Review



anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mc) antibody  (Advisains)


Bioz Verified Symbol Advisains is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Advisains manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Advisains anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mc) antibody
    