b 250 Search Results


90
ATCC triclosan adapted s aureus atcc 6538 scv
Triclosan Adapted S Aureus Atcc 6538 Scv, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/10__1128_slash_aac__00352___15-116-2-5?v=ATCC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
triclosan adapted s aureus atcc 6538 scv - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Alomone Labs cholesterol
FIGURE 1 (a) Workflow of data mining. The TMR (transmembrane sequence +5 amino acid residues from each N- and C-terminal sides) of curated entries found in UniProt using the code for tyrosine-kinase receptor family (2.7.10.1) were screened for the presence of <t>cholesterol</t> recognition and alignment consensus (CRAC and CARC). The incidence of CRAC and CARC motifs in (b) human, (c) mouse, (d) zebrafish, (e) fruit fly, and (f) C. elegans TMR of RTK family members. (g) Library of CRAC and CARC sequences (all combinations used can be found in the stored data). Residue sequence predicted to be embedded into the cell membrane shown in yellow
Cholesterol, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pm33825223-77-30-24?v=Alomone+Labs
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cholesterol - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Alomone Labs recombinant human bdnf protein rhbdnf
Western blot analysis of the <t>BDNF</t> ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the prefrontal (prelimbic/infralimbic) cortex of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. ***: p < 0.001 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).
Recombinant Human Bdnf Protein Rhbdnf, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pmc12384143-180-17-24?v=Alomone+Labs
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human bdnf protein rhbdnf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech rabbit anti nogo
Interactions between tubule-forming proteins and FIT2. (A) IP of FIT2-HA in WT and FIT2-HA KI HepG2 cells. WT and FIT2-HA KI cells were lysed in 1% digitonin-containing buffer. IP was performed with anti-HA antibodies. The samples were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (B) coIP of FIT2 and ER tubule-forming proteins in HepG2 cells. IP was performed as in A. Samples were analyzed by IB with antibodies of different ER membrane proteins. (C) FIT2-HA and REEP5-Myc were cotransfected into HEK293T cells and solubilized in triton-containing buffer or transfected individually into cells in different dishes, followed by mixing of the Triton-solubilized cell extracts. IP was performed with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibodies. (D) As in C, but with cells expressing FIT2-HA and/or GFP-Rtn4a. The asterisk (*) indicates degraded GFP-Rtn4a. (E) coIP of FIT2 truncations and <t>Rtn4/REEP5.</t> HEK293T cells expressing FIT2-HA, FIT2 truncations, or empty vector were lysed in 1% Triton-containing buffer and cell lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies.
Rabbit Anti Nogo, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pmc08056755-274-10-15?v=Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti nogo - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
MACHEREY NAGEL mn bead tube type a
Interactions between tubule-forming proteins and FIT2. (A) IP of FIT2-HA in WT and FIT2-HA KI HepG2 cells. WT and FIT2-HA KI cells were lysed in 1% digitonin-containing buffer. IP was performed with anti-HA antibodies. The samples were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (B) coIP of FIT2 and ER tubule-forming proteins in HepG2 cells. IP was performed as in A. Samples were analyzed by IB with antibodies of different ER membrane proteins. (C) FIT2-HA and REEP5-Myc were cotransfected into HEK293T cells and solubilized in triton-containing buffer or transfected individually into cells in different dishes, followed by mixing of the Triton-solubilized cell extracts. IP was performed with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibodies. (D) As in C, but with cells expressing FIT2-HA and/or GFP-Rtn4a. The asterisk (*) indicates degraded GFP-Rtn4a. (E) coIP of FIT2 truncations and <t>Rtn4/REEP5.</t> HEK293T cells expressing FIT2-HA, FIT2 truncations, or empty vector were lysed in 1% Triton-containing buffer and cell lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies.
Mn Bead Tube Type A, supplied by MACHEREY NAGEL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pmc09427195-39-22-27?v=MACHEREY+NAGEL
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mn bead tube type a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech rabbit anti rtn4 polyclonal antibody
BMM (treated with siRNA to either CLIMP-63 or <t>RTN4</t> or treated with control siRNA, Ctr) were infected with L. donovani or L. amazonensis metacyclic promastigotes and at various time points post-phagocytosis parasite replication and PV size were assessed. (A) Quantification of L. donovani parasite burden in CLIMP-63 depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (B) Quantification of L. amazonensis parasite burden in CLIMP-63 depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (C) Quantification of PV size in CLIMP-63-depleted BMM infected with L. amazonensis at 48 and 72 h post-phagocytosis. (D) Quantification of L. donovani parasite burden in RTN4-depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (E) Quantification of L. amazonensis parasite burden in RTN4-depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (F) Quantification of PV size in RTN4-depleted BMM infected with L. amazonensis at 48 and 72 h post-phagocytosis. Data in (A, B, D, E) are presented as the means ± SEM of values of one representative experiment of three independent experiments. Data in (C, F) are presented as a violin plot with means ± standard deviations (SD) of values from three independent experiments for a total of 450 PVs. Statistics were calculated using one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s multiple comparison test with * P ≤ 0.05, *** P ≤ 0.001 and **** P ≤ 0.0001 significance. Blots showing the efficacy the siRNA-mediated CLIMP-63 and RTN4 knockdowns are shown in S3 Fig and S4 Fig, respectively.
Rabbit Anti Rtn4 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__03__19__712868-129-12-33?v=Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti rtn4 polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProSci Incorporated a201
Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) <t>A201</t> against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
A201, supplied by ProSci Incorporated, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pmc03374081-340-11-12?v=ProSci+Incorporated
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
a201 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
MACHEREY NAGEL g l hydrophobic beads
Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) <t>A201</t> against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
G L Hydrophobic Beads, supplied by MACHEREY NAGEL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pmc04602142-74-8-14?v=MACHEREY+NAGEL
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
g l hydrophobic beads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
MACHEREY NAGEL ceramic beads
Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) <t>A201</t> against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
Ceramic Beads, supplied by MACHEREY NAGEL, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pmc11399119-264-15-19?v=MACHEREY+NAGEL
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ceramic beads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare european pharmacopoeia
Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) <t>A201</t> against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
European Pharmacopoeia, supplied by European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/ejnmmipharmchem__springeropen__com_slash_articles_slash_10__1186_slash_s41181___019___0067___2-93-7-33?v=European+Directorate+for+the+Quality+of+Medicines+and+HealthCare
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
european pharmacopoeia - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International tetracycline
Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) <t>A201</t> against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
Tetracycline, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/pm40207400-107-18-35?v=Chem+Impex+International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tetracycline - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Chem Impex International erythromycin
Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) <t>A201</t> against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001
Erythromycin, supplied by Chem Impex International, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/b+250/10__1128_slash_aac__02360___18-138-24-37?v=Chem+Impex+International
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
erythromycin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FIGURE 1 (a) Workflow of data mining. The TMR (transmembrane sequence +5 amino acid residues from each N- and C-terminal sides) of curated entries found in UniProt using the code for tyrosine-kinase receptor family (2.7.10.1) were screened for the presence of cholesterol recognition and alignment consensus (CRAC and CARC). The incidence of CRAC and CARC motifs in (b) human, (c) mouse, (d) zebrafish, (e) fruit fly, and (f) C. elegans TMR of RTK family members. (g) Library of CRAC and CARC sequences (all combinations used can be found in the stored data). Residue sequence predicted to be embedded into the cell membrane shown in yellow

