aspc1 Search Results


aspc 1  (ATCC)
99
ATCC aspc 1
Effects of Cal on aPSC activation. (A) (Left) VDR mRNA expression in PDAC cell lines <t>(AsPC‐1,</t> MIA PaCa‐2, and PANC‐1) and aPSCs was determined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (Right) CYP24A1 mRNA expression in PDAC or aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) was examined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (B) VDR protein expression in PDAC cell lines (AsPC‐1, MIA PaCa‐2, and PANC‐1) and aPSCs was determined by western blot ( n = 3). (C) Correlation analysis between α‐SMA and VDR mRNA expression in aPSCs, with GAPDH normalization ( n = 9). (D) VDR and α‐SMA gene expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) was evaluated by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (E) VDR and α‐SMA protein expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) ( n = 4). (F) Immunocytochemistry showing α‐SMA expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 hr) ( n = 3). (G) EZ4U assay indicating the impacts of Cal on the proliferation of aPSCs ( n = 3). (H) Transwell migration assay and (I) wound healing showing the effects of Cal on aPSCs’ migration ability ( n = 3). caPSCs, PSCs derived from pancreatic cancer; cpPSCs, PSCs derived from chronic pancreatitis; cuPSCs, culture‐activated PSCs derived from normal tissue; aPSCs, activated PSCs; HPF, high‐power field; Ctr, control group treated with DMSO. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. ns, not significant. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Aspc 1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pmc13109869-50-22-24?v=ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH aspc
A) In vitro tumor spheroid (TS) assay to assess the treatment response to electroporation and CAR T-cell therapy. (1) TSs were formed within a low-adherent U-bottom 96-well, (2) then moved to a 4-well rectangular plate with low- conductivity buffer to (3) deliver electroporation via parallel plate electrodes. (4) The TSs were immediately moved back into the original U-bottom well, where (5) adjuvant CAR T-cells therapy or sham was delivered. B) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging <t>of</t> <t>AsPC-1</t> TSs at 3 hours and 72 hours after treatment for different electric field magnitudes; scale bar is 1 mm. Normalized absorbance for the XTT assay at C) 3 hours and D) 72 hours post-treatment at different electric fields; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test and correction; mean ± SD; n=3. E) Green fluorescent intensity of FLuc-eGFP + AsPC-1 TSs over time across different electric fields. F) Normalized GFP intensity and G) TS area over time; One-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc between groups on the last timepoints (*p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001); Multiple One-Sample Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests between that timepoint and zero (# p < 0.05); n = 3.
Aspc, supplied by CLS Cell Lines Service GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/bio_rxiv__2025__08__10__669537-182-7-5?v=CLS+Cell+Lines+Service+GmbH
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC human pancreatic cancer cell lines
A) In vitro tumor spheroid (TS) assay to assess the treatment response to electroporation and CAR T-cell therapy. (1) TSs were formed within a low-adherent U-bottom 96-well, (2) then moved to a 4-well rectangular plate with low- conductivity buffer to (3) deliver electroporation via parallel plate electrodes. (4) The TSs were immediately moved back into the original U-bottom well, where (5) adjuvant CAR T-cells therapy or sham was delivered. B) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging <t>of</t> <t>AsPC-1</t> TSs at 3 hours and 72 hours after treatment for different electric field magnitudes; scale bar is 1 mm. Normalized absorbance for the XTT assay at C) 3 hours and D) 72 hours post-treatment at different electric fields; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test and correction; mean ± SD; n=3. E) Green fluorescent intensity of FLuc-eGFP + AsPC-1 TSs over time across different electric fields. F) Normalized GFP intensity and G) TS area over time; One-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc between groups on the last timepoints (*p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001); Multiple One-Sample Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests between that timepoint and zero (# p < 0.05); n = 3.
Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pmc12415682-27-0-32?v=ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pancreatic cancer cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
GenTarget human aspc1 luciferase stable cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Human Aspc1 Luciferase Stable Cells, supplied by GenTarget, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pmc10340829-50-0-7?v=GenTarget
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human aspc1 luciferase stable cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BioResource International Inc aspc-1
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1, supplied by BioResource International Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pm35364561-73-17-26?v=BioResource+International+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
DS Pharma Biomedical human pancreatic cancer cell lines aspc-1
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines Aspc 1, supplied by DS Pharma Biomedical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pm18037960-186-7-22?v=DS+Pharma+Biomedical
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human pancreatic cancer cell lines aspc-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures aspc-1 human pancreatic carcinoma cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1 Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells, supplied by European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pm32514725-54-2-12?v=European+Collection+of+Authenticated+Cell+Cultures
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 human pancreatic carcinoma cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ProQinase GmbH aspc‑1‑luc cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc‑1‑Luc Cells, supplied by ProQinase GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pmc05423209-105-19-31?v=ProQinase+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc‑1‑luc cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
JCRB Cell Bank aspc-1 cells stably transfected with a luciferase reporter construct
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1 Cells Stably Transfected With A Luciferase Reporter Construct, supplied by JCRB Cell Bank, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pmc08881656-279-6-14?v=JCRB+Cell+Bank
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 cells stably transfected with a luciferase reporter construct - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Shanghai GenePharma aspc-1-gem
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1 Gem, supplied by Shanghai GenePharma, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pmc06678460-40-26-30?v=Shanghai+GenePharma
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1-gem - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Changyi Aoxin Chemical Co Ltd human coronary artery endothelial cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells, supplied by Changyi Aoxin Chemical Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/10__1161_slash_atvbaha__108__163667-13-8-13?v=Changyi+Aoxin+Chemical+Co+Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human coronary artery endothelial cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
iCell Bioscience Inc aspc-1 cells
Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 <t>AsPC1,</t> and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).
Aspc 1 Cells, supplied by iCell Bioscience Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/aspc1/pm39741300-74-3-8?v=iCell+Bioscience+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aspc-1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Effects of Cal on aPSC activation. (A) (Left) VDR mRNA expression in PDAC cell lines (AsPC‐1, MIA PaCa‐2, and PANC‐1) and aPSCs was determined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (Right) CYP24A1 mRNA expression in PDAC or aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) was examined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (B) VDR protein expression in PDAC cell lines (AsPC‐1, MIA PaCa‐2, and PANC‐1) and aPSCs was determined by western blot ( n = 3). (C) Correlation analysis between α‐SMA and VDR mRNA expression in aPSCs, with GAPDH normalization ( n = 9). (D) VDR and α‐SMA gene expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) was evaluated by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (E) VDR and α‐SMA protein expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) ( n = 4). (F) Immunocytochemistry showing α‐SMA expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 hr) ( n = 3). (G) EZ4U assay indicating the impacts of Cal on the proliferation of aPSCs ( n = 3). (H) Transwell migration assay and (I) wound healing showing the effects of Cal on aPSCs’ migration ability ( n = 3). caPSCs, PSCs derived from pancreatic cancer; cpPSCs, PSCs derived from chronic pancreatitis; cuPSCs, culture‐activated PSCs derived from normal tissue; aPSCs, activated PSCs; HPF, high‐power field; Ctr, control group treated with DMSO. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. ns, not significant. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Journal: Mediators of Inflammation

