Review





Similar Products

94
ATCC yumm5 2 braf v600e p53 mouse melanomas
Higher interferon-regulated gene expression in metastasizing melanoma cells and increased formation of metastatic tumors after interferon treatment. a, We performed RNA sequencing on patient-derived xenograft cells (M405 and M481) isolated by flow cytometry from subcutaneous tumors, the blood, and metastatic tumors in NSG mice. After eliminating cell cycle-related genes, the 10 most significantly enriched gene sets in melanoma cells from the blood included ‘viral genome replication’ (red), which contains interferon-regulated genes. b, Interferon-regulated genes were more highly expressed by circulating (CMC) and metastatic as compared to primary subcutaneous (SQ) melanoma cells by gene set variation analysis (“Response to type I interferon” gene set). c-e, By qRT-PCR, transcript levels for the interferon-regulated genes ISG15, IFI27 and IFITM3 were higher in melanoma cells isolated from the blood as compared to subcutaneous or metastatic tumors of xenografted mice (two to three independent experiments per melanoma with a total of 3-5 mice per melanoma). f, Luciferase-expressing human melanoma cells were cultured overnight in 10 ng/mL hIFNa2 or vehicle and then intravenously injected into NSG mice. Metastatic disease burden was assessed five to nine weeks later by bioluminescence imaging of visceral organs and normalized to controls (two experiments per melanoma with a total of nine to ten mice per melanoma). g-j, Luciferase-expressing YUMM1.7, YUMM3.3, <t>or</t> <t>YUMM5.2</t> mouse melanoma cells were cultured overnight in 10 ng/mL mIFN51, mIFNa2, mIFNy , or vehicle control and then injected subcutaneously (g, i) or intravenously (h, j) into NSG (g-h) or C57BL mice (i-j). We observed no differences in subcutaneous tumor growth (representative data are shown for YUMM1.7 cells; g, i). Interferon-treated mice gave rise to significantly higher tumor burden after intravenous injection into C57BL but not NSG mice (two independent experiments with a total of 9-20 mice per melanoma). k-n, IFNAR mutant or control mouse melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously (k, m) or intravenously (l, n) into NSG (k, l) or C57BL mice (m, n). IFNAR mutant and control cells did not differ in the size of the subcutaneous tumors they formed in NSG (k) or C57BL (m) mice (one experiment using YUMM1.7 cells is shown for each mouse strain, representative of 2 to 3 independent experiments for each of 3 melanomas). IFNAR mutant cells generally gave rise to fewer tumors in visceral organs than control cells after intravenous injection in NSG (l) and C57BL (n) mice, though the difference was much greater in C57BL mice. For each melanoma, two control clones and three independently-targeted IFNAR1 mutant clones were studied in two to four independent experiments per melanoma with a total of 10-25 mice per melanoma. Each dot represents a different mouse and all data represent mean ± s.d. Statistical significance was assessed using repeated measures one-way (c) or two-way ANOVAs (d-e) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons adjustments (c-e), Mann-Whitney tests followed by Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons adjustments (f, Y3.3 and Y5.2 of h and j, l, and n), nparLD tests (g, i, k, and m) followed by FDR multiple comparisons adjustments (g and i), or Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparisons adjustments (for Y1.7 of h and j). All statistical tests were two-sided. No statistically significant differences were observed in f, g-i, k, or m.
Yumm5 2 Braf V600e P53 Mouse Melanomas, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/yumm5 2 braf v600e p53 mouse melanomas/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
yumm5 2 braf v600e p53 mouse melanomas - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bioss b raf proto oncogene serine threonine protein kinase braf
Overexpression of CRAF activates the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was used to analyze the mRNA expression of (A) ARAF, (B) <t>BRAF,</t> (C) CRAF, (D) MEK1, (E) MEK2, (F) ERK1and (G) ERK2. Western blotting was used to analyze the protein levels of (H) ARAF, (I) BRAF, (J) CRAF, (K) MEK1/2, (L) p-MEK1/2, (M) p-MEK1/2 to MEK1/2, (N) ERK1/2, (O) p-ERK1/2 and (P) p-ERK1/2 to ERK1/2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. p-, phosphorylated; OE, overexpression; NC, negative control; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; ARAF, <t>A-Raf</t> <t>proto-oncogene</t> <t>serine/threonine-protein</t> kinase; <t>BRAF,</t> <t>B-Raf</t> proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase.