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

Article Title: Cholesterol-recognition motifs in the transmembrane domain of the tyrosine kinase receptor family: The case of TRKB.

doi: 10.1111/ejn.15218

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 1 (a) Workflow of data mining. The TMR (transmembrane sequence +5 amino acid residues from each N- and C-terminal sides) of curated entries found in UniProt using the code for tyrosine-kinase receptor family (2.7.10.1) were screened for the presence of cholesterol recognition and alignment consensus (CRAC and CARC). The incidence of CRAC and CARC motifs in (b) human, (c) mouse, (d) zebrafish, (e) fruit fly, and (f) C. elegans TMR of RTK family members. (g) Library of CRAC and CARC sequences (all combinations used can be found in the stored data). Residue sequence predicted to be embedded into the cell membrane shown in yellow

Article Snippet: The plates were washed 3× with PBS buffer, and a mixture of biotinylated BDNF (bBDNF: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 ng/ml, Alomone Labs, #B- 250- B) and cholesterol (0, 20, 50 or 100 μM) was added for 1h at room temperature, followed by washing with PBS.

Techniques: Sequencing, Residue, Membrane

FIGURE 3 TRKB interaction with cholesterol. (a,b) Snapshots of the interaction between TRKB and cholesterol at the TMR (see supplement video) indicating that cholesterol (orange) interacts with the OH- group (red) in Y433 (cyan) of the TRKB.TMR (green). The TRKB.TMR helix is shown in the cartoon, the lipids and Y433 sidechain in van der Waals representations. (c) Molecular dynamics simulations show that cholesterol predominantly resides close to the C-alpha atom of Y433 but not C-alpha atom of R427, highlighting the significance of the aromatic Y in the TRKB CARC domain. (d) The binding of biotinylated BDNF (bBDNF) to TRKB is modulated by added cholesterol in a bell-shaped fashion [from Scatchard analysis Kd for bBDNF ctrl: 2.77 pM; chol 20 μM: 2.27pM; chol 50 μM: 2.61 pM; chol 100 μM: 1.93 pM; Bmax for bBDNF ctrl: 96.18; chol 20 μM: 108.9; chol 50 μM: 80.81; chol 100 μM: 65.35]. Curves from the Scatchard transformation of the TRKB:BDNF binding are depicted in the insert. Data expressed as mean/SEM of binding normalized by bBDNF10 ng/ml ctrl (no added cholesterol). (e) Expansion of the binding of bBDNF 1 ng/ml (black circles) and bBDNF 0 (ctrl, open circles), depicting the bell-shaped effect of different concentrations of cholesterol on bBDNF:TRKB interaction. Data expressed as mean/SEM of binding normalized by bBDNF 1 ng/ml ctrl. (f) Unlabeled BDNF (0-20 ng/ ml) dislocates bBDNF (1 ng/ml) binding to immobilized TRKB assayed at no supplemented cholesterol (0 μM). Data expressed as mean/SEM normalized by bBDNF 1 ng/ml at BDNF 0 ng/ml. *p < .05 from control (BDNF 1 ng/ml–cholesterol ctrl, R427)

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

Article Title: Cholesterol-recognition motifs in the transmembrane domain of the tyrosine kinase receptor family: The case of TRKB.

doi: 10.1111/ejn.15218

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 3 TRKB interaction with cholesterol. (a,b) Snapshots of the interaction between TRKB and cholesterol at the TMR (see supplement video) indicating that cholesterol (orange) interacts with the OH- group (red) in Y433 (cyan) of the TRKB.TMR (green). The TRKB.TMR helix is shown in the cartoon, the lipids and Y433 sidechain in van der Waals representations. (c) Molecular dynamics simulations show that cholesterol predominantly resides close to the C-alpha atom of Y433 but not C-alpha atom of R427, highlighting the significance of the aromatic Y in the TRKB CARC domain. (d) The binding of biotinylated BDNF (bBDNF) to TRKB is modulated by added cholesterol in a bell-shaped fashion [from Scatchard analysis Kd for bBDNF ctrl: 2.77 pM; chol 20 μM: 2.27pM; chol 50 μM: 2.61 pM; chol 100 μM: 1.93 pM; Bmax for bBDNF ctrl: 96.18; chol 20 μM: 108.9; chol 50 μM: 80.81; chol 100 μM: 65.35]. Curves from the Scatchard transformation of the TRKB:BDNF binding are depicted in the insert. Data expressed as mean/SEM of binding normalized by bBDNF10 ng/ml ctrl (no added cholesterol). (e) Expansion of the binding of bBDNF 1 ng/ml (black circles) and bBDNF 0 (ctrl, open circles), depicting the bell-shaped effect of different concentrations of cholesterol on bBDNF:TRKB interaction. Data expressed as mean/SEM of binding normalized by bBDNF 1 ng/ml ctrl. (f) Unlabeled BDNF (0-20 ng/ ml) dislocates bBDNF (1 ng/ml) binding to immobilized TRKB assayed at no supplemented cholesterol (0 μM). Data expressed as mean/SEM normalized by bBDNF 1 ng/ml at BDNF 0 ng/ml. *p < .05 from control (BDNF 1 ng/ml–cholesterol ctrl, R427)

