0004; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0002; n = 8. ( E ) Representative motion track, ( F ) the platform-crossing number, (Aβ42 vs. Sham: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p < 0.0001; n = 8.) ( G ) distance in the target quadrant (Aβ42 vs. Sham: p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0004; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42 p < 0.0001; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0002; n = 8.) and ( H ) time spent in the target quadrant (Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0002; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p =0.0003; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0001; n = 8.) in the spatial-probe test. ( I ) Aβ42 level in the hippocampus detected by ELISA. Aβ42 vs. Sham: p = 0.0014; Aβ42 + Rog vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0064; Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0266; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0053; n = 8. ( J ) LC3B level in the hippocampus detected by IHC assessment. Images were obtained under a microscope (scale bar: 100 μm). Aβ42 + GAA vs. Aβ42: p = 0.0004; Aβ42 + GAA + R428 vs. Aβ42 + GAA: p = 0.0009; n = 4. n is the number of replicates (biological and technical) used for each of the described results. ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, #### p < 0.0001 vs. Sham group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. Aβ42 group ( n = 8 mice/ group).

Article Snippet: The human Aβ42 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was purchase from Cusabio (Wuhan, China).

Techniques: Injection, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Microscopy

( a-c ) Recombinant purified myc-αSyn was shaken at 37°C in presence of concentrated extracellular medium from mouse cortical neuron cultures collected over 7 days (DIV 42-49), generated either from wild type (WT) mice, or from Tg x2 -αSyn A53T mice with or without lentiviral expression of VAMP7 dominant-negative fragment (VAMP7 DN ; infected at DIV 7). Aggregation of myc-αSyn was analyzed at the indicated days of incubation by the following assays: ( a ) Congo-red derivative, amyloid-binding dye K114 fluorescence at 390/535 nm (n=4). ( b ) Amyloid-binding dye Thioflavin-T fluorescence at 450/485 nm (n=4). ( c ) Quantitative immunoblotting for the myc epitope-tag, where aggregation is measured as disappearance of monomeric myc-αSyn (top; n=4); dot-blotting for filamentous myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Fila antibody (middle; n=4); and dot-blotting for amyloid-type myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Amyl A11 antibody (bottom; n=4). All data represent means ± SEM, where each ‘n’ is an independent aggregation experiment. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 by RM 2-way ANOVA.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Lysosomal Exocytosis Releases Pathogenic α-Synuclein Species from Neurons

doi: 10.1101/2021.04.10.439302

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a-c ) Recombinant purified myc-αSyn was shaken at 37°C in presence of concentrated extracellular medium from mouse cortical neuron cultures collected over 7 days (DIV 42-49), generated either from wild type (WT) mice, or from Tg x2 -αSyn A53T mice with or without lentiviral expression of VAMP7 dominant-negative fragment (VAMP7 DN ; infected at DIV 7). Aggregation of myc-αSyn was analyzed at the indicated days of incubation by the following assays: ( a ) Congo-red derivative, amyloid-binding dye K114 fluorescence at 390/535 nm (n=4). ( b ) Amyloid-binding dye Thioflavin-T fluorescence at 450/485 nm (n=4). ( c ) Quantitative immunoblotting for the myc epitope-tag, where aggregation is measured as disappearance of monomeric myc-αSyn (top; n=4); dot-blotting for filamentous myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Fila antibody (middle; n=4); and dot-blotting for amyloid-type myc-αSyn aggregates using αSyn Amyl A11 antibody (bottom; n=4). All data represent means ± SEM, where each ‘n’ is an independent aggregation experiment. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001 by RM 2-way ANOVA.

Article Snippet: β-Actin: Sigma (A1978); A11 oligomers: Stressmarq (SPC-506D); ATP5G: Abcam (ab181243); Calreticulin: Thermo Fisher (OTI15F5) and Novus (NB600-103); Cathepsin-L: Novus (JM10-78); CD81: Novus (SN206-01); EEA1: Thermo Fisher (MA5-14794); Flag: Sigma Cl.

Techniques: Recombinant, Purification, Generated, Expressing, Dominant Negative Mutation, Infection, Incubation, Binding Assay, Fluorescence, Western Blot

List of primary and secondary  antibodies  used in the study.

Journal: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Article Title: Adapentpronitrile, a New Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitor, Ameliorates Diabetic Neuronal Injury Through Inhibiting Mitochondria-Related Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis

doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00214

Figure Lengend Snippet: List of primary and secondary antibodies used in the study.

Article Snippet: Membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies for specific detection of APP (dilution 1:500; Boster, China, BA0581), Aβ (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab62658), GLP-1R (dilution 1:500, Bioss, China, bs-1559R), Bcl-2 (dilution 1:500; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab196495), Bax (dilution 1:400; Proteintech, China, 50599-2-Ig), cytochrome c (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab133504), caspase-9 (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab184786), caspase-3 (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab184787), and β-actin (dilution 1:3000; Proteintech, United States, 60008-1-Ig; Table ).

Techniques:

Effects of adapentpronitrile on pathomorphology and the expression of APP and Aβ proteins in hippocampus and cortex of rat. (A) Representative neuronal pathomorphology in hippocampus and cortex. Sections were pictured at 400×. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) The expressions of APP and Aβ proteins were measured by Western Blotting. Data were expressed as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, and were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett-t type multiple comparison tests. # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 vs. Control group, respectively; ∗ P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01 vs. HFD/STZ group, respectively.

Journal: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Article Title: Adapentpronitrile, a New Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitor, Ameliorates Diabetic Neuronal Injury Through Inhibiting Mitochondria-Related Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis

doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00214

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of adapentpronitrile on pathomorphology and the expression of APP and Aβ proteins in hippocampus and cortex of rat. (A) Representative neuronal pathomorphology in hippocampus and cortex. Sections were pictured at 400×. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) The expressions of APP and Aβ proteins were measured by Western Blotting. Data were expressed as mean ± SD of four independent experiments, and were analyzed statistically using one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett-t type multiple comparison tests. # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 vs. Control group, respectively; ∗ P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01 vs. HFD/STZ group, respectively.

Article Snippet: Membranes were probed overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies for specific detection of APP (dilution 1:500; Boster, China, BA0581), Aβ (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab62658), GLP-1R (dilution 1:500, Bioss, China, bs-1559R), Bcl-2 (dilution 1:500; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab196495), Bax (dilution 1:400; Proteintech, China, 50599-2-Ig), cytochrome c (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab133504), caspase-9 (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab184786), caspase-3 (dilution 1:1000; Abcam, United Kingdom, ab184787), and β-actin (dilution 1:3000; Proteintech, United States, 60008-1-Ig; Table ).

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Comparison, Control