B Raf Proto Oncogene Serine Threonine Protein Kinase Braf, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/b raf proto oncogene serine threonine protein kinase braf/product/Bioss
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b raf proto oncogene serine threonine protein kinase braf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p braf
JD-02 inhibits HSV-1 replication by suppressing the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. (A) Western blot analysis was conducted to assess the effects of HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) infection on the protein levels of <t>BRAF,</t> MEK and ERK, with and without treatment using JD-02. (B) Treatment with JD-02 at the specified concentration influences the protein levels of BRAF, MEK and ERK in HaCaT cells over a 12-h period. (C and D) HaCaT cells were subjected to transfection with either N.C. siRNA or ERK siRNA for a period of 48 h. Subsequently, the cells were infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) for an additional 24 h. The DNA copy number of the viral gene UL54, as well as the viral protein expression of gB, ICP0, ICP27, ERK and p-ERK were evaluated. (E) The DNA copy numbers of the viral genes UL30 , UL52 and UL54 in HaCaT cells infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) and subsequently treated with either JD-02 (1 μ M) or U0126 (10 μ M) for 24 h, were quantified using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. (F) Western blot analysis of viral proteins (gB, ICP0 and ICP27), ERK and p-ERK expression in HaCaT cell infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) and treated with U0126 for indicated concentration. (G) Western blot analysis of UL30 overexpression in HaCaT cells treated with U0126. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=3). * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.01 and **** P<0.0001 compared with the HSV-1 group. HSV, Herpes Simplex Virus; MOI, multiplicity of infection; N.C., negative control; siRNA, small interfering RNA; p-, phosphorylated.
P Braf, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p braf/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p braf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Eurobio anti braf antibody
RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early <t>BRAF</t> V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. <t>(B)</t> <t>Immunohistochemistry</t> with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Anti Braf Antibody, supplied by Eurobio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti braf antibody/product/Eurobio
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti braf antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Huabio Inc braf
RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early <t>BRAF</t> V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. <t>(B)</t> <t>Immunohistochemistry</t> with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Braf, supplied by Huabio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/braf/product/Huabio Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
braf - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Antech Diagnostics cadet braf plus
RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early <t>BRAF</t> V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. <t>(B)</t> <t>Immunohistochemistry</t> with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Cadet Braf Plus, supplied by Antech Diagnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cadet braf plus/product/Antech Diagnostics
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cadet braf plus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Omics Data Automation braf phosphosites
RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early <t>BRAF</t> V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. <t>(B)</t> <t>Immunohistochemistry</t> with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Braf Phosphosites, supplied by Omics Data Automation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/braf phosphosites/product/Omics Data Automation
