Review



atto594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody  (Alomone Labs)


Bioz Verified Symbol Alomone Labs is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Alomone Labs manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Alomone Labs atto594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody
    Atto594 Red Rabbit Anti Glua1 Antibody, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agc-004-ar/pmc11252801__pnas__2317833121__sapp-59-10-16?v=Alomone+Labs
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atto594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Alomone Labs atto594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody
    Atto594 Red Rabbit Anti Glua1 Antibody, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agc-004-ar/pmc11252801__pnas__2317833121__sapp-59-10-16?v=Alomone+Labs
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atto594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Alomone Labs anti-glur1 (glua1) (extracellular)-atto fluor-594 antibody
    Anti Glur1 (Glua1) (Extracellular) Atto Fluor 594 Antibody, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agc-004-ar/custom%40agc-004-ar%4010%2E1101%2F2023%2E10%2E13%2E562231?v=Alomone+Labs
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-glur1 (glua1) (extracellular)-atto fluor-594 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Alomone Labs atto 594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody
    ( A - C ) Surface biotinylation was used to isolate endogenous surface (s) <t>GluA1</t> and sGluA2 in acute striatal slices derived from wildtype (WT) and Lrrk2 G2019S (GS) mice. A ) Representative Western blot images of sGluA1, sGluA2, and actin from dataset quantified in B and C . Scatterplot/bar graphs plot values normalized to WT ± SEM (n = 7 - 8 mice/genotype, 3 slices/mouse). Unpaired t test *p= 0.0492, compared to WT. D ) Confocal image of DARPP32-labeled (white) co-cultured SPN (left) and super-resolution, STED images (right) of dendritic processes. Punctate sGluA1 (magenta), sGluA2 (green) labeling (tagged prior to permeabilization) associates largely, but not completed with PSD95 labeling (blue). E and F ) Violin plots compare surface AMPAR area ( E ) and intensity ( F ) within masks defined by PSD95 labeling in SPNs. Unpaired t test, ****p<0.0001; ***p<0.0001; Mann Whitney test *p=0.04. n= 3 preps and 15 ROIs/genotype.
    Atto 594 Red Rabbit Anti Glua1 Antibody, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agc-004-ar/bio_rxiv__2023__10__13__562231-168-7-13?v=Alomone+Labs
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atto 594 red rabbit anti glua1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Alomone Labs d e v e lo p m e n t anti glua1
    ( A - C ) Surface biotinylation was used to isolate endogenous surface (s) <t>GluA1</t> and sGluA2 in acute striatal slices derived from wildtype (WT) and Lrrk2 G2019S (GS) mice. A ) Representative Western blot images of sGluA1, sGluA2, and actin from dataset quantified in B and C . Scatterplot/bar graphs plot values normalized to WT ± SEM (n = 7 - 8 mice/genotype, 3 slices/mouse). Unpaired t test *p= 0.0492, compared to WT. D ) Confocal image of DARPP32-labeled (white) co-cultured SPN (left) and super-resolution, STED images (right) of dendritic processes. Punctate sGluA1 (magenta), sGluA2 (green) labeling (tagged prior to permeabilization) associates largely, but not completed with PSD95 labeling (blue). E and F ) Violin plots compare surface AMPAR area ( E ) and intensity ( F ) within masks defined by PSD95 labeling in SPNs. Unpaired t test, ****p<0.0001; ***p<0.0001; Mann Whitney test *p=0.04. n= 3 preps and 15 ROIs/genotype.
    D E V E Lo P M E N T Anti Glua1, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/agc-004-ar/pm21865324-95-0-17?v=Alomone+Labs
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    d e v e lo p m e n t anti glua1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A - C ) Surface biotinylation was used to isolate endogenous surface (s) GluA1 and sGluA2 in acute striatal slices derived from wildtype (WT) and Lrrk2 G2019S (GS) mice. A ) Representative Western blot images of sGluA1, sGluA2, and actin from dataset quantified in B and C . Scatterplot/bar graphs plot values normalized to WT ± SEM (n = 7 - 8 mice/genotype, 3 slices/mouse). Unpaired t test *p= 0.0492, compared to WT. D ) Confocal image of DARPP32-labeled (white) co-cultured SPN (left) and super-resolution, STED images (right) of dendritic processes. Punctate sGluA1 (magenta), sGluA2 (green) labeling (tagged prior to permeabilization) associates largely, but not completed with PSD95 labeling (blue). E and F ) Violin plots compare surface AMPAR area ( E ) and intensity ( F ) within masks defined by PSD95 labeling in SPNs. Unpaired t test, ****p<0.0001; ***p<0.0001; Mann Whitney test *p=0.04. n= 3 preps and 15 ROIs/genotype.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Parkinson’s-linked LRRK2-G2019S derails AMPAR trafficking, mobility and composition in striatum with cell-type and subunit specificity

