af647 Search Results


94
Lumiprobe af647
Af647, supplied by Lumiprobe, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/AF+647+NHS+ester/pm40885704-538-28-29
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
af647 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Synaptic Systems n1602 af647 l
N1602 Af647 L, supplied by Synaptic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/N1602-AF647-L/pmc13242099-1154-6-2
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
n1602 af647 l - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Synaptic Systems atto647n
Atto647n, supplied by Synaptic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/N0301-AF647-L/pmc10933366__41467_2024_46256_MOESM2_ESM-46-4-13
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
atto647n - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Synaptic Systems alfa sdab fluotag x2
Alfa Sdab Fluotag X2, supplied by Synaptic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/N1502-AF647-L/pm41637448-235-83-86
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
alfa sdab fluotag x2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Abbexa Ltd anti human igg f ab 2 conjugated
Anti Human Igg F Ab 2 Conjugated, supplied by Abbexa Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/Goat+Anti-Human+IgG+F(ab')2+Antibody+(AF647)/pmc11163786-131-15-23
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human igg f ab 2 conjugated - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Lumiprobe alexa 647
Alexa 647, supplied by Lumiprobe, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/AF+647+carboxylic+acid/pmc11310910-177-15-21
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
alexa 647 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Abbexa Ltd anti porcine igg af647
Anti Porcine Igg Af647, supplied by Abbexa Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/Mouse+Anti-Pig+IgG+(H%26amp%3BL)+Antibody+(AF647)/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__15__725346-307-15-17
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti porcine igg af647 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Biosynth Carbosynth rgd peptides conjugated with alexafluor647 ac cgrgdsk af647 amide
Rgd Peptides Conjugated With Alexafluor647 Ac Cgrgdsk Af647 Amide, supplied by Biosynth Carbosynth, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/%5BAF647%5D-RGD+peptide/pm28723958-136-0-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rgd peptides conjugated with alexafluor647 ac cgrgdsk af647 amide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Lumiprobe af647 azide
Af647 Azide, supplied by Lumiprobe, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/AF+647+azide/bio_rxiv__64898__2025__12__22__695869-218-34-36
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
af647 azide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
SouthernBiotech goat anti human kappa alexa fluor 647 antibody
Goat Anti Human Kappa Alexa Fluor 647 Antibody, supplied by SouthernBiotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/Goat+Anti-Human+Kappa%2C+Monkey+ads-AF647/pm32914549-211-35-41
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti human kappa alexa fluor 647 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio-Techne corporation exosomes
a The flow chart illustrates the process of treating BM-MSCs with GC-CM, and evaluation of the resulting BM-MSC phenotype and function. b , c The ability to educate BM-MSCs was compared between LNM-GCs (SGC-7901 and HGC-27) and primary GCs (AGS and MGC-803). d LNM-GC <t>exosomes</t> <t>and</t> <t>exosome-free</t> CM were prepared as indicated in the flow chart. e , f BM-MSCs were treated with CM, exosomes, or exosome-free CM from LNM-GCs. The educational effect of the three treatments on BM-MSCs was then compared. b , e Immunofluorescence detection of α-SMA in BM-MSCs was conducted to detect their tumor-promoting phenotype (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). c , f GC migration and invasiveness analysis, and HLEC tubule formation assay, were performed to analyze the tumor-promoting function of BM-MSCs. The number of migrated and invaded GCs and tubule junctions were counted and represented in column charts. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05; ns, non significant.
Exosomes, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/tri-GalNAc-C5-AF647/pmc07994201-88-111--1
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
exosomes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CellSystems Biotechnologie Vertrieb GmbH bovine lactadherin-af647 (1:10)
a The flow chart illustrates the process of treating BM-MSCs with GC-CM, and evaluation of the resulting BM-MSC phenotype and function. b , c The ability to educate BM-MSCs was compared between LNM-GCs (SGC-7901 and HGC-27) and primary GCs (AGS and MGC-803). d LNM-GC <t>exosomes</t> <t>and</t> <t>exosome-free</t> CM were prepared as indicated in the flow chart. e , f BM-MSCs were treated with CM, exosomes, or exosome-free CM from LNM-GCs. The educational effect of the three treatments on BM-MSCs was then compared. b , e Immunofluorescence detection of α-SMA in BM-MSCs was conducted to detect their tumor-promoting phenotype (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). c , f GC migration and invasiveness analysis, and HLEC tubule formation assay, were performed to analyze the tumor-promoting function of BM-MSCs. The number of migrated and invaded GCs and tubule junctions were counted and represented in column charts. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05; ns, non significant.
Bovine Lactadherin Af647 (1:10), supplied by CellSystems Biotechnologie Vertrieb GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/af647/bovine+lactadherin+af647++1+10+/pmc11765890-186-3-6
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bovine lactadherin-af647 (1:10) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a The flow chart illustrates the process of treating BM-MSCs with GC-CM, and evaluation of the resulting BM-MSC phenotype and function. b , c The ability to educate BM-MSCs was compared between LNM-GCs (SGC-7901 and HGC-27) and primary GCs (AGS and MGC-803). d LNM-GC exosomes and exosome-free CM were prepared as indicated in the flow chart. e , f BM-MSCs were treated with CM, exosomes, or exosome-free CM from LNM-GCs. The educational effect of the three treatments on BM-MSCs was then compared. b , e Immunofluorescence detection of α-SMA in BM-MSCs was conducted to detect their tumor-promoting phenotype (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). c , f GC migration and invasiveness analysis, and HLEC tubule formation assay, were performed to analyze the tumor-promoting function of BM-MSCs. The number of migrated and invaded GCs and tubule junctions were counted and represented in column charts. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05; ns, non significant.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Lymph node metastasis-derived gastric cancer cells educate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via YAP signaling activation by exosomal Wnt5a

doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01722-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a The flow chart illustrates the process of treating BM-MSCs with GC-CM, and evaluation of the resulting BM-MSC phenotype and function. b , c The ability to educate BM-MSCs was compared between LNM-GCs (SGC-7901 and HGC-27) and primary GCs (AGS and MGC-803). d LNM-GC exosomes and exosome-free CM were prepared as indicated in the flow chart. e , f BM-MSCs were treated with CM, exosomes, or exosome-free CM from LNM-GCs. The educational effect of the three treatments on BM-MSCs was then compared. b , e Immunofluorescence detection of α-SMA in BM-MSCs was conducted to detect their tumor-promoting phenotype (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). c , f GC migration and invasiveness analysis, and HLEC tubule formation assay, were performed to analyze the tumor-promoting function of BM-MSCs. The number of migrated and invaded GCs and tubule junctions were counted and represented in column charts. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05; ns, non significant.

Article Snippet: GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm).

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Migration, Tube Formation Assay

a , b Comparison of cellular and exosomal levels of the Wnt5a protein in AGS and SGC-7901 using western blotting. c Detection of Wnt5a protein in BM-MSCs after treatment with CHX (15 μg/ml) alone or with exosomes at the indicated times. d – g AGS stably transfected with pCMV-GFP and pCMV-Wnt5a-GFP were separately established. GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm). Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s t test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Lymph node metastasis-derived gastric cancer cells educate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via YAP signaling activation by exosomal Wnt5a

doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01722-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b Comparison of cellular and exosomal levels of the Wnt5a protein in AGS and SGC-7901 using western blotting. c Detection of Wnt5a protein in BM-MSCs after treatment with CHX (15 μg/ml) alone or with exosomes at the indicated times. d – g AGS stably transfected with pCMV-GFP and pCMV-Wnt5a-GFP were separately established. GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm). Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s t test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm).