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
braf phosphosites - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc braf v600e ires venus
RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early <t>BRAF</t> V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. <t>(B)</t> <t>Immunohistochemistry</t> with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Braf V600e Ires Venus, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/braf v600e ires venus/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
braf v600e ires venus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Higher interferon-regulated gene expression in metastasizing melanoma cells and increased formation of metastatic tumors after interferon treatment. a, We performed RNA sequencing on patient-derived xenograft cells (M405 and M481) isolated by flow cytometry from subcutaneous tumors, the blood, and metastatic tumors in NSG mice. After eliminating cell cycle-related genes, the 10 most significantly enriched gene sets in melanoma cells from the blood included ‘viral genome replication’ (red), which contains interferon-regulated genes. b, Interferon-regulated genes were more highly expressed by circulating (CMC) and metastatic as compared to primary subcutaneous (SQ) melanoma cells by gene set variation analysis (“Response to type I interferon” gene set). c-e, By qRT-PCR, transcript levels for the interferon-regulated genes ISG15, IFI27 and IFITM3 were higher in melanoma cells isolated from the blood as compared to subcutaneous or metastatic tumors of xenografted mice (two to three independent experiments per melanoma with a total of 3-5 mice per melanoma). f, Luciferase-expressing human melanoma cells were cultured overnight in 10 ng/mL hIFNa2 or vehicle and then intravenously injected into NSG mice. Metastatic disease burden was assessed five to nine weeks later by bioluminescence imaging of visceral organs and normalized to controls (two experiments per melanoma with a total of nine to ten mice per melanoma). g-j, Luciferase-expressing YUMM1.7, YUMM3.3, or YUMM5.2 mouse melanoma cells were cultured overnight in 10 ng/mL mIFN51, mIFNa2, mIFNy , or vehicle control and then injected subcutaneously (g, i) or intravenously (h, j) into NSG (g-h) or C57BL mice (i-j). We observed no differences in subcutaneous tumor growth (representative data are shown for YUMM1.7 cells; g, i). Interferon-treated mice gave rise to significantly higher tumor burden after intravenous injection into C57BL but not NSG mice (two independent experiments with a total of 9-20 mice per melanoma). k-n, IFNAR mutant or control mouse melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously (k, m) or intravenously (l, n) into NSG (k, l) or C57BL mice (m, n). IFNAR mutant and control cells did not differ in the size of the subcutaneous tumors they formed in NSG (k) or C57BL (m) mice (one experiment using YUMM1.7 cells is shown for each mouse strain, representative of 2 to 3 independent experiments for each of 3 melanomas). IFNAR mutant cells generally gave rise to fewer tumors in visceral organs than control cells after intravenous injection in NSG (l) and C57BL (n) mice, though the difference was much greater in C57BL mice. For each melanoma, two control clones and three independently-targeted IFNAR1 mutant clones were studied in two to four independent experiments per melanoma with a total of 10-25 mice per melanoma. Each dot represents a different mouse and all data represent mean ± s.d. Statistical significance was assessed using repeated measures one-way (c) or two-way ANOVAs (d-e) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons adjustments (c-e), Mann-Whitney tests followed by Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons adjustments (f, Y3.3 and Y5.2 of h and j, l, and n), nparLD tests (g, i, k, and m) followed by FDR multiple comparisons adjustments (g and i), or Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparisons adjustments (for Y1.7 of h and j). All statistical tests were two-sided. No statistically significant differences were observed in f, g-i, k, or m.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Sustained interferon exposure creates a hyper-metastatic subset of melanoma cells