    doi: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562231

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A - C ) Surface biotinylation was used to isolate endogenous surface (s) GluA1 and sGluA2 in acute striatal slices derived from wildtype (WT) and Lrrk2 G2019S (GS) mice. A ) Representative Western blot images of sGluA1, sGluA2, and actin from dataset quantified in B and C . Scatterplot/bar graphs plot values normalized to WT ± SEM (n = 7 - 8 mice/genotype, 3 slices/mouse). Unpaired t test *p= 0.0492, compared to WT. D ) Confocal image of DARPP32-labeled (white) co-cultured SPN (left) and super-resolution, STED images (right) of dendritic processes. Punctate sGluA1 (magenta), sGluA2 (green) labeling (tagged prior to permeabilization) associates largely, but not completed with PSD95 labeling (blue). E and F ) Violin plots compare surface AMPAR area ( E ) and intensity ( F ) within masks defined by PSD95 labeling in SPNs. Unpaired t test, ****p<0.0001; ***p<0.0001; Mann Whitney test *p=0.04. n= 3 preps and 15 ROIs/genotype.

    Article Snippet: Cultured neurons were live-labeled with a direct-conjugated, ATTO-594 (red) rabbit anti-GluA1 antibody (1:100, Alomone AGC-004-AR, RRID:AB_2340944) for 15 min at room temperature.

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Western Blot, Labeling, Cell Culture, MANN-WHITNEY

    A ) Schematic outlines antibody feeding assay used to monitor GluA1 internalization in wildtype (WT) and Lrrk2 G2019S (GS) corticostriatal co-cultures (DIV16-18) and serves as a key for the colors used to show data. B and C ) Overlay images show labeled surface (s) GluA1 (green mask + red mask) and internalized (i) GluA1 (red mask only) signal contained within DARPP-32 labeled SPNs (shown at a reduced intensity to permit visualization of puncta. Masks were generated in Image J and magnification is shown in B. D - G ) Intensity distribution of green and red labeling along a 60 µm line scan. H ) Quantification of the internalization index of GluA1 receptors in WT and GS SPNs at 0 and 60 min (n = 12 - 16 cells, 3 preps/genotype). Two-way ANOVA (F ( , ) = 9.809, p = 0.0029), post hoc Šidák test **p = 0.0049.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Parkinson’s-linked LRRK2-G2019S derails AMPAR trafficking, mobility and composition in striatum with cell-type and subunit specificity

    doi: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562231

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A ) Schematic outlines antibody feeding assay used to monitor GluA1 internalization in wildtype (WT) and Lrrk2 G2019S (GS) corticostriatal co-cultures (DIV16-18) and serves as a key for the colors used to show data. B and C ) Overlay images show labeled surface (s) GluA1 (green mask + red mask) and internalized (i) GluA1 (red mask only) signal contained within DARPP-32 labeled SPNs (shown at a reduced intensity to permit visualization of puncta. Masks were generated in Image J and magnification is shown in B. D - G ) Intensity distribution of green and red labeling along a 60 µm line scan. H ) Quantification of the internalization index of GluA1 receptors in WT and GS SPNs at 0 and 60 min (n = 12 - 16 cells, 3 preps/genotype). Two-way ANOVA (F ( , ) = 9.809, p = 0.0029), post hoc Šidák test **p = 0.0049.

    Article Snippet: Cultured neurons were live-labeled with a direct-conjugated, ATTO-594 (red) rabbit anti-GluA1 antibody (1:100, Alomone AGC-004-AR, RRID:AB_2340944) for 15 min at room temperature.