Techniques: Comparison, Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Transfection, Incubation, Expressing, Infection, Derivative Assay, In Vivo, Immunohistochemistry

a – d Characterization of serum exosomes isolated from healthy participants (H), GC patients without LNM (NM), and GC patients with LNM (M). a Representative TEM images of exosomes (magnification, ×60,000; scale bars, 100 μm). b Size distribution of exosomes analyzed using NTA; c Detection of CD81 expression by flow cytometry. d Western blotting analysis of CD63 and CD9 expression. e , f Comparison of BM-MSC-educating capacity among exosomes from the three groups described above. e Detection α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). f Analysis of tumor-promoting properties of BM-MSCs. g , h Wnt5a expression in exosomes isolated from the pooled sera was detected by western blotting. g Representative image. h Fold changes in relative gray values of Wnt5a; i , j Serum concentration of exosomal Wnt5a was detected using ELISA. i Serum concentration of exosomal Wnt5a in clinical serum samples (20 individuals per group). j Wnt5a concentration in serum samples from the LNM model described in Figs. , . Data are presented using means ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05; ns, non significant.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Lymph node metastasis-derived gastric cancer cells educate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via YAP signaling activation by exosomal Wnt5a

doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01722-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a – d Characterization of serum exosomes isolated from healthy participants (H), GC patients without LNM (NM), and GC patients with LNM (M). a Representative TEM images of exosomes (magnification, ×60,000; scale bars, 100 μm). b Size distribution of exosomes analyzed using NTA; c Detection of CD81 expression by flow cytometry. d Western blotting analysis of CD63 and CD9 expression. e , f Comparison of BM-MSC-educating capacity among exosomes from the three groups described above. e Detection α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). f Analysis of tumor-promoting properties of BM-MSCs. g , h Wnt5a expression in exosomes isolated from the pooled sera was detected by western blotting. g Representative image. h Fold changes in relative gray values of Wnt5a; i , j Serum concentration of exosomal Wnt5a was detected using ELISA. i Serum concentration of exosomal Wnt5a in clinical serum samples (20 individuals per group). j Wnt5a concentration in serum samples from the LNM model described in Figs. , . Data are presented using means ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; * P < 0.05; ns, non significant.

Article Snippet: GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm).

Techniques: Isolation, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Comparison, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

a – d Characterization of AGS- and SGC-7901-exosomes. a Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (magnification, ×60,000; scale bars, 100 μm). b Size distribution shown by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). c Flow cytometry analysis of CD81 expression. d Western blotting analysis of CD63 and CD9 expression. e – i The ability of AGS- and SGC-7901-exosomes to educate BM-MSCs was evaluated. e α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). f Quantification of migration, invasion, and tubule formation. g – i In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties of BM-MSCs. g The draining popliteal lymph nodes (LNs) from each group were harvested and imaged. h Weight of popliteal LNs. i Immunohistochemistry analysis of pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs. Representative images from each group are shown (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; ns, non significant.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Lymph node metastasis-derived gastric cancer cells educate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via YAP signaling activation by exosomal Wnt5a

doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01722-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a – d Characterization of AGS- and SGC-7901-exosomes. a Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (magnification, ×60,000; scale bars, 100 μm). b Size distribution shown by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). c Flow cytometry analysis of CD81 expression. d Western blotting analysis of CD63 and CD9 expression. e – i The ability of AGS- and SGC-7901-exosomes to educate BM-MSCs was evaluated. e α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). f Quantification of migration, invasion, and tubule formation. g – i In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties of BM-MSCs. g The draining popliteal lymph nodes (LNs) from each group were harvested and imaged. h Weight of popliteal LNs. i Immunohistochemistry analysis of pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs. Representative images from each group are shown (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm). Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; ns, non significant.

Article Snippet: GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm).