doi: 10.64898/2026.04.01.715921

Figure Lengend Snippet: Higher interferon-regulated gene expression in metastasizing melanoma cells and increased formation of metastatic tumors after interferon treatment. a, We performed RNA sequencing on patient-derived xenograft cells (M405 and M481) isolated by flow cytometry from subcutaneous tumors, the blood, and metastatic tumors in NSG mice. After eliminating cell cycle-related genes, the 10 most significantly enriched gene sets in melanoma cells from the blood included ‘viral genome replication’ (red), which contains interferon-regulated genes. b, Interferon-regulated genes were more highly expressed by circulating (CMC) and metastatic as compared to primary subcutaneous (SQ) melanoma cells by gene set variation analysis (“Response to type I interferon” gene set). c-e, By qRT-PCR, transcript levels for the interferon-regulated genes ISG15, IFI27 and IFITM3 were higher in melanoma cells isolated from the blood as compared to subcutaneous or metastatic tumors of xenografted mice (two to three independent experiments per melanoma with a total of 3-5 mice per melanoma). f, Luciferase-expressing human melanoma cells were cultured overnight in 10 ng/mL hIFNa2 or vehicle and then intravenously injected into NSG mice. Metastatic disease burden was assessed five to nine weeks later by bioluminescence imaging of visceral organs and normalized to controls (two experiments per melanoma with a total of nine to ten mice per melanoma). g-j, Luciferase-expressing YUMM1.7, YUMM3.3, or YUMM5.2 mouse melanoma cells were cultured overnight in 10 ng/mL mIFN51, mIFNa2, mIFNy , or vehicle control and then injected subcutaneously (g, i) or intravenously (h, j) into NSG (g-h) or C57BL mice (i-j). We observed no differences in subcutaneous tumor growth (representative data are shown for YUMM1.7 cells; g, i). Interferon-treated mice gave rise to significantly higher tumor burden after intravenous injection into C57BL but not NSG mice (two independent experiments with a total of 9-20 mice per melanoma). k-n, IFNAR mutant or control mouse melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously (k, m) or intravenously (l, n) into NSG (k, l) or C57BL mice (m, n). IFNAR mutant and control cells did not differ in the size of the subcutaneous tumors they formed in NSG (k) or C57BL (m) mice (one experiment using YUMM1.7 cells is shown for each mouse strain, representative of 2 to 3 independent experiments for each of 3 melanomas). IFNAR mutant cells generally gave rise to fewer tumors in visceral organs than control cells after intravenous injection in NSG (l) and C57BL (n) mice, though the difference was much greater in C57BL mice. For each melanoma, two control clones and three independently-targeted IFNAR1 mutant clones were studied in two to four independent experiments per melanoma with a total of 10-25 mice per melanoma. Each dot represents a different mouse and all data represent mean ± s.d. Statistical significance was assessed using repeated measures one-way (c) or two-way ANOVAs (d-e) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons adjustments (c-e), Mann-Whitney tests followed by Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons adjustments (f, Y3.3 and Y5.2 of h and j, l, and n), nparLD tests (g, i, k, and m) followed by FDR multiple comparisons adjustments (g and i), or Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparisons adjustments (for Y1.7 of h and j). All statistical tests were two-sided. No statistically significant differences were observed in f, g-i, k, or m.

Article Snippet: YUMM 1.7 ( Braf V600E/+ ; PTEN -/- ; Cdkn2 -/- ), YUMM3.3 ( Braf V600E/+ ; Cdkn2 -/- ), and YUMM5.2 (Braf V600E/+ p53 -/- ) mouse melanomas were obtained from, and authenticated by, the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

Techniques: Gene Expression, RNA Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Isolation, Flow Cytometry, Quantitative RT-PCR, Luciferase, Expressing, Cell Culture, Injection, Imaging, Control, Mutagenesis, Clone Assay, MANN-WHITNEY

Overexpression of CRAF activates the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was used to analyze the mRNA expression of (A) ARAF, (B) BRAF, (C) CRAF, (D) MEK1, (E) MEK2, (F) ERK1and (G) ERK2. Western blotting was used to analyze the protein levels of (H) ARAF, (I) BRAF, (J) CRAF, (K) MEK1/2, (L) p-MEK1/2, (M) p-MEK1/2 to MEK1/2, (N) ERK1/2, (O) p-ERK1/2 and (P) p-ERK1/2 to ERK1/2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. p-, phosphorylated; OE, overexpression; NC, negative control; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; ARAF, A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase.

Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports

Article Title: RUVBL1 and CRAF promote periodontal ligament stem cell osteogenic differentiation via the MEK/ERK signaling cascade

doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13881

Figure Lengend Snippet: Overexpression of CRAF activates the RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was used to analyze the mRNA expression of (A) ARAF, (B) BRAF, (C) CRAF, (D) MEK1, (E) MEK2, (F) ERK1and (G) ERK2. Western blotting was used to analyze the protein levels of (H) ARAF, (I) BRAF, (J) CRAF, (K) MEK1/2, (L) p-MEK1/2, (M) p-MEK1/2 to MEK1/2, (N) ERK1/2, (O) p-ERK1/2 and (P) p-ERK1/2 to ERK1/2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. p-, phosphorylated; OE, overexpression; NC, negative control; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; ARAF, A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase.

