c5ar1 (Proteintech)
Structured Review

C5ar1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 41 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c5ar1/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 41 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Citalopram exhibits immune-dependent anti-tumor effects by modulating C5aR1 + TAMs"
Article Title: Citalopram exhibits immune-dependent anti-tumor effects by modulating C5aR1 + TAMs
Journal: eLife
doi: 10.7554/eLife.103016
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) identified GLUT1 and C5aR1 as two top hits related to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-induced gene changes. ( B ) GSEA of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) RNA-seq data (TCGA cohort) with the SSRI-related gene signature. Sample grouping was made based on the median expression of C5aR1. ( C ) Representative immunohistochemical images showed the expression pattern and cellular distribution of C5aR1 in human HCC tissues. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( D ) Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis showed the expression pattern of C5aR1 with the immune microenvironment of HCC. ( E ) Co-immunofluorescence of C5aR1 (green) with CD163 (red) in HCC samples. Scale bar, 10 μm. ( F ) The drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS) assay and immunoblot analysis showed C5aR1 protein stability against 5 μg/ml pronase in the presence and absence of 100 μM citalopram treatment. ( G ) The DARTS assay and immunoblot analysis showed C5aR1 protein stability against 5 μg/ml pronase in the presence of different concentrations of citalopram treatment. ( H ) The overall conformation of citalopram binding to C5aR1. ( I ) Representative models of citalopram in pose-1 (left), pose-2 (middle), and allosteric site (right). Several polar interactions were indicated by black dashed lines. ( J ) HEK293T cells were transfected with either WT or mutant C5aR1 expression plasmids for 48 hr, followed by DARTS assay with immunoblotting analysis of C5aR1 protein levels. In all panels, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Values as mean ± SD and compared by the Student’s t test ( F ) or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multiple comparisons with Tukey’s method among groups ( G, J ). Figure 2—source data 1. Original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 2—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Single Cell, Immunofluorescence, Western Blot, Binding Assay, Transfection, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) of SMART-seq2-based single CD45 + cells. The tSNE (by cluster) was acquired from http://cancer-pku.cn:3838/HCC/ . ( B ) The UMAP showing C5AR1 expression in HCC immune cell clusters. ( C ) Violin plot showing C5AR1 expression in different immune cell clusters.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) The drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS) assay and immunoblot analysis showed C5aR1 protein stability against 5 μg/ml pronase in the presence of different concentrations of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) treatment (0, 1, 10, 50, and 100 μM). ( B ) For C5aR1, the predicted binding energy distribution of the clusters with poses more than 50. ( C ) Sequencing analysis showed the successful generation of six C5aR1 mutants. ( D ) The best-scored complex models of C5aR1 with other four different SSRIs. ( E ) HEK293T cells were transfected with either WT or mutant C5aR1 (D282A) expression plasmids for 48 hr, followed by DARTS assay with immunoblotting analysis of C5aR1 protein levels. In all panels, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Values are presented as mean ± SD and compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multiple comparisons with Tukey’s method among groups ( E ). Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 2—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Binding Assay, Sequencing, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Western blotting showed the knockdown efficiency of GLUT1 in mouse Hepa1-6 cells. ( B ) GLUT1 KD Hepa1-6 cells were subcutaneously injected into the Rag1 −/− or immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice, and mice were treated with 5 mg/kg citalopram when bore visible tumors; 3 weeks later, tumor burden was examined ( n = 6–7 per group). ( C ) The growth kinetics of GLUT1 KD Hepa1-6 tumors in C5ar1 +/− and C5ar1 −/− C57BL/6 host ( n = 7). ( D ) Immunofluorescence analysis of C5a deposition in GLUT1 KD Hepa1-6 tumors from C5ar1 +/− and C5ar1 −/− C57BL/6 host. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( E ) Experimental design of bone marrow transfer experiments. ( F, G, I ) GLUT1 KD Hepa1-6 cells were subcutaneously implanted into syngeneic recipient (r) mice that had been reconstituted with bone marrow cells from either C5ar1 +/− or C5ar1 −/− donor mice. The therapeutic effect of citalopram ( F ), C5a deposition ( G ), and macrophage phagocytosis ( I ) in this model was analyzed. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( H ) The phagocytic capacity of macrophages isolated from GLUT1 KD Hepa1-6 tumors in C5ar1 +/− and C5ar1 −/− C57BL/6 host. Flow cytometry showed the infiltration of CD45 + CD11b + F4/80 + macrophages ( J ), CD206 + TAMs and CD11b + TAMs ( K ), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes ( L ) in tumor tissues from orthotopic xenograft model, which was generated in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice with Hepa1-6 cells ( n = 5 per group). ( M, N ) Measurement of CD8 + T cell function in tumor tissues from the groups mentioned in C and F . ( O ) The growth kinetics of GLUT1 KD Hepa1-6 tumors in C5ar1 +/− and C5ar1 −/− C57BL/6 host upon CD8 + T cell depletion ( n = 7). ( P ) Correlation analysis of C5aR1 expression and immune checkpoint molecules, gene signatures of TAMs, exhausted T cells, and effector Tregs in the TCGA cohort ( n = 371). In all