(box). Lines were drawn across the cells for linescan analysis, and representative lines drawn for a linescan are shown. (Right) Line scan analyses were generated using ImageJ software and are plotted as KCa3.1 (green line) and CaM (magenta line) fluorescence intensity (y-axis) vs. the length of the lines drawn across the merged cells (distance from the starting point of the line, μm, x-axis). Shown here are linescan graphs from three representative HD and HNSCC T cells, wherein the outmost KCa3.1 (green) peaks correspond to the cell membrane. Correspondence of the peaks for green (KCa3.1) and magenta (CaM) lines is indicative of their colocalization. (B) Comparison of KCa3.1 membrane expression in HD and HNSCC T cells. KCa.31 fluorescence intensities were measured at the cell surface (points corresponding to KCa3.1 fluorescence peaks on the cell membrane) in linescan plots (A) . The data were normalized to mean KCa3.1 fluorescence intensity measured in HD T cells. (C) Comparison of CaM membrane-associated expression in HD and HNSCC T cells. CaM fluorescence intensities were measured at the cell surface (points corresponding to KCa3.1 fluorescence peaks on the cell membrane) in linescan plots (A) . The data were normalized to mean KCa3.1 fluorescence intensity measured in HD T cells, which represents the proportion of CaM associated with membrane KCa3.1. For (B, C) , bars represent mean ± SEM for data from 108 points (corresponding to KCa3.1 fluorescence peaks in the linescans) analyzed in 18 cells from 3 HD, and 120 points analyzed in 20 cells from 3 HNSCC patients. (D) Interaction between KCa3.1 and CaM in cell membranes of HD and HNSCC T cells. Confocal images of representative cells from PLA experiments performed in HD (top) and HNSCC (bottom). Cells were incubated with rabbit anti-human CaM and mouse anti-human KCa3.1 antibodies, after which PLA probe–ligated secondary antibodies were then added and PLA was performed as described in Materials and Methods . Positive PLA signals showing single protein interactions between KCa3.1 and CaM are visualized as magenta fluorescent dots. Cell membranes are labeled with CD8 antibodies (green) and nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. (E) 3D views of the PLA dots (red) in relation to the nucleus (DAPI, cyan) and membrane (CD8, green) in a representative HD (left) and HNSCC (right) T cell. (F) Average PLA signals. PLA signals in the cell membranes of in HD and HNSCC T cells were quantified as number of dots per cell membrane and are represented as a box plot. The dots per cell membrane are reported as median (horizontal line), first (top box), and third quartiles (bottom box). Shown are values for 185 cells from 3 HD and 214 cells from 4 HNSCC patients. For (B, C) , significance was determined by Mann Whitney rank sum test, while the significance for (F) was determined by Student's t-test. " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Frontiers in Pharmacology
Article Title: A Compartmentalized Reduction in Membrane-Proximal Calmodulin Reduces the Immune Surveillance Capabilities of CD8 + T Cells in Head and Neck Cancer
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00143
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reduced association of KCa3.1 with CaM in HNSCC T cells (A) Linescan analysis of KCa3.1 and CaM association at the cell membrane. (Left) Magnified representative confocal images of HD and HNSCC T cells stained for KCa3.1 (green) and CaM (magenta) from the merged images in Figure S4 (box). Lines were drawn across the cells for linescan analysis, and representative lines drawn for a linescan are shown. (Right) Line scan analyses were generated using ImageJ software and are plotted as KCa3.1 (green line) and CaM (magenta line) fluorescence intensity (y-axis) vs. the length of the lines drawn across the merged cells (distance from the starting point of the line, μm, x-axis). Shown here are linescan graphs from three representative HD and HNSCC T cells, wherein the outmost KCa3.1 (green) peaks correspond to the cell membrane. Correspondence of the peaks for green (KCa3.1) and magenta (CaM) lines is indicative of their colocalization. (B) Comparison of KCa3.1 membrane expression in HD and HNSCC T cells. KCa.31 fluorescence intensities were measured at the cell surface (points corresponding to KCa3.1 fluorescence peaks on the cell membrane) in linescan plots (A) . The data were normalized to mean KCa3.1 fluorescence intensity measured in HD T cells. (C) Comparison of CaM membrane-associated expression in HD and HNSCC T cells. CaM fluorescence intensities were measured at the cell surface (points corresponding to KCa3.1 fluorescence peaks on the cell membrane) in linescan plots (A) . The data were normalized to mean KCa3.1 fluorescence intensity measured in HD T cells, which represents the proportion of CaM associated with membrane KCa3.1. For (B, C) , bars represent mean ± SEM for data from 108 points (corresponding to KCa3.1 fluorescence peaks in the linescans) analyzed in 18 cells from 3 HD, and 120 points analyzed in 20 cells from 3 HNSCC patients. (D) Interaction between KCa3.1 and CaM in cell membranes of HD and HNSCC T cells. Confocal images of representative cells from PLA experiments performed in HD (top) and HNSCC (bottom). Cells were incubated with rabbit anti-human CaM and mouse anti-human KCa3.1 antibodies, after which PLA probe–ligated secondary antibodies were then added and PLA was performed as described in Materials and Methods . Positive PLA signals showing single protein interactions between KCa3.1 and CaM are visualized as magenta fluorescent dots. Cell membranes are labeled with CD8 antibodies (green) and nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 10 μm. (E) 3D views of the PLA dots (red) in relation to the nucleus (DAPI, cyan) and membrane (CD8, green) in a representative HD (left) and HNSCC (right) T cell. (F) Average PLA signals. PLA signals in the cell membranes of in HD and HNSCC T cells were quantified as number of dots per cell membrane and are represented as a box plot. The dots per cell membrane are reported as median (horizontal line), first (top box), and third quartiles (bottom box). Shown are values for 185 cells from 3 HD and 214 cells from 4 HNSCC patients. For (B, C) , significance was determined by Mann Whitney rank sum test, while the significance for (F) was determined by Student's t-test.
Article Snippet: Activated CD8 + T cells from HDs and HNSCC patients were seeded on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with PBS + 0.2% Triton X-100, blocked with PLA blocking solution (Millipore Sigma) for 1 h, and stained with mouse anti-human KCa3.1 (Clone 6C1, Alomone labs) and rabbit anti-human CaM antibodies (clone SJ16-09, Novus Biologicals) diluted in antibody dilution buffer (Millipore Sigma) for 3 h at room temperature.
Techniques: Staining, Generated, Software, Fluorescence, Expressing, Incubation, Labeling, MANN-WHITNEY