Article Snippet: The antibodies were as follows: GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. P30008M; Abmart Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.), A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (ARAF) (cat. no. bs-2251R), CRAF (cat. no. bs-23170R), MEK1/2 (cat. no. bs-1041R), phosphorylated (p)-MEK1/2 (cat. no. bs-3270R), ERK1/2 (cat. no. bsm-33232M), p-ERK1/2 (cat. no. bs-3016R; all BIOSS), RUVBL1 (cat. no. 74775; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), ERK1/2 (all 1:500; cat. no. bsm-33232M; BIOSS), B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (BRAF) (1:2,000; cat. no. ab33899; Abcam) and HRP-conjugated universal secondary antibody [cat. nos.

Techniques: Over Expression, Reverse Transcription, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Expressing, Western Blot, Negative Control

Overexpression of RUVBL1 activates the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was used to analyze the mRNA expression of (A) ARAF, (B) BRAF, (C) CRAF, (D) MEK1, (E) MEK2, (F) ERK1 and (G) ERK2. Western blotting was used to analyze protein levels of (H) ARAF, (I) BRAF, (J) CRAF, (K) MEK1/2, (L) p-MEK1/2, (M) p-MEK1/2 to MEK1/2, (N) ERK1/2, (O) p-ERK1/2 and (P) p-ERK1/2 to ERK1/2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. RUVBL1, RuvB-like AAA ATPase-1; p-, phosphorylated; OE, overexpression; NC, negative control; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; ARAF, A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase.

Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports

Article Title: RUVBL1 and CRAF promote periodontal ligament stem cell osteogenic differentiation via the MEK/ERK signaling cascade

doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13881

Figure Lengend Snippet: Overexpression of RUVBL1 activates the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was used to analyze the mRNA expression of (A) ARAF, (B) BRAF, (C) CRAF, (D) MEK1, (E) MEK2, (F) ERK1 and (G) ERK2. Western blotting was used to analyze protein levels of (H) ARAF, (I) BRAF, (J) CRAF, (K) MEK1/2, (L) p-MEK1/2, (M) p-MEK1/2 to MEK1/2, (N) ERK1/2, (O) p-ERK1/2 and (P) p-ERK1/2 to ERK1/2. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. RUVBL1, RuvB-like AAA ATPase-1; p-, phosphorylated; OE, overexpression; NC, negative control; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; ARAF, A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase.

Article Snippet: The antibodies were as follows: GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. P30008M; Abmart Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.), A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (ARAF) (cat. no. bs-2251R), CRAF (cat. no. bs-23170R), MEK1/2 (cat. no. bs-1041R), phosphorylated (p)-MEK1/2 (cat. no. bs-3270R), ERK1/2 (cat. no. bsm-33232M), p-ERK1/2 (cat. no. bs-3016R; all BIOSS), RUVBL1 (cat. no. 74775; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), ERK1/2 (all 1:500; cat. no. bsm-33232M; BIOSS), B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (BRAF) (1:2,000; cat. no. ab33899; Abcam) and HRP-conjugated universal secondary antibody [cat. nos.