Article Title: The Vitamin D3 Analog Calcipotriol Attenuates Pancreatic Cancer Malignancy via Downregulating Thrombospondin 1 in Pancreatic Stellate Cells

doi: 10.1155/mi/2632235

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of Cal on aPSC activation. (A) (Left) VDR mRNA expression in PDAC cell lines (AsPC‐1, MIA PaCa‐2, and PANC‐1) and aPSCs was determined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (Right) CYP24A1 mRNA expression in PDAC or aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) was examined by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (B) VDR protein expression in PDAC cell lines (AsPC‐1, MIA PaCa‐2, and PANC‐1) and aPSCs was determined by western blot ( n = 3). (C) Correlation analysis between α‐SMA and VDR mRNA expression in aPSCs, with GAPDH normalization ( n = 9). (D) VDR and α‐SMA gene expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) was evaluated by qRT‐PCR ( n = 3). (E) VDR and α‐SMA protein expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 h) ( n = 4). (F) Immunocytochemistry showing α‐SMA expression in aPSCs treated with DMSO or Cal (100 nM and 48 hr) ( n = 3). (G) EZ4U assay indicating the impacts of Cal on the proliferation of aPSCs ( n = 3). (H) Transwell migration assay and (I) wound healing showing the effects of Cal on aPSCs’ migration ability ( n = 3). caPSCs, PSCs derived from pancreatic cancer; cpPSCs, PSCs derived from chronic pancreatitis; cuPSCs, culture‐activated PSCs derived from normal tissue; aPSCs, activated PSCs; HPF, high‐power field; Ctr, control group treated with DMSO. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. ns, not significant. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.