Article Snippet: The plates were washed 3× with PBS buffer, and a mixture of biotinylated BDNF (bBDNF: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 ng/ml, Alomone Labs, #B- 250- B) and cholesterol (0, 20, 50 or 100 μM) was added for 1h at room temperature, followed by washing with PBS.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Transformation Assay, Control

Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the prefrontal (prelimbic/infralimbic) cortex of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. ***: p < 0.001 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).

Journal: Brain Sciences

Article Title: Neonatal Handling Positively Modulates Anxiety, Sensorimotor Gating, Working Memory, and Cortico-Hippocampal Neuroplastic Adaptations in Two Genetically Selected Rat Strains Differing in Emotional and Cognitive Traits

doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080776

Figure Lengend Snippet: Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the prefrontal (prelimbic/infralimbic) cortex of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. ***: p < 0.001 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).

Article Snippet: Molecular weight (mw) standards (Precision Plus Protein Western C Standards, Cat# 161–0376, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and recombinant human BDNF protein (rhBDNF) (Cat# B-257, Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel) were run in parallel.

Techniques: Western Blot

Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the anterior cingulate cortex of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. **: p < 0.01 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).

Journal: Brain Sciences

Article Title: Neonatal Handling Positively Modulates Anxiety, Sensorimotor Gating, Working Memory, and Cortico-Hippocampal Neuroplastic Adaptations in Two Genetically Selected Rat Strains Differing in Emotional and Cognitive Traits

doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080776

Figure Lengend Snippet: Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the anterior cingulate cortex of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. **: p < 0.01 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).

Article Snippet: Molecular weight (mw) standards (Precision Plus Protein Western C Standards, Cat# 161–0376, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and recombinant human BDNF protein (rhBDNF) (Cat# B-257, Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel) were run in parallel.

Techniques: Western Blot

Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the ventral hippocampus of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.02 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).

Journal: Brain Sciences

Article Title: Neonatal Handling Positively Modulates Anxiety, Sensorimotor Gating, Working Memory, and Cortico-Hippocampal Neuroplastic Adaptations in Two Genetically Selected Rat Strains Differing in Emotional and Cognitive Traits

doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080776

Figure Lengend Snippet: Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the ventral hippocampus of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.02 (post hoc Duncan’s multiple range test).

Article Snippet: Molecular weight (mw) standards (Precision Plus Protein Western C Standards, Cat# 161–0376, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and recombinant human BDNF protein (rhBDNF) (Cat# B-257, Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel) were run in parallel.

Techniques: Western Blot

Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the dorsal hippocampus of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group.

Journal: Brain Sciences

Article Title: Neonatal Handling Positively Modulates Anxiety, Sensorimotor Gating, Working Memory, and Cortico-Hippocampal Neuroplastic Adaptations in Two Genetically Selected Rat Strains Differing in Emotional and Cognitive Traits

doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080776

Figure Lengend Snippet: Western blot analysis of the BDNF ( A , B ), trkB ( C , D ), and the PSA-NCAM ( E , F ), in the dorsal hippocampus of the RHA and the RLA rats, either untreated controls (CTRL) or treated with neonatal handling (NH). The values represent the densitometric analysis of the BDNF/GAPDH ( B ), trkB/GAPDH ( D ), and the PSA-NCAM/GAPDH ( F ) band grey optical density (O.D.) ratios. The bars denote the mean ± S.E.M. of 9–10 rats, in each experimental group.

Article Snippet: Molecular weight (mw) standards (Precision Plus Protein Western C Standards, Cat# 161–0376, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and recombinant human BDNF protein (rhBDNF) (Cat# B-257, Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel) were run in parallel.

Techniques: Western Blot

Interactions between tubule-forming proteins and FIT2. (A) IP of FIT2-HA in WT and FIT2-HA KI HepG2 cells. WT and FIT2-HA KI cells were lysed in 1% digitonin-containing buffer. IP was performed with anti-HA antibodies. The samples were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (B) coIP of FIT2 and ER tubule-forming proteins in HepG2 cells. IP was performed as in A. Samples were analyzed by IB with antibodies of different ER membrane proteins. (C) FIT2-HA and REEP5-Myc were cotransfected into HEK293T cells and solubilized in triton-containing buffer or transfected individually into cells in different dishes, followed by mixing of the Triton-solubilized cell extracts. IP was performed with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibodies. (D) As in C, but with cells expressing FIT2-HA and/or GFP-Rtn4a. The asterisk (*) indicates degraded GFP-Rtn4a. (E) coIP of FIT2 truncations and Rtn4/REEP5. HEK293T cells expressing FIT2-HA, FIT2 truncations, or empty vector were lysed in 1% Triton-containing buffer and cell lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies.

Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology

Article Title: FIT2 organizes lipid droplet biogenesis with ER tubule-forming proteins and septins

doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907183

Figure Lengend Snippet: Interactions between tubule-forming proteins and FIT2. (A) IP of FIT2-HA in WT and FIT2-HA KI HepG2 cells. WT and FIT2-HA KI cells were lysed in 1% digitonin-containing buffer. IP was performed with anti-HA antibodies. The samples were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (B) coIP of FIT2 and ER tubule-forming proteins in HepG2 cells. IP was performed as in A. Samples were analyzed by IB with antibodies of different ER membrane proteins. (C) FIT2-HA and REEP5-Myc were cotransfected into HEK293T cells and solubilized in triton-containing buffer or transfected individually into cells in different dishes, followed by mixing of the Triton-solubilized cell extracts. IP was performed with anti-HA or anti-Myc antibodies. (D) As in C, but with cells expressing FIT2-HA and/or GFP-Rtn4a. The asterisk (*) indicates degraded GFP-Rtn4a. (E) coIP of FIT2 truncations and Rtn4/REEP5. HEK293T cells expressing FIT2-HA, FIT2 truncations, or empty vector were lysed in 1% Triton-containing buffer and cell lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are mouse–anti-GAPDH (Proteintech; 60004–1), rabbit–anti-NOGO (Rtn4; Novus; NB100-5681), rabbit–anti-REEP5 (Proteintech; 14643–1-AP), rabbit–anti-calnexin (Proteintech; 10427–2-AP), rabbit–anti-GFP (Proteintech; 50430–2-AP), rabbit–anti–septin 7 (Abcam; ab175229), rabbit–anti–septin 6 (Immunoway; YT4205), rabbit–anti-MSF (septin 9; Abcam; ab114099), mouse–anti-His (MBL; D291-3), mouse–anti–β-actin (abgent; AM1021B), rabbit–anti-BIP (Abcam; ab21685), mouse–anti-PDI (Abcam; ab2792), mouse–anti-ACSL3 (Abnova; H00002181-B01P), mouse–anti-BSCL2 (seipin; Abnova; H00026580-A02), and rabbit–anti-sec61β (Abcam; ab78276).

Techniques: Western Blot, Transfection, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Immunoprecipitation

Purification of septins and FIT2. (A) Representation of the septin2/6/7 hexamer. (B) Purified septin2/6/7 hexamer was detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. The strep tag on the C-terminus of septin 7 was cleaved by thrombin. (C) The purified FIT2-strep-His8-GFP fusion protein was detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (D) Representation of FIT2 proteoliposomes. (E) Purified His-tagged septins 2, 6, 7, and 9 were detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (F) Purified His-tagged septin 7 CC and septin 7ΔCC were detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (G–I) As in but with COS-7 cells depleted of Sec61β. n = 51–88 cells/group. Mann–Whitney test; NS, P > 0.05. Scale bar, 10 µm. Error bars represent SEM. (J) As in , Sec61β and GAPDH were detected by immunoblotting (IB). (K) coIP of FIT2 and Rtn4/REEP5 before and after OA treatment. WT and FIT2-HA KI HepG2 cells were delipidated by starving for 60 h or treating with OA for 15 min and lysed in 1% digitonin buffer. IP was performed with anti-HA antibodies, and samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. The relative amount of Rtn4 (coIP) or REEP5 (coIP) compared with FIT2-HA (IP) was quantified by Gel-Pro analyzer software. siSec61β, small interfering Sec61β.

Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology

Article Title: FIT2 organizes lipid droplet biogenesis with ER tubule-forming proteins and septins

doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907183

Figure Lengend Snippet: Purification of septins and FIT2. (A) Representation of the septin2/6/7 hexamer. (B) Purified septin2/6/7 hexamer was detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. The strep tag on the C-terminus of septin 7 was cleaved by thrombin. (C) The purified FIT2-strep-His8-GFP fusion protein was detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (D) Representation of FIT2 proteoliposomes. (E) Purified His-tagged septins 2, 6, 7, and 9 were detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (F) Purified His-tagged septin 7 CC and septin 7ΔCC were detected by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (G–I) As in but with COS-7 cells depleted of Sec61β. n = 51–88 cells/group. Mann–Whitney test; NS, P > 0.05. Scale bar, 10 µm. Error bars represent SEM. (J) As in , Sec61β and GAPDH were detected by immunoblotting (IB). (K) coIP of FIT2 and Rtn4/REEP5 before and after OA treatment. WT and FIT2-HA KI HepG2 cells were delipidated by starving for 60 h or treating with OA for 15 min and lysed in 1% digitonin buffer. IP was performed with anti-HA antibodies, and samples were analyzed by immunoblotting. The relative amount of Rtn4 (coIP) or REEP5 (coIP) compared with FIT2-HA (IP) was quantified by Gel-Pro analyzer software. siSec61β, small interfering Sec61β.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are mouse–anti-GAPDH (Proteintech; 60004–1), rabbit–anti-NOGO (Rtn4; Novus; NB100-5681), rabbit–anti-REEP5 (Proteintech; 14643–1-AP), rabbit–anti-calnexin (Proteintech; 10427–2-AP), rabbit–anti-GFP (Proteintech; 50430–2-AP), rabbit–anti–septin 7 (Abcam; ab175229), rabbit–anti–septin 6 (Immunoway; YT4205), rabbit–anti-MSF (septin 9; Abcam; ab114099), mouse–anti-His (MBL; D291-3), mouse–anti–β-actin (abgent; AM1021B), rabbit–anti-BIP (Abcam; ab21685), mouse–anti-PDI (Abcam; ab2792), mouse–anti-ACSL3 (Abnova; H00002181-B01P), mouse–anti-BSCL2 (seipin; Abnova; H00026580-A02), and rabbit–anti-sec61β (Abcam; ab78276).