Techniques: Over Expression, Reverse Transcription, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Expressing, Western Blot, Negative Control

ODN MT01 promotes osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs. (A) PDLSC proliferation and (B) ALP staining following treatment with varying concentrations of ODN MT01. (C) Osteogenic differentiation and (D) mineralization after the addition of ODN MT01 and osteogenic inducers. ALP staining was used to assess the effect of (E) CRAF and (F) RUVBL1 on osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs following the addition of ODN MT01 and osteogenic inducers. Alizarin Red staining was used to assess the effect of (G) CRAF and (H) RUVBL1 on the degree of mineralization of PDLSCs following the addition of ODN MT01 and osteogenic inducers. *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001. ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; PDLSC, periodontal ligament stem cell; ALP, alkaline phosphatase, RUVBL1, RuvB-like AAA ATPase-1; NC, negative control; OE, overexpression; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; OI, osteogenic induction; OM, ODN MT01.

Journal: Molecular Medicine Reports

Article Title: RUVBL1 and CRAF promote periodontal ligament stem cell osteogenic differentiation via the MEK/ERK signaling cascade

doi: 10.3892/mmr.2026.13881

Figure Lengend Snippet: ODN MT01 promotes osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs. (A) PDLSC proliferation and (B) ALP staining following treatment with varying concentrations of ODN MT01. (C) Osteogenic differentiation and (D) mineralization after the addition of ODN MT01 and osteogenic inducers. ALP staining was used to assess the effect of (E) CRAF and (F) RUVBL1 on osteogenic differentiation of PDLSCs following the addition of ODN MT01 and osteogenic inducers. Alizarin Red staining was used to assess the effect of (G) CRAF and (H) RUVBL1 on the degree of mineralization of PDLSCs following the addition of ODN MT01 and osteogenic inducers. *P<0.05 and ***P<0.001. ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; PDLSC, periodontal ligament stem cell; ALP, alkaline phosphatase, RUVBL1, RuvB-like AAA ATPase-1; NC, negative control; OE, overexpression; sh, short hairpin; ns, not significant; CRAF, C-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; OI, osteogenic induction; OM, ODN MT01.

Article Snippet: The antibodies were as follows: GAPDH (1:1,000; cat. no. P30008M; Abmart Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.), A-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (ARAF) (cat. no. bs-2251R), CRAF (cat. no. bs-23170R), MEK1/2 (cat. no. bs-1041R), phosphorylated (p)-MEK1/2 (cat. no. bs-3270R), ERK1/2 (cat. no. bsm-33232M), p-ERK1/2 (cat. no. bs-3016R; all BIOSS), RUVBL1 (cat. no. 74775; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), ERK1/2 (all 1:500; cat. no. bsm-33232M; BIOSS), B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (BRAF) (1:2,000; cat. no. ab33899; Abcam) and HRP-conjugated universal secondary antibody [cat. nos.

Techniques: Staining, Negative Control, Over Expression

JD-02 inhibits HSV-1 replication by suppressing the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. (A) Western blot analysis was conducted to assess the effects of HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) infection on the protein levels of BRAF, MEK and ERK, with and without treatment using JD-02. (B) Treatment with JD-02 at the specified concentration influences the protein levels of BRAF, MEK and ERK in HaCaT cells over a 12-h period. (C and D) HaCaT cells were subjected to transfection with either N.C. siRNA or ERK siRNA for a period of 48 h. Subsequently, the cells were infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) for an additional 24 h. The DNA copy number of the viral gene UL54, as well as the viral protein expression of gB, ICP0, ICP27, ERK and p-ERK were evaluated. (E) The DNA copy numbers of the viral genes UL30 , UL52 and UL54 in HaCaT cells infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) and subsequently treated with either JD-02 (1 μ M) or U0126 (10 μ M) for 24 h, were quantified using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. (F) Western blot analysis of viral proteins (gB, ICP0 and ICP27), ERK and p-ERK expression in HaCaT cell infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) and treated with U0126 for indicated concentration. (G) Western blot analysis of UL30 overexpression in HaCaT cells treated with U0126. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=3). * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.01 and **** P<0.0001 compared with the HSV-1 group. HSV, Herpes Simplex Virus; MOI, multiplicity of infection; N.C., negative control; siRNA, small interfering RNA; p-, phosphorylated.