    Techniques: Feeding Assay, Labeling, Generated

    A, C ) Bar graph/scatterplots comparing functional contribution of CP-AMPARs using ratios of EPSCs evoked in the presence/absence of NASPM in D 1 R ( A; Drd1tdTom+ ) and D 2 R ( C; Drd1tdTom- ) SPNs in WT and GS mice (P70 - P90) in acute slices through dorsal striatum. Bars are mean ± SEM (n = 11 cells, 5 - 6 mice/group, unpaired t test *p = 0.0122). Example traces ( B ) show AMPAR currents before (black) and after (lavender) bath application of NASPM (200µM, 10 min). D - G , Superresolution (tau-STED) images ( D, E ) and quantification ( F, G ) of synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors in 21 DIV WT and GS D 1 R SPNs expressing tdTomato (white, Drd1 Cre/+; Ai14 , in D, E, and used to segment D1R SPNs for F, G) and co-cultured with unlabeled cortical neurons of the same genotype. sGluA1 ( D , magenta, STED) and sGluA2 ( E , green, STED) puncta in relation to PSD95 labeled postsynaptic sites (blue, confocal). Circled zones are enlarged in the center panels. F, G ) Bar graph/scatterplots show synaptic ( F , within a mask defined by PSD95) and extrasynaptic ( G , outside a PSD95 mask) sGluA1 (lavender) and sGluA2 (green) nanoclusters in D 1 R SPNs. F : Unpaired t test **p = 0.0369; n = 16 ROIs/genotype). G : Unpaired t test ****p<0.0001; n = 16 ROIs/genotype. H - K ) Examples ( H ) and quantification ( I - K ) of FRAP experiments. (H) Time lapse confocal images pre- and postphotobleaching (dotted circles approximate ROIs) in WT and GS D 1 R SPNs labeled and co-cultured as above. Table ( I ) compares time constant, diffusion (D) and % mobile receptors. D was calculated using: D = 0.25 (r 2 /τ 1/2 ), where r refers to the bleach radius and τ 1/2 to the time constant 46 . Graph ( J ) plots normalized SEP-GluA1 fluorescence recov-ery in WT and GS neurons imaged every 2.5 s. Lighter shading is ± SEM. Two-way RM-ANOVA (F(89, 3115) = 17.79, **p < 0.001, n = 19-20 spines/genotype. Scatterplot ( K ) compares recovery of SEP-GluA1 intensity at T222.5 s time point relative to post-bleach in WT and GS D 1 R SPNs. One-way ANOVA (F(3, 70) = 24.15, p < 0.0001), post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test ****p<0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Parkinson’s-linked LRRK2-G2019S derails AMPAR trafficking, mobility and composition in striatum with cell-type and subunit specificity

    doi: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562231

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A, C ) Bar graph/scatterplots comparing functional contribution of CP-AMPARs using ratios of EPSCs evoked in the presence/absence of NASPM in D 1 R ( A; Drd1tdTom+ ) and D 2 R ( C; Drd1tdTom- ) SPNs in WT and GS mice (P70 - P90) in acute slices through dorsal striatum. Bars are mean ± SEM (n = 11 cells, 5 - 6 mice/group, unpaired t test *p = 0.0122). Example traces ( B ) show AMPAR currents before (black) and after (lavender) bath application of NASPM (200µM, 10 min). D - G , Superresolution (tau-STED) images ( D, E ) and quantification ( F, G ) of synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors in 21 DIV WT and GS D 1 R SPNs expressing tdTomato (white, Drd1 Cre/+; Ai14 , in D, E, and used to segment D1R SPNs for F, G) and co-cultured with unlabeled cortical neurons of the same genotype. sGluA1 ( D , magenta, STED) and sGluA2 ( E , green, STED) puncta in relation to PSD95 labeled postsynaptic sites (blue, confocal). Circled zones are enlarged in the center panels. F, G ) Bar graph/scatterplots show synaptic ( F , within a mask defined by PSD95) and extrasynaptic ( G , outside a PSD95 mask) sGluA1 (lavender) and sGluA2 (green) nanoclusters in D 1 R SPNs. F : Unpaired t test **p = 0.0369; n = 16 ROIs/genotype). G : Unpaired t test ****p<0.0001; n = 16 ROIs/genotype. H - K ) Examples ( H ) and quantification ( I - K ) of FRAP experiments. (H) Time lapse confocal images pre- and postphotobleaching (dotted circles approximate ROIs) in WT and GS D 1 R SPNs labeled and co-cultured as above. Table ( I ) compares time constant, diffusion (D) and % mobile receptors. D was calculated using: D = 0.25 (r 2 /τ 1/2 ), where r refers to the bleach radius and τ 1/2 to the time constant 46 . Graph ( J ) plots normalized SEP-GluA1 fluorescence recov-ery in WT and GS neurons imaged every 2.5 s. Lighter shading is ± SEM. Two-way RM-ANOVA (F(89, 3115) = 17.79, **p < 0.001, n = 19-20 spines/genotype. Scatterplot ( K ) compares recovery of SEP-GluA1 intensity at T222.5 s time point relative to post-bleach in WT and GS D 1 R SPNs. One-way ANOVA (F(3, 70) = 24.15, p < 0.0001), post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test ****p<0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Cultured neurons were live-labeled with a direct-conjugated, ATTO-594 (red) rabbit anti-GluA1 antibody (1:100, Alomone AGC-004-AR, RRID:AB_2340944) for 15 min at room temperature.

    Techniques: Functional Assay, Expressing, Cell Culture, Labeling, Diffusion-based Assay, Fluorescence, Comparison