Review



low frequency delta theta alpha band  (Millipore)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 86
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Millipore low frequency delta theta alpha band
    Cue-elicited power changes did not predict post-TMR endorsements or positive endorsement speed (A) Grand averaged ERPs across frontal-central electrodes (Fz/1/2, Cz/1/2, and FC1/2). Shaded area indicates significant time point when comparing ERPs against zero. Top right panel presents group average scalp topography of ERPs in response to TMR cues in corresponding to the two positive clusters; with black circles highlighting the electrodes used in the ERP analysis. (B) Contour plot depicting the temporal and spectral characteristics of the significant clusters. Cluster a represents the low-frequency <t>delta-theta-alpha</t> band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).
    Low Frequency Delta Theta Alpha Band, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/low frequency delta theta alpha band/product/Millipore
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    low frequency delta theta alpha band - by Bioz Stars, 2025-01
    86/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Reactivating cue approached positive personality traits during sleep promotes positive self-referential processing"

    Article Title: Reactivating cue approached positive personality traits during sleep promotes positive self-referential processing

    Journal: iScience

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110341

    Cue-elicited power changes did not predict post-TMR endorsements or positive endorsement speed (A) Grand averaged ERPs across frontal-central electrodes (Fz/1/2, Cz/1/2, and FC1/2). Shaded area indicates significant time point when comparing ERPs against zero. Top right panel presents group average scalp topography of ERPs in response to TMR cues in corresponding to the two positive clusters; with black circles highlighting the electrodes used in the ERP analysis. (B) Contour plot depicting the temporal and spectral characteristics of the significant clusters. Cluster a represents the low-frequency delta-theta-alpha band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Cue-elicited power changes did not predict post-TMR endorsements or positive endorsement speed (A) Grand averaged ERPs across frontal-central electrodes (Fz/1/2, Cz/1/2, and FC1/2). Shaded area indicates significant time point when comparing ERPs against zero. Top right panel presents group average scalp topography of ERPs in response to TMR cues in corresponding to the two positive clusters; with black circles highlighting the electrodes used in the ERP analysis. (B) Contour plot depicting the temporal and spectral characteristics of the significant clusters. Cluster a represents the low-frequency delta-theta-alpha band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    low frequency delta theta alpha band  (Millipore)
    86
    Millipore low frequency delta theta alpha band
    Cue-elicited power changes did not predict post-TMR endorsements or positive endorsement speed (A) Grand averaged ERPs across frontal-central electrodes (Fz/1/2, Cz/1/2, and FC1/2). Shaded area indicates significant time point when comparing ERPs against zero. Top right panel presents group average scalp topography of ERPs in response to TMR cues in corresponding to the two positive clusters; with black circles highlighting the electrodes used in the ERP analysis. (B) Contour plot depicting the temporal and spectral characteristics of the significant clusters. Cluster a represents the low-frequency <t>delta-theta-alpha</t> band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).
    Low Frequency Delta Theta Alpha Band, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/low frequency delta theta alpha band/product/Millipore
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    Price from $9.99 to $1999.99
    low frequency delta theta alpha band - by Bioz Stars, 2025-01
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Cue-elicited power changes did not predict post-TMR endorsements or positive endorsement speed (A) Grand averaged ERPs across frontal-central electrodes (Fz/1/2, Cz/1/2, and FC1/2). Shaded area indicates significant time point when comparing ERPs against zero. Top right panel presents group average scalp topography of ERPs in response to TMR cues in corresponding to the two positive clusters; with black circles highlighting the electrodes used in the ERP analysis. (B) Contour plot depicting the temporal and spectral characteristics of the significant clusters. Cluster a represents the low-frequency delta-theta-alpha band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Reactivating cue approached positive personality traits during sleep promotes positive self-referential processing

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110341

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cue-elicited power changes did not predict post-TMR endorsements or positive endorsement speed (A) Grand averaged ERPs across frontal-central electrodes (Fz/1/2, Cz/1/2, and FC1/2). Shaded area indicates significant time point when comparing ERPs against zero. Top right panel presents group average scalp topography of ERPs in response to TMR cues in corresponding to the two positive clusters; with black circles highlighting the electrodes used in the ERP analysis. (B) Contour plot depicting the temporal and spectral characteristics of the significant clusters. Cluster a represents the low-frequency delta-theta-alpha band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: Cluster a represents the low-frequency delta-theta-alpha band (1–12 Hz), and cluster b represents the sigma-beta band (10–30 Hz), with both clusters showing significant changes across the TMR time course (cluster-based permutation-corrected p < 0.001).

    Techniques: