3d comsol simulation model Search Results


90
COMSOL Inc three-dimensional simulation model
Three Dimensional Simulation Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+simulation+model/pmc09695967-50-7-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
three-dimensional simulation model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc comsol-simulated 3d model of aunrs and auvnrs
Comsol Simulated 3d Model Of Aunrs And Auvnrs, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/comsol+simulated+3d+model+of+aunrs+and+auvnrs/pmc10665589__mmc2-43-18-18
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
comsol-simulated 3d model of aunrs and auvnrs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d transcranial single-source dipole numerical simulation model
Schematic diagram of the ultrasound modulated electroencephalography (USMEEG) principle. EEG, electroencephalography; tFUS, <t>transcranial</t> focused ultrasound; Chan., channel.
3d Transcranial Single Source Dipole Numerical Simulation Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+transcranial+single+source+dipole+numerical+simulation+model/pmc11981584-143-1-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d transcranial single-source dipole numerical simulation model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d model simulating the debinding process
The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the <t>debinding</t> step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Model Simulating The Debinding Process, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+model+simulating+the+debinding+process/pmc08913829-66-22-27
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d model simulating the debinding process - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d electrostatic-fluid-structure multiphysics coupling finite element simulation model
The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the <t>debinding</t> step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Electrostatic Fluid Structure Multiphysics Coupling Finite Element Simulation Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+electrostatic+fluid+structure+multiphysics+coupling+finite+element+simulation+model/pmc08838054-62-20-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d electrostatic-fluid-structure multiphysics coupling finite element simulation model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d model comsol reservoir simulator
The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the <t>debinding</t> step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Model Comsol Reservoir Simulator, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+model+comsol+reservoir+simulator/pmc10850597-337-13-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d model comsol reservoir simulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc fully coupled electro-fluid-structural mechanics 3d numerical simulation model
The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the <t>debinding</t> step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
Fully Coupled Electro Fluid Structural Mechanics 3d Numerical Simulation Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+electro+fluid+solid+mechanics+simulation+model/pmc03658734-167-16-23
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fully coupled electro-fluid-structural mechanics 3d numerical simulation model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d model for simulation of local heating with laser irradiation
The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the <t>debinding</t> step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Model For Simulation Of Local Heating With Laser Irradiation, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+model+for+simulation+of+local+heating+with+laser+irradiation/pmc11633761__sciadv__adn0110_sm-14-27-38
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d model for simulation of local heating with laser irradiation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d simulation model of the magnetostrictive layer (fegab)
FEA models in COMSOL software. ( a ) Material: the magnetic composite, ( i ) <t>a</t> <t>3D</t> model in an air-filled cavity for eddy current and magnetostriction simulation; ( ii ) magnetic <t>composite—FeGaB</t> inserted by alumina layers; ( iii ) suppression of eddy current loss—eddy current loops isolated by uniformly laminated alumina in FeGaB. ( b ) Structure: ME coupling effect of the piezomagnetic/piezoelectric heterostructure. ( c ) Device: resonance frequency matching between the FMR of the magnetic composite and the resonance frequency of the BAW resonator.
3d Simulation Model Of The Magnetostrictive Layer (Fegab), supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+simulation+model+of+the+magnetostrictive+layer++fegab+/pmc08878325-32-11-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d simulation model of the magnetostrictive layer (fegab) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d fem simulation model comsol multiphysics54
FEA models in COMSOL software. ( a ) Material: the magnetic composite, ( i ) <t>a</t> <t>3D</t> model in an air-filled cavity for eddy current and magnetostriction simulation; ( ii ) magnetic <t>composite—FeGaB</t> inserted by alumina layers; ( iii ) suppression of eddy current loss—eddy current loops isolated by uniformly laminated alumina in FeGaB. ( b ) Structure: ME coupling effect of the piezomagnetic/piezoelectric heterostructure. ( c ) Device: resonance frequency matching between the FMR of the magnetic composite and the resonance frequency of the BAW resonator.
3d Fem Simulation Model Comsol Multiphysics54, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+fem+simulation+model+comsol+multiphysics54/pm36507557-168-10-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fem simulation model comsol multiphysics54 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d simulation model of the microchamber
FEA models in COMSOL software. ( a ) Material: the magnetic composite, ( i ) <t>a</t> <t>3D</t> model in an air-filled cavity for eddy current and magnetostriction simulation; ( ii ) magnetic <t>composite—FeGaB</t> inserted by alumina layers; ( iii ) suppression of eddy current loss—eddy current loops isolated by uniformly laminated alumina in FeGaB. ( b ) Structure: ME coupling effect of the piezomagnetic/piezoelectric heterostructure. ( c ) Device: resonance frequency matching between the FMR of the magnetic composite and the resonance frequency of the BAW resonator.
3d Simulation Model Of The Microchamber, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3d+simulation+model+of+the+microchamber/pm36227058__nn2c08266_si_001-63-6-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d simulation model of the microchamber - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3-d model simulating the discrete lens performance
FEA models in COMSOL software. ( a ) Material: the magnetic composite, ( i ) <t>a</t> <t>3D</t> model in an air-filled cavity for eddy current and magnetostriction simulation; ( ii ) magnetic <t>composite—FeGaB</t> inserted by alumina layers; ( iii ) suppression of eddy current loss—eddy current loops isolated by uniformly laminated alumina in FeGaB. ( b ) Structure: ME coupling effect of the piezomagnetic/piezoelectric heterostructure. ( c ) Device: resonance frequency matching between the FMR of the magnetic composite and the resonance frequency of the BAW resonator.
3 D Model Simulating The Discrete Lens Performance, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+comsol+simulation+model/3+d+model+simulating+the+discrete+lens+performance/10__1109_slash_tmtt__2017__2727495-158-15-25
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3-d model simulating the discrete lens performance - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Schematic diagram of the ultrasound modulated electroencephalography (USMEEG) principle. EEG, electroencephalography; tFUS, transcranial focused ultrasound; Chan., channel.

Journal: Cyborg and Bionic Systems

Article Title: Noninvasive Intracranial Source Signal Localization and Decoding with High Spatiotemporal Resolution

doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0206

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram of the ultrasound modulated electroencephalography (USMEEG) principle. EEG, electroencephalography; tFUS, transcranial focused ultrasound; Chan., channel.

Article Snippet: The 3D transcranial single-source dipole numerical simulation model was constructed based on the above skull model and COMSOL 6.0 as shown in Fig. B1, and the ultrasound raster scanning area is shown in Fig. B2, with the yellow star shape as the neuron setting position and the red dots as the ultrasound irradiation point positions.

Techniques:

Schematic of the flow of the decoding and localization algorithm for acoustoelectric signals, 3D transcranial single-source dipole localization simulation model, and schematic diagram of the ultrasound irradiation strategy and electrocorticography (ECoG) signal compared to the fitted signal. (A1) Flowchart of the envelope decoding and localization algorithm . (A2) Flowchart of the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) sideband localization algorithm. (B1) Numerical simulation model. (B2) Schematic diagram of the ultrasound irradiation strategy. (C1) S1 analog source signal. (C2) S2 analog source signal. (C3) S3 analog source signal. (C4) S4 analog source signal. AE, acoustoelectric effect.

Journal: Cyborg and Bionic Systems

Article Title: Noninvasive Intracranial Source Signal Localization and Decoding with High Spatiotemporal Resolution

doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0206

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic of the flow of the decoding and localization algorithm for acoustoelectric signals, 3D transcranial single-source dipole localization simulation model, and schematic diagram of the ultrasound irradiation strategy and electrocorticography (ECoG) signal compared to the fitted signal. (A1) Flowchart of the envelope decoding and localization algorithm . (A2) Flowchart of the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) sideband localization algorithm. (B1) Numerical simulation model. (B2) Schematic diagram of the ultrasound irradiation strategy. (C1) S1 analog source signal. (C2) S2 analog source signal. (C3) S3 analog source signal. (C4) S4 analog source signal. AE, acoustoelectric effect.

