a muciniphila type strain muc t (ATCC)
Structured Review

A Muciniphila Type Strain Muc T, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 806 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/a muciniphila type strain muc t/product/ATCC
Average 98 stars, based on 806 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Differential in vitro and in vivo responses of Akkermansia muciniphila to Odontosoria biflora (Kaulf.) C.Chr. [ Lindsaeaceae ] hexane extract in diet- and alloxan-induced BALB/c mice"
Article Title: Differential in vitro and in vivo responses of Akkermansia muciniphila to Odontosoria biflora (Kaulf.) C.Chr. [ Lindsaeaceae ] hexane extract in diet- and alloxan-induced BALB/c mice
Journal: Acta Biochimica Polonica
doi: 10.3389/abp.2026.16199
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of the different extracts of O. biflora on the growth of A. muciniphila . The percentage relative growth yield of Akkermansia muciniphila cultured in Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) medium, supplemented with Odontosoria biflora extract (OBE) obtained using different extraction solvents, namely aqueous (AQ), ethyl acetate (ETAC), methanol (MEOH), and hexane (HEX), is presented. The bacterial strain was cultivated in BHI medium, with and without glucose-supplemented OBE, at final concentrations of 250 mg/mL and 500 mg/mL, and its growth was assessed via OD620 measurements. The experiment was conducted in three independent trials, each performed in triplicate. Statistical significance relative to the control is indicated by asterisks (p ≤ 0.05).
Techniques Used: Cell Culture, Extraction, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Relative Akkermansia muciniphila -specific signal in fecal samples of BALB/c mice. Relative detection levels were quantified using a modified 2 − ΔΔCt approach with external A. muciniphila ATCC genomic DNA as reference and the normal group as biological calibrator. Data represented as mean ± SE. Statistical significance was determined by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test ( p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001).
Techniques Used: Modification