panels, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, non-significant. Values are presented as mean ± SD and compared by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons ( B, C, F, O ), Student’s t test ( H–M ), one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons with Tukey’s method ( B, N ), and the Spearman’s rank correlation methods ( P ). Figure 3—source data 1. Original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands. Figure 3—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Knockdown, Injection, Immunofluorescence, Isolation, Flow Cytometry, Generated, Cell Function Assay, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) plot of phagocytosis pathway in macrophages derived from C5ar1 −/− mice and C5ar1 +/− mice. ( B ) Western blotting and immunofluorescence analysis showed C5aR1 protein levels in Cas9-sgControl, -sg C5ar1 THP-1 subclones. ( C ) Effects of C5aR1 deficiency on the macrophage phagocytosis of HCC-LM3 in the presence or absence of C5a stimulation. ( D ) Effects of different selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the macrophage phagocytosis of HCC-LM3 in the presence of C5a stimulation. ( E ) Reconstituted expression of WT and D282A mutant C5aR1 in C5aR1 KO THP-1 cells. ( F ) The effects of citalopram on macrophage phagocytosis in the absence of C5aR1 with reconstituted expression of C5aR1 WT or C5aR1 D282A . In all panels, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Values are presented as mean ± SD and compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multiple comparisons with Tukey’s method among groups. Data are representative of three independent experiments ( C, D, F ). Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands. Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Western Blot, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Mutagenesis
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Conformations of orthosteric binding sites in human (light blue) and mouse (orange) C5aR1. The conformation of human C5aR1 was obtained from the crystal structure (PDB id: 6c1q). The structure of mouse C5aR1 was predicted using the ColabFold (AlphaFold2) software. ( B ) The predicted binding modes of citalopram to human (light blue) and mouse (orange) C5aR1. The conformations of citalopram were shown in pink (binding mode 1) or deep green (binding mode 2) sticks. For mouse C5aR1, green sticks indicate residues set to flexible in the molecular docking process.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Software
Figure Legend Snippet: Model depicting the molecular mechanism by which citalopram inhibits the Warburg effect and promotes an anti-tumor response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the primary HCC microenvironment (left panel), C5aR1-expressing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) exhibit reduced phagocytic capacity and an anti-inflammatory state, which correlates with diminished CD8 + T cell anti-tumor immunity and HCC progression. Upon treatment with citalopram (right panel), the drug not only inhibits the glycolytic metabolism of cancer cells by targeting GLUT1 but also acts on C5aR1 expressed by TAMs, thereby enhancing macrophage-driven anti-tumor immunity. Additionally, citalopram induces a systemic immunostimulatory effect on CD8 + T cell functions through yet-to-be-identified serotonergic mechanisms. The dotted line indicates a causal relationship that has not been fully established through direct evidence.
Techniques Used: Expressing
![a , Illustration of the electrophysiology field potential recording setup. b , Ratio of field to volley from electrophysiology field potential recordings of dorsal hippocampus (HPCd) brain tissue slices in rats after 30-d early life AGE-rich diet (n=14 CTL tissue slices, n=15 AGE-rich tissue slices; 2-way repeated measures ANOVA with factors of diet group, fiber volley amplitude [repeated measure], and diet group × fiber volley interaction; P=0.04 diet group, P<0.0001 fiber volley amplitude, P=0.99 diet group × fiber volley amplitude). c , mRNA expression of complement component 3 (C3) in the HPCd (n=7 CTL, n=7 AGE-rich; unpaired two-tailed t-test, P=0.04). d , mRNA expression of complement component 5 (C5) in the HPCd (n=7 CTL, n=7 AGE-rich; unpaired two-tailed t-test, P=0.68). e , mRNA expression of C3aR in the HPCd (n=7 CTL, n=7 AGE-rich; unpaired two-tailed t-test, P=0.17). f , mRNA expression of <t>C5aR1</t> in the HPCd (n=8 CTL, n=7 AGE-rich; unpaired two-tailed t-test, P=0.16). g , Structures of the peptide required for complement system receptor activation and of AGEs elevated in the heat-treated diet. h , C5aR1 pERK 1/2 signaling in response to MG-H1, CML, and CEL (smoothed lines indicate nonlinear least squares fit for each treatment). i , C5aR1 Receptor-G protein-Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (RG-BRET) assay for binding affinities between C5a and MG-H1, CML, CEL, or the C5aR1-selective antagonist avacopan (smoothed lines indicate nonlinear least squares fit for each treatment). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). *P<0.05. All n’s indicate number of rats or slices per group. Additional details about the statistical analyses for each subpanel can be found in . AGE, advanced glycation end-product; ANOVA, analysis of variance; C3, complement component 3; C3aR, receptor for complement component 3a; C5, complement component 5; C5aR1, receptor for complement component 5a; CA1, Cornu Ammonis subfield 1; CA3, Cornu Ammonis subfield 3; EC, entorhinal cortex; CEL, carboxyethyllysine; CML, carboxymethyllysine; CTL, control [diet]; HPCd, dorsal hippocampus; MG-H1, methylglyoxal-derived hydroimidazolone; pERK, phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PN, postnatal day; RG-BRET, Receptor-G protein-Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer.](https://bio-rxiv-images-cdn.bioz.com/dois_ending_with_65/10__64898_slash_2026__01__07__698065/10__64898_slash_2026__01__07__698065___F3.large.jpg)