Article Snippet: Human PDAC cell lines PANC‐1 (male, American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] CRL‐1469, RRID: CVCL_0480), MIA PaCa‐2 (male, ATCC CRL‐1420, RRID: CVCL_0428), and AsPC‐1 (female, ATCC CRL‐1682, RRID: CVCL_0152) were purchased directly from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) in 2015.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot, Gene Expression, Immunocytochemistry, Transwell Migration Assay, Migration, Derivative Assay, Control

A) In vitro tumor spheroid (TS) assay to assess the treatment response to electroporation and CAR T-cell therapy. (1) TSs were formed within a low-adherent U-bottom 96-well, (2) then moved to a 4-well rectangular plate with low- conductivity buffer to (3) deliver electroporation via parallel plate electrodes. (4) The TSs were immediately moved back into the original U-bottom well, where (5) adjuvant CAR T-cells therapy or sham was delivered. B) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging of AsPC-1 TSs at 3 hours and 72 hours after treatment for different electric field magnitudes; scale bar is 1 mm. Normalized absorbance for the XTT assay at C) 3 hours and D) 72 hours post-treatment at different electric fields; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test and correction; mean ± SD; n=3. E) Green fluorescent intensity of FLuc-eGFP + AsPC-1 TSs over time across different electric fields. F) Normalized GFP intensity and G) TS area over time; One-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc between groups on the last timepoints (*p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001); Multiple One-Sample Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests between that timepoint and zero (# p < 0.05); n = 3.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Novel combination of irreversible electroporation and allogenic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy synergizes therapeutic outcomes in a preclinical human pancreatic cancer mouse model

doi: 10.1101/2025.08.10.669537

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) In vitro tumor spheroid (TS) assay to assess the treatment response to electroporation and CAR T-cell therapy. (1) TSs were formed within a low-adherent U-bottom 96-well, (2) then moved to a 4-well rectangular plate with low- conductivity buffer to (3) deliver electroporation via parallel plate electrodes. (4) The TSs were immediately moved back into the original U-bottom well, where (5) adjuvant CAR T-cells therapy or sham was delivered. B) Live (green) and dead (red) imaging of AsPC-1 TSs at 3 hours and 72 hours after treatment for different electric field magnitudes; scale bar is 1 mm. Normalized absorbance for the XTT assay at C) 3 hours and D) 72 hours post-treatment at different electric fields; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test and correction; mean ± SD; n=3. E) Green fluorescent intensity of FLuc-eGFP + AsPC-1 TSs over time across different electric fields. F) Normalized GFP intensity and G) TS area over time; One-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc between groups on the last timepoints (*p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001); Multiple One-Sample Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests between that timepoint and zero (# p < 0.05); n = 3.

Article Snippet: Pan02 mouse pancreatic cancer cells (Cytion, 300501), AsPC-1 human pancreatic cancer (CRL-1682), and Jurkat immortalized human T-lymphocytes (ATCC, TIB-152) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (ThermoFisher, 11875093) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Fisher Scientific, FB12999102) and 1% (v/v) 10,000 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, 16140122).

Techniques: In Vitro, Electroporation, Adjuvant, Imaging, XTT Assay

A) Green fluorescent intensity of FLuc-eGFP + AsPC-1 TS, B) deep-red intensity of cell tracker- stained CAR T-cells, and C) merged image over time for the CAR T-cell only and combinatorial treatment (both). D) Measured TS area and E) normalized eGFP intensity over time; One-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc between groups on the last time points (*p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001); n ≥ 3. F) Comparison of deep-red intensity within the tumor spheroid over time; Two-tailed T-tests between groups at each timepoint (# p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01), n ≥ 3.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Novel combination of irreversible electroporation and allogenic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy synergizes therapeutic outcomes in a preclinical human pancreatic cancer mouse model

doi: 10.1101/2025.08.10.669537

Figure Lengend Snippet: A) Green fluorescent intensity of FLuc-eGFP + AsPC-1 TS, B) deep-red intensity of cell tracker- stained CAR T-cells, and C) merged image over time for the CAR T-cell only and combinatorial treatment (both). D) Measured TS area and E) normalized eGFP intensity over time; One-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post hoc between groups on the last time points (*p < 0.05, ** p< 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p<0.0001); n ≥ 3. F) Comparison of deep-red intensity within the tumor spheroid over time; Two-tailed T-tests between groups at each timepoint (# p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01), n ≥ 3.