Techniques: Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Western Blot, Migration, In Vivo, Immunohistochemistry

a The flow chart shows removal of exosomal proteins by proteinase K alone or combined with Triton X-100, and purification of these treated exosomes by ultrafiltration centrifugal tubes. b SDS-PAGE and Coomassie brilliant blue stain were used to confirm that proteins were indeed removed from SGC-7901 exosomes. c , d The influence of protein removal on education of BM-MSCs by SGC-7901 exosomes. c Immunofluorescence detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). d Quantification of migrated and invaded GCs, and formed tubule junctions. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; ns, non significant.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Lymph node metastasis-derived gastric cancer cells educate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via YAP signaling activation by exosomal Wnt5a

doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01722-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a The flow chart shows removal of exosomal proteins by proteinase K alone or combined with Triton X-100, and purification of these treated exosomes by ultrafiltration centrifugal tubes. b SDS-PAGE and Coomassie brilliant blue stain were used to confirm that proteins were indeed removed from SGC-7901 exosomes. c , d The influence of protein removal on education of BM-MSCs by SGC-7901 exosomes. c Immunofluorescence detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). d Quantification of migrated and invaded GCs, and formed tubule junctions. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01; ns, non significant.

Article Snippet: GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm).

Techniques: Purification, SDS Page, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Expressing

a – d Western blotting analysis of p-YAP s127 and YAP levels in BM-MSCs treated with GC exosomes ( a ), serum exosomes isolated from healthy individuals (H), GC patients without (NM), and those with regional LNM (M) ( b ), exosomes from lentivirus-infected AGS cells ( c ), and exosomes from oligonucleotide-transfected SGC-7901 cells ( d ). e – j BM-MSCs were pretreated with verteporfin before incubation with SGC-7901 exosomes ( e , g , h ) and serum exosomes isolated from GC patients with LNM ( f , i , j ). e , f Western blot analysis of CTGF and CYR61 in BM-MSCs. g , i Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). h , j Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s t test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01.

Journal: Oncogene

Article Title: Lymph node metastasis-derived gastric cancer cells educate bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via YAP signaling activation by exosomal Wnt5a

doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01722-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a – d Western blotting analysis of p-YAP s127 and YAP levels in BM-MSCs treated with GC exosomes ( a ), serum exosomes isolated from healthy individuals (H), GC patients without (NM), and those with regional LNM (M) ( b ), exosomes from lentivirus-infected AGS cells ( c ), and exosomes from oligonucleotide-transfected SGC-7901 cells ( d ). e – j BM-MSCs were pretreated with verteporfin before incubation with SGC-7901 exosomes ( e , g , h ) and serum exosomes isolated from GC patients with LNM ( f , i , j ). e , f Western blot analysis of CTGF and CYR61 in BM-MSCs. g , i Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). h , j Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using Student’s t test. *** P < 0.0001; ** P < 0.01.

Article Snippet: GFP and Wnt5a in cells and their exosomes were individually detected by western blot. h Exosome internalization analysis in BM-MSCs after incubation with exosomes from the abovenamed two stably transfected AGS (magnification, ×400; scale bars, 25 μm). i Screening for the most efficient siRNA against Wnt5a (si-Wnt5a) in SGC-7901. j Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a expression in SGC-7901 cells, and analysis of their secreted exosomes after transfection of SGC-7901 with si-Wnt5a and NC. k – o si-Wnt5a- and NC-transfected SGC-7901 exosomes were separately used to treat BM-MSCs in order to compare their effects in education of BM-MSCs. p , q Western blotting analysis of Wnt5a in AGS and in their secreted exosomes after AGS were infected with the pLV-Wnt5a lentivirus. r – v Exosomes derived from pLV-Wnt5a- and pLV-vec-lentivirus-infected AGS were separately used to treat BM-MSCs to observe their BM-MSC-reprogramming abilities. k , r Detection of α-SMA expression in BM-MSCs (magnification, ×200; scale bars, 50 μm). l , s Numbers of migrated and invaded GCs and formed tubule junctions. m – o , t – v In vivo analysis of tumor-promoting properties in BM-MSCs. m , t The draining popliteal LNs harvested from the above groups. n , u Weight of popliteal LNs. o , v Pan-cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) expression in popliteal LNs detected using immunohistochemistry (magnification, ×100, scale bars, 100 μm; magnification, ×400, scale bars, 20 μm).

Techniques: Western Blot, Isolation, Infection, Transfection, Incubation, Expressing