Journal: International Journal of Molecular Medicine

Article Title: Novel Hsp90 inhibitor JD-02 inhibits HSV-1 infection via the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway

doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2026.5810

Figure Lengend Snippet: JD-02 inhibits HSV-1 replication by suppressing the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. (A) Western blot analysis was conducted to assess the effects of HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) infection on the protein levels of BRAF, MEK and ERK, with and without treatment using JD-02. (B) Treatment with JD-02 at the specified concentration influences the protein levels of BRAF, MEK and ERK in HaCaT cells over a 12-h period. (C and D) HaCaT cells were subjected to transfection with either N.C. siRNA or ERK siRNA for a period of 48 h. Subsequently, the cells were infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) for an additional 24 h. The DNA copy number of the viral gene UL54, as well as the viral protein expression of gB, ICP0, ICP27, ERK and p-ERK were evaluated. (E) The DNA copy numbers of the viral genes UL30 , UL52 and UL54 in HaCaT cells infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) and subsequently treated with either JD-02 (1 μ M) or U0126 (10 μ M) for 24 h, were quantified using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. (F) Western blot analysis of viral proteins (gB, ICP0 and ICP27), ERK and p-ERK expression in HaCaT cell infected with HSV-1 (MOI=0.1) and treated with U0126 for indicated concentration. (G) Western blot analysis of UL30 overexpression in HaCaT cells treated with U0126. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n=3). * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.01 and **** P<0.0001 compared with the HSV-1 group. HSV, Herpes Simplex Virus; MOI, multiplicity of infection; N.C., negative control; siRNA, small interfering RNA; p-, phosphorylated.

Article Snippet: These primary antibodies included ICP0 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab6513; Abcam), ICP27 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab53480; Abcam), gD (1:1,000; cat. no. ab6507; Abcam), gB (1:500; cat. no. sc-56987; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), Raf-B (1:500; cat. no. sc-166; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), p-BRAF (1:1,000; cat. no. 2696T; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), ERK (1:1,000; cat. no. 4695S; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p-ERK (1:1,000; cat. no. 4370S; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), MEK1/2 (1:1,000; cat. no. AF6385; Affinity Biosciences), p-MEK1/2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9154T; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), Flag (1:1,000; cat. no. 14793S; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), HA (1:1,000; cat. no. 3724S; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.).

Techniques: Western Blot, Infection, Concentration Assay, Transfection, Expressing, Reverse Transcription, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Over Expression, Virus, Negative Control, Small Interfering RNA

RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early BRAF V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. (B) Immunohistochemistry with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Journal: iScience

Article Title: RIPOR2 promotes multinucleation of melanoma cells downstream of the RAS/ERK oncogenic pathway

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115734

Figure Lengend Snippet: RIPOR2 is expressed in the melanocytes of an intermediate-grade melanocytic lesion Adjacent sections of an early BRAF V600E -positive intraepidermal melanoma. Dotted boxes are magnified in the adjacent images. (A) H&E stain shows tissue disorganization in the center of the section. (B) Immunohistochemistry with an anti-BRAF V600E antibody stains the mutated melanocytes and highlights the malignant lesion zone. (C) Immunofluorescence with antiSOX10. (D) Anti-RIPOR2 antibodies demonstrated that RIPOR2 is expressed in SOX10+ epidermal nests of BRAF V600E -positive melanocytes, suggesting that it is expressed in malignant melanocytes. The RIPOR2 staining is cytoplasmic. Blue corresponds to Hoechst nuclear staining in all panels. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Article Snippet: 3.5 μm thick paraffine sections were done from samples and staining was done on a Benchmark ULTRA immunohistochemistry automated system (Ventana, Roche Diagnostics), using the anti-BRAF antibody directed against the V600E mutant form (clone VE1, Eurobio Scientific), dilution 1:250, Optiview DAB detection (Ventana).

Techniques: Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Immunofluorescence