Article Snippet: Pan02 mouse pancreatic cancer cells (Cytion, 300501), AsPC-1 human pancreatic cancer (CRL-1682), and Jurkat immortalized human T-lymphocytes (ATCC, TIB-152) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (ThermoFisher, 11875093) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Fisher Scientific, FB12999102) and 1% (v/v) 10,000 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, 16140122).

Techniques: Staining, Comparison, Two Tailed Test

Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 AsPC1, and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).

Journal: Cancers

Article Title: Externally Applied Electromagnetic Fields and Hyperthermia Irreversibly Damage Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/cancers15133413

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of EMFs and HT on cancer cell viability. ( A ) Effect of EMFs. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100–500 kHz × 1–5 h). Control values (0 kHz) were 1.14 ± 0.03 A2058, 1.13 ± 0.04 AsPC1, and 1.20 ± 0.05 MDA-MB-231 (×10 6 ) viable cells ( n = 5 in all cases). * p < 0.05 comparing all conditions versus controls (0 kHz) ( n = 5 t -test). ( B ) Effect of HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to HT (42–52 °C × 20–40 min). * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 comparing all conditions versus controls (37 °C) ++ p < 0.01 comparing 40 min versus 20 min ( n = 5 t test). ( C ) Effect of EMFS and HT. Cancer cells were seeded and 24 h later exposed to EMFs (100 kHz × 4 h) and HT (52 °C × 40 min from min 120 to min 160 of the 4 h period where cells were constantly exposed to the EMFs). The surviving cells were cultured for 24 additional hours without further exposure to EMFs and HT. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different groups after 4 h of treatment with EMFs + HT and 24 h after. Different letters indicate differences p < 0.05 ( n = 5).

Article Snippet: Human AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells were obtained from GenTarget Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Control, Cell Culture

Effect of EMFs and HT on ROS generation and the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis.

Journal: Cancers

Article Title: Externally Applied Electromagnetic Fields and Hyperthermia Irreversibly Damage Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/cancers15133413

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of EMFs and HT on ROS generation and the molecular mechanisms of apoptosis.

Article Snippet: Human AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells were obtained from GenTarget Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques:

Effect of EMFs + HIFU-induced HT, gemcitabine and/or PT on the growth of AsPC1 pancreas carcinoma. Cancer cells were inoculated subcutaneously on day 0, and mice were treated with EMFs and HIFU as described under Materials and Methods. ( A ) EMFs and HIFU were applied once per day per three consecutive days (Monday to Wednesday) for two consecutive weeks starting on day 14 after tumor inoculation. Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) was administered twice on days 14 and 21. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups at each time point. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 15 mice per experimental group). ( B ) A disodium salt of PT phosphate (Chromadex Inc. Los Angeles CA) (100 mg of PT/kg) was administered i.p. (one dose 30 min before starting each irradiation session with EMFs and HT). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 12 mice per experimental group). ( C ) Representative images of mice inoculated with AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells and treated with EMFs HT and gemcitabine (GEM) or EMFs HT gemcitabine and PT.

Journal: Cancers

Article Title: Externally Applied Electromagnetic Fields and Hyperthermia Irreversibly Damage Cancer Cells

doi: 10.3390/cancers15133413

Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of EMFs + HIFU-induced HT, gemcitabine and/or PT on the growth of AsPC1 pancreas carcinoma. Cancer cells were inoculated subcutaneously on day 0, and mice were treated with EMFs and HIFU as described under Materials and Methods. ( A ) EMFs and HIFU were applied once per day per three consecutive days (Monday to Wednesday) for two consecutive weeks starting on day 14 after tumor inoculation. Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) was administered twice on days 14 and 21. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups at each time point. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 15 mice per experimental group). ( B ) A disodium salt of PT phosphate (Chromadex Inc. Los Angeles CA) (100 mg of PT/kg) was administered i.p. (one dose 30 min before starting each irradiation session with EMFs and HT). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to make comparisons among the different experimental groups. Different letters indicate statistical differences p < 0.05 ( n = 12 mice per experimental group). ( C ) Representative images of mice inoculated with AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells and treated with EMFs HT and gemcitabine (GEM) or EMFs HT gemcitabine and PT.

Article Snippet: Human AsPC1/Luciferase Stable Cells were obtained from GenTarget Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA).

Techniques: Irradiation, Luciferase