Techniques: Purification, SDS Page, Staining, Strep-tag, MANN-WHITNEY, Western Blot, Software

Tubule-forming proteins are required in the maintenance of LD homeostasis in HepG2 cells. (A) The levels of FIT2 and FIT2-related tubule-forming proteins were determined by Western blotting or real-time PCR as indicated after HepG2 cells were transfected with siRNAs for 48 h. (B) Western blotting of Rtn4 in WT and Rtn4-KO HepG2 cells. (C) LipidTOX staining of LDs and quantification of number of LDs per cell, as well as LD size, in WT and Rtn4 KO HepG2 cells without (−OA) or with (+OA) OA treatment. Colorized pictures were acquired using Imaris software. Different colors indicate different LD diameters, as labeled. n = 50–76 cells/group, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (D) The level of Climp-63 was determined by Western blotting after HepG2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 48 h. (E) As in C, except in Control and Climp-63–depleted HepG2 cells. For groups without OA treatment, n = 76 and 74 cells, total LD numbers >2,000. For groups with OA treatment, n = 45 and 51 cells, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; NS, P > 0.05. Scale bar, 10 µm. (F) Levels of LD-related proteins in HepG2 cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. (G) Septin 2 KO (SEPT2 KO) HepG2 cells were generated using CRISPR/Cas9, two single clones (#10 and #16) picked, and the protein level of septin 2 in WT and SEPT2 KO cells measured by immunoblotting (IB). (H–J) The knockdown efficiencies of siRNAs targeting septin 6, 7, and 9 were tested by Western blotting. (K) As in , LipidTOX staining and Imaris 3D images of OA-treated HepG2 cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. The numbers and sizes of the LDs in each group were determined by Imaris surface analysis. n = 50–76 cells/group, n = 74–101 cells/group, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. siClimp-63, small interfering Climp-63; siControl, small interfering Control; si FIT2, small interfering siFIT2; siREEP5, small interfering REEP5; siRtn4, small interfering Rtn4; siSEPT, small interfering SEPT. Error bars represent SEM.

Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology

Article Title: FIT2 organizes lipid droplet biogenesis with ER tubule-forming proteins and septins

doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907183

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tubule-forming proteins are required in the maintenance of LD homeostasis in HepG2 cells. (A) The levels of FIT2 and FIT2-related tubule-forming proteins were determined by Western blotting or real-time PCR as indicated after HepG2 cells were transfected with siRNAs for 48 h. (B) Western blotting of Rtn4 in WT and Rtn4-KO HepG2 cells. (C) LipidTOX staining of LDs and quantification of number of LDs per cell, as well as LD size, in WT and Rtn4 KO HepG2 cells without (−OA) or with (+OA) OA treatment. Colorized pictures were acquired using Imaris software. Different colors indicate different LD diameters, as labeled. n = 50–76 cells/group, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (D) The level of Climp-63 was determined by Western blotting after HepG2 cells were transfected with the indicated siRNAs for 48 h. (E) As in C, except in Control and Climp-63–depleted HepG2 cells. For groups without OA treatment, n = 76 and 74 cells, total LD numbers >2,000. For groups with OA treatment, n = 45 and 51 cells, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; NS, P > 0.05. Scale bar, 10 µm. (F) Levels of LD-related proteins in HepG2 cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. (G) Septin 2 KO (SEPT2 KO) HepG2 cells were generated using CRISPR/Cas9, two single clones (#10 and #16) picked, and the protein level of septin 2 in WT and SEPT2 KO cells measured by immunoblotting (IB). (H–J) The knockdown efficiencies of siRNAs targeting septin 6, 7, and 9 were tested by Western blotting. (K) As in , LipidTOX staining and Imaris 3D images of OA-treated HepG2 cells transfected with the indicated siRNAs. The numbers and sizes of the LDs in each group were determined by Imaris surface analysis. n = 50–76 cells/group, n = 74–101 cells/group, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. siClimp-63, small interfering Climp-63; siControl, small interfering Control; si FIT2, small interfering siFIT2; siREEP5, small interfering REEP5; siRtn4, small interfering Rtn4; siSEPT, small interfering SEPT. Error bars represent SEM.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are mouse–anti-GAPDH (Proteintech; 60004–1), rabbit–anti-NOGO (Rtn4; Novus; NB100-5681), rabbit–anti-REEP5 (Proteintech; 14643–1-AP), rabbit–anti-calnexin (Proteintech; 10427–2-AP), rabbit–anti-GFP (Proteintech; 50430–2-AP), rabbit–anti–septin 7 (Abcam; ab175229), rabbit–anti–septin 6 (Immunoway; YT4205), rabbit–anti-MSF (septin 9; Abcam; ab114099), mouse–anti-His (MBL; D291-3), mouse–anti–β-actin (abgent; AM1021B), rabbit–anti-BIP (Abcam; ab21685), mouse–anti-PDI (Abcam; ab2792), mouse–anti-ACSL3 (Abnova; H00002181-B01P), mouse–anti-BSCL2 (seipin; Abnova; H00026580-A02), and rabbit–anti-sec61β (Abcam; ab78276).

Techniques: Western Blot, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Staining, Software, Labeling, MANN-WHITNEY, Generated, CRISPR, Clone Assay

FIT2-interacting proteins in LD biogenesis. (A) LipidTOX staining of LDs and quantification of LDs per cell, as well as LD size, in control and tubule-forming protein-depleted HepG2 cells without OA treatment. 3D pictures of LDs were acquired under a confocal microscope by serial layer scanning along the z axis. Colorized pictures were acquired using Imaris software. Different colors indicate different LD diameters, as labeled. n = 86–200 cells/group. All graphs are representative of three repetitions, total LDs numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) As in A, except each group of cells was treated with 0.2 mM OA for 6 h before LipidTOX staining. n = 82–143 cells/group, total LDs numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (C and D ) As in A and B, LDs were stained in WT (SEPT2-WT) and septin 2 KO (SEPT2-KO) HepG2 cells with (C) or without (D) OA treatment. The numbers and sizes (diameter) of LDs were measured. For groups without OA treatment, n = 46–76 cells/group; for groups with OA treatment, n = 53–78 cells/group, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. siControl, small interfering Control; siFIT2, small interfering FIT2; siREEP5, small interfering siREEP5; siRtn4, small interfering Rtn4. Error bars represent SEM.

Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology

Article Title: FIT2 organizes lipid droplet biogenesis with ER tubule-forming proteins and septins

doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907183

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIT2-interacting proteins in LD biogenesis. (A) LipidTOX staining of LDs and quantification of LDs per cell, as well as LD size, in control and tubule-forming protein-depleted HepG2 cells without OA treatment. 3D pictures of LDs were acquired under a confocal microscope by serial layer scanning along the z axis. Colorized pictures were acquired using Imaris software. Different colors indicate different LD diameters, as labeled. n = 86–200 cells/group. All graphs are representative of three repetitions, total LDs numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) As in A, except each group of cells was treated with 0.2 mM OA for 6 h before LipidTOX staining. n = 82–143 cells/group, total LDs numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (C and D ) As in A and B, LDs were stained in WT (SEPT2-WT) and septin 2 KO (SEPT2-KO) HepG2 cells with (C) or without (D) OA treatment. The numbers and sizes (diameter) of LDs were measured. For groups without OA treatment, n = 46–76 cells/group; for groups with OA treatment, n = 53–78 cells/group, total LD numbers >2,000. Mann–Whitney test; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. siControl, small interfering Control; siFIT2, small interfering FIT2; siREEP5, small interfering siREEP5; siRtn4, small interfering Rtn4. Error bars represent SEM.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are mouse–anti-GAPDH (Proteintech; 60004–1), rabbit–anti-NOGO (Rtn4; Novus; NB100-5681), rabbit–anti-REEP5 (Proteintech; 14643–1-AP), rabbit–anti-calnexin (Proteintech; 10427–2-AP), rabbit–anti-GFP (Proteintech; 50430–2-AP), rabbit–anti–septin 7 (Abcam; ab175229), rabbit–anti–septin 6 (Immunoway; YT4205), rabbit–anti-MSF (septin 9; Abcam; ab114099), mouse–anti-His (MBL; D291-3), mouse–anti–β-actin (abgent; AM1021B), rabbit–anti-BIP (Abcam; ab21685), mouse–anti-PDI (Abcam; ab2792), mouse–anti-ACSL3 (Abnova; H00002181-B01P), mouse–anti-BSCL2 (seipin; Abnova; H00026580-A02), and rabbit–anti-sec61β (Abcam; ab78276).

Techniques: Staining, Microscopy, Software, Labeling, MANN-WHITNEY

Functional tests of FIT2-interacting proteins. (A) Representative confocal images of wild-type and yop-1(ok3629) larval stage L4 animals carrying the ldrIs2 (Pmdt28::mdt28::cherry) transgene. Images are 3D projections of 2.62-µm confocal z -stacks that covered the posterior body forward from the vent. LD quantification is shown on the right. n = 16 ( wild-type ) and 18 ( yop-1 ) animals. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) As in A, but with RET-1–depleted animals generated by RNAi feeding. n = 7 ( wild-type ) and 11 ( ret-1 ) animals. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (C) As in A, but with unc-61(e228) mutant. n = 10 ( wild-type ) and 13 ( unc-61 ) animals. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. Error bars represent SEM. (D) Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were collected at the indicated times, and protein levels were detected by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (E) The knockdown efficiency of the indicated siRNAs in 3T3-L1 cells was measured by IB. (F) Representative images of 3T3-L1 adipocytes. On day 10, differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were fixed and stained with Oil Red. Images were captured using a stereomicroscope under the indicated magnifications. Scale bar, 2 mm. siControl, small interfering Control; simSEPT2: small interfering mouse SEPT2; simREEP5: small interfering mouse REEP5; simRtn4, small interfering mouse Rtn4.

Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology

Article Title: FIT2 organizes lipid droplet biogenesis with ER tubule-forming proteins and septins

doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907183

Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional tests of FIT2-interacting proteins. (A) Representative confocal images of wild-type and yop-1(ok3629) larval stage L4 animals carrying the ldrIs2 (Pmdt28::mdt28::cherry) transgene. Images are 3D projections of 2.62-µm confocal z -stacks that covered the posterior body forward from the vent. LD quantification is shown on the right. n = 16 ( wild-type ) and 18 ( yop-1 ) animals. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) As in A, but with RET-1–depleted animals generated by RNAi feeding. n = 7 ( wild-type ) and 11 ( ret-1 ) animals. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (C) As in A, but with unc-61(e228) mutant. n = 10 ( wild-type ) and 13 ( unc-61 ) animals. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. Error bars represent SEM. (D) Differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were collected at the indicated times, and protein levels were detected by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (E) The knockdown efficiency of the indicated siRNAs in 3T3-L1 cells was measured by IB. (F) Representative images of 3T3-L1 adipocytes. On day 10, differentiated 3T3-L1 cells were fixed and stained with Oil Red. Images were captured using a stereomicroscope under the indicated magnifications. Scale bar, 2 mm. siControl, small interfering Control; simSEPT2: small interfering mouse SEPT2; simREEP5: small interfering mouse REEP5; simRtn4, small interfering mouse Rtn4.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are mouse–anti-GAPDH (Proteintech; 60004–1), rabbit–anti-NOGO (Rtn4; Novus; NB100-5681), rabbit–anti-REEP5 (Proteintech; 14643–1-AP), rabbit–anti-calnexin (Proteintech; 10427–2-AP), rabbit–anti-GFP (Proteintech; 50430–2-AP), rabbit–anti–septin 7 (Abcam; ab175229), rabbit–anti–septin 6 (Immunoway; YT4205), rabbit–anti-MSF (septin 9; Abcam; ab114099), mouse–anti-His (MBL; D291-3), mouse–anti–β-actin (abgent; AM1021B), rabbit–anti-BIP (Abcam; ab21685), mouse–anti-PDI (Abcam; ab2792), mouse–anti-ACSL3 (Abnova; H00002181-B01P), mouse–anti-BSCL2 (seipin; Abnova; H00026580-A02), and rabbit–anti-sec61β (Abcam; ab78276).