Article Snippet: The 3D transcranial single-source dipole numerical simulation model was constructed based on the above skull model and COMSOL 6.0 as shown in Fig. B1, and the ultrasound raster scanning area is shown in Fig. B2, with the yellow star shape as the neuron setting position and the red dots as the ultrasound irradiation point positions.

Techniques: Irradiation

(A) Schematic of the delay distribution of the array elements (the darker the color, the higher the delay). (B) Acoustic pressure field before and after transcranial modulation. (C) Comparison results of the focal acoustic pressure and mechanical index (MI). (D) Distribution of transcranial TR-modulated onset temperature field.

Journal: Cyborg and Bionic Systems

Article Title: Noninvasive Intracranial Source Signal Localization and Decoding with High Spatiotemporal Resolution

doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0206

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the delay distribution of the array elements (the darker the color, the higher the delay). (B) Acoustic pressure field before and after transcranial modulation. (C) Comparison results of the focal acoustic pressure and mechanical index (MI). (D) Distribution of transcranial TR-modulated onset temperature field.

Article Snippet: The 3D transcranial single-source dipole numerical simulation model was constructed based on the above skull model and COMSOL 6.0 as shown in Fig. B1, and the ultrasound raster scanning area is shown in Fig. B2, with the yellow star shape as the neuron setting position and the red dots as the ultrasound irradiation point positions.

Techniques: Comparison

Focal acoustic pressure and MI for each modulation method

Journal: Cyborg and Bionic Systems

Article Title: Noninvasive Intracranial Source Signal Localization and Decoding with High Spatiotemporal Resolution

doi: 10.34133/cbsystems.0206

Figure Lengend Snippet: Focal acoustic pressure and MI for each modulation method

Article Snippet: The 3D transcranial single-source dipole numerical simulation model was constructed based on the above skull model and COMSOL 6.0 as shown in Fig. B1, and the ultrasound raster scanning area is shown in Fig. B2, with the yellow star shape as the neuron setting position and the red dots as the ultrasound irradiation point positions.

Techniques:

The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Production of a monolithic fuel cell stack with high power density

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28970-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.

Article Snippet: To identify the process parameters required to achieve an optimized monolith (avoiding disintegration and warpage during debinding), a 3D model simulating the debinding process was developed using COMSOL Multiphysics.

Techniques:

FEA models in COMSOL software. ( a ) Material: the magnetic composite, ( i ) a 3D model in an air-filled cavity for eddy current and magnetostriction simulation; ( ii ) magnetic composite—FeGaB inserted by alumina layers; ( iii ) suppression of eddy current loss—eddy current loops isolated by uniformly laminated alumina in FeGaB. ( b ) Structure: ME coupling effect of the piezomagnetic/piezoelectric heterostructure. ( c ) Device: resonance frequency matching between the FMR of the magnetic composite and the resonance frequency of the BAW resonator.

Journal: Micromachines

Article Title: Design and Optimization of a BAW Magnetic Sensor Based on Magnetoelectric Coupling

doi: 10.3390/mi13020206

Figure Lengend Snippet: FEA models in COMSOL software. ( a ) Material: the magnetic composite, ( i ) a 3D model in an air-filled cavity for eddy current and magnetostriction simulation; ( ii ) magnetic composite—FeGaB inserted by alumina layers; ( iii ) suppression of eddy current loss—eddy current loops isolated by uniformly laminated alumina in FeGaB. ( b ) Structure: ME coupling effect of the piezomagnetic/piezoelectric heterostructure. ( c ) Device: resonance frequency matching between the FMR of the magnetic composite and the resonance frequency of the BAW resonator.

Article Snippet: As shown in a, a 3D simulation model of the magnetostrictive layer (FeGaB) was built in COMSOL Multiphysics software, and parameters of the films were referenced from data from Northeastern University.

Techniques: Software, Isolation