Techniques: Functional Assay, Generated, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Staining

FIT2-interacting proteins in early steps of LD formation. (A) Representative images of remaining LDs after delipidation and nascent LDs formed after OA treatment in control and ER tubule-forming protein–depleted COS-7 cells. Each group of cells expressing LiveDrop was delipidated for 60 h and then treated with 0.2 mM OA for 15 min to induce nascent LD formation. Quantification of LDs is shown on the right. n = 36–42 cells/group. Unpaired t test; NS, P > 0.05. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) As in A, but with cells overexpressing Flag–Climp-63. n = 33–37 cells/group. One-way ANOVA, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (C) As in A, but nascent LDs in septin 2 knockdown COS-7 cells were counted. The bottom images show enlargements of the boxed regions over the tubular ER network. n = 13–16 cells/group. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm; 3 µm (inset). Error bars represent SEM. (D) Time-lapse stills of nascent LD formation in control or septin 2 knockdown COS-7 cells. The histogram on the right shows the quantification of the frequency of nascent LDs in the indicated time frame. n = 3 or 4 cells/group. Scale bar, 5 µm. siControl, small interfering Control; siFIT2, small interfering FIT2; siREEP5, small interfering siREEP5; siRtn4, small interfering Rtn4; siSEPT, small interfering SEPT.

Journal: The Journal of Cell Biology

Article Title: FIT2 organizes lipid droplet biogenesis with ER tubule-forming proteins and septins

doi: 10.1083/jcb.201907183

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIT2-interacting proteins in early steps of LD formation. (A) Representative images of remaining LDs after delipidation and nascent LDs formed after OA treatment in control and ER tubule-forming protein–depleted COS-7 cells. Each group of cells expressing LiveDrop was delipidated for 60 h and then treated with 0.2 mM OA for 15 min to induce nascent LD formation. Quantification of LDs is shown on the right. n = 36–42 cells/group. Unpaired t test; NS, P > 0.05. Scale bar, 10 µm. (B) As in A, but with cells overexpressing Flag–Climp-63. n = 33–37 cells/group. One-way ANOVA, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm. (C) As in A, but nascent LDs in septin 2 knockdown COS-7 cells were counted. The bottom images show enlargements of the boxed regions over the tubular ER network. n = 13–16 cells/group. Unpaired t test, ***, P < 0.001. Scale bar, 10 µm; 3 µm (inset). Error bars represent SEM. (D) Time-lapse stills of nascent LD formation in control or septin 2 knockdown COS-7 cells. The histogram on the right shows the quantification of the frequency of nascent LDs in the indicated time frame. n = 3 or 4 cells/group. Scale bar, 5 µm. siControl, small interfering Control; siFIT2, small interfering FIT2; siREEP5, small interfering siREEP5; siRtn4, small interfering Rtn4; siSEPT, small interfering SEPT.

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used for immunoblotting are mouse–anti-GAPDH (Proteintech; 60004–1), rabbit–anti-NOGO (Rtn4; Novus; NB100-5681), rabbit–anti-REEP5 (Proteintech; 14643–1-AP), rabbit–anti-calnexin (Proteintech; 10427–2-AP), rabbit–anti-GFP (Proteintech; 50430–2-AP), rabbit–anti–septin 7 (Abcam; ab175229), rabbit–anti–septin 6 (Immunoway; YT4205), rabbit–anti-MSF (septin 9; Abcam; ab114099), mouse–anti-His (MBL; D291-3), mouse–anti–β-actin (abgent; AM1021B), rabbit–anti-BIP (Abcam; ab21685), mouse–anti-PDI (Abcam; ab2792), mouse–anti-ACSL3 (Abnova; H00002181-B01P), mouse–anti-BSCL2 (seipin; Abnova; H00026580-A02), and rabbit–anti-sec61β (Abcam; ab78276).

Techniques: Expressing

BMM (treated with siRNA to either CLIMP-63 or RTN4 or treated with control siRNA, Ctr) were infected with L. donovani or L. amazonensis metacyclic promastigotes and at various time points post-phagocytosis parasite replication and PV size were assessed. (A) Quantification of L. donovani parasite burden in CLIMP-63 depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (B) Quantification of L. amazonensis parasite burden in CLIMP-63 depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (C) Quantification of PV size in CLIMP-63-depleted BMM infected with L. amazonensis at 48 and 72 h post-phagocytosis. (D) Quantification of L. donovani parasite burden in RTN4-depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (E) Quantification of L. amazonensis parasite burden in RTN4-depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (F) Quantification of PV size in RTN4-depleted BMM infected with L. amazonensis at 48 and 72 h post-phagocytosis. Data in (A, B, D, E) are presented as the means ± SEM of values of one representative experiment of three independent experiments. Data in (C, F) are presented as a violin plot with means ± standard deviations (SD) of values from three independent experiments for a total of 450 PVs. Statistics were calculated using one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s multiple comparison test with * P ≤ 0.05, *** P ≤ 0.001 and **** P ≤ 0.0001 significance. Blots showing the efficacy the siRNA-mediated CLIMP-63 and RTN4 knockdowns are shown in S3 Fig and S4 Fig, respectively.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Leishmania exploits the macrophage endoplasmic reticulum-shaping protein CLIMP-63 to modulate mitochondrial biogenesis and bioenergetics

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.19.712868

Figure Lengend Snippet: BMM (treated with siRNA to either CLIMP-63 or RTN4 or treated with control siRNA, Ctr) were infected with L. donovani or L. amazonensis metacyclic promastigotes and at various time points post-phagocytosis parasite replication and PV size were assessed. (A) Quantification of L. donovani parasite burden in CLIMP-63 depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (B) Quantification of L. amazonensis parasite burden in CLIMP-63 depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (C) Quantification of PV size in CLIMP-63-depleted BMM infected with L. amazonensis at 48 and 72 h post-phagocytosis. (D) Quantification of L. donovani parasite burden in RTN4-depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (E) Quantification of L. amazonensis parasite burden in RTN4-depleted BMM at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. (F) Quantification of PV size in RTN4-depleted BMM infected with L. amazonensis at 48 and 72 h post-phagocytosis. Data in (A, B, D, E) are presented as the means ± SEM of values of one representative experiment of three independent experiments. Data in (C, F) are presented as a violin plot with means ± standard deviations (SD) of values from three independent experiments for a total of 450 PVs. Statistics were calculated using one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak’s multiple comparison test with * P ≤ 0.05, *** P ≤ 0.001 and **** P ≤ 0.0001 significance. Blots showing the efficacy the siRNA-mediated CLIMP-63 and RTN4 knockdowns are shown in S3 Fig and S4 Fig, respectively.

Article Snippet: The mouse anti-CLIMP-63 monoclonal antibody (sc-393544) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, the rabbit anti-RTN4 polyclonal antibody (ab186735) and the rat anti-BrdU (ab6326) were from Abcam, the rabbit polyclonal antibody RTN4 (10950-1-AP) was from Proteintech, the mouse anti-phosphoglycan (Galβ1,4Manα1-PO4) CA7AE monoclonal antibody ( ) was from Cedarlane, the rabbit anti-β-actin polyclonal antibody was from Cell Signalling, the rabbit anti-Tom20 polyclonal antibody (EPR15581-54) was from Abcam, and the rat anti-LAMP-1 monoclonal antibody 1D4B developed by J.T.

Techniques: Control, Infection, Comparison

Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) A201 against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001

Journal: Cell Death and Differentiation

Article Title: Amino-Nogo-A antagonizes reactive oxygen species generation and protects immature primary cortical neurons from oxidative toxicity

doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.206

Figure Lengend Snippet: Nogo-A expression in cortical neurons. (a) The diagram for antibodies against different antigen recognition sites of human Nogo-A NiR-Δ2 (amino acids (aa) 57–185), NiG-Δ20 (aa 564–749) and Nogo-66 (aa 1055–1120) are the three inhibitory regions of human Nogo-A. TMs are transmembrane domains located on the two sides of Nogo-66. The arrows indicate the target regions of five Nogo-A-specific antibodies, polyclonal antibody (pAb) A201 against aa 201–250, monoclonal antibody (mAb) A563 against aa 563–627, mAb 1E8 against aa 570–691 and pAb A620 against aa 620–1004. 2B3 is targeted to Nogo-66, aa 1055–1120. (b) Top: the expression of neuronal Nogo-A was immunostained with A620 and TuJ1, an immature neuronal marker. Lower: subcellular distribution of neuronal Nogo-A was blotted with A620. Cytosolic (F1), organelle/membrane (F2), nucleic (F3) and cytoskeleton fractions (F4) were the four subcellular fractions of neurons. (c) Living cell staining for neurons were performed with pAb A620, mAb 1E8 or pAb A201 (top). The A620 and 1E8 antibodies had previously been shown to label the extracellular amino-Nogo-A in oligodendrocytes (lower). (d) The total RNA was extracted from neurons exposed to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 8 h or not and submitted to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). β-Actin was selected as an inner standard. (e) Cell lysates from neurons exposed to 50 μM H2O2 for 8 h or not were blotted with pAb A620. β-Actin was selected as an inner standard (left). Quantification by densitometric scans was presented by Nogo-A/β-actin (right). Bar=50 μm. n=3, mean±S.D., paired t-test, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001

Article Snippet: 7 , 15 For western blots, A620 and two commercial antibodies, A201 (Prosci, San Diego, CA, USA; no. 4089) and A563 (BD Biosciences PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA; no. 612238) were used.

Techniques: Expressing, Marker, Membrane, Staining, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

In all, 290–562 residues are the pivotal domain of amino-Nogo-A for resisting to oxidative damage. (a) Schematic diagram of different deletions (M1–M9) of amino-Nogo. (b) Neurons were pretreated with 0.2 μM HIV-1 trans-activating (TAT)-M1-M9 for 2 h, followed by exposure to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for another 12 h in the presence of TAT-M1-M9. Cell death rate was calculated by propidium iodide (PI) (+)/Hoechst (+). (c) Lysates from neurons treated by H2O2 with or without TAT-AM was performed to western blot with anti-HA and A201 antibodies. β-Actin was selected as a loading control. *Presented the nonspecific bands of anti-HA antibody. (d) HEK293FT transfected with mock or full-length human Nogo-A were treated with indicated concentrations of H2O2 for 1 h, and cell lysates were subjected to western blot probed with A201 antibody. β-Actin was selected as a loading control. The 48 kDa bands were pointed with arrow; n=4, mean±S.D., one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), *P<0.05; ***P<0.001

Journal: Cell Death and Differentiation

Article Title: Amino-Nogo-A antagonizes reactive oxygen species generation and protects immature primary cortical neurons from oxidative toxicity

doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.206

Figure Lengend Snippet: In all, 290–562 residues are the pivotal domain of amino-Nogo-A for resisting to oxidative damage. (a) Schematic diagram of different deletions (M1–M9) of amino-Nogo. (b) Neurons were pretreated with 0.2 μM HIV-1 trans-activating (TAT)-M1-M9 for 2 h, followed by exposure to 50 μM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for another 12 h in the presence of TAT-M1-M9. Cell death rate was calculated by propidium iodide (PI) (+)/Hoechst (+). (c) Lysates from neurons treated by H2O2 with or without TAT-AM was performed to western blot with anti-HA and A201 antibodies. β-Actin was selected as a loading control. *Presented the nonspecific bands of anti-HA antibody. (d) HEK293FT transfected with mock or full-length human Nogo-A were treated with indicated concentrations of H2O2 for 1 h, and cell lysates were subjected to western blot probed with A201 antibody. β-Actin was selected as a loading control. The 48 kDa bands were pointed with arrow; n=4, mean±S.D., one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), *P<0.05; ***P<0.001

Article Snippet: 7 , 15 For western blots, A620 and two commercial antibodies, A201 (Prosci, San Diego, CA, USA; no. 4089) and A563 (BD Biosciences PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA; no. 612238) were used.

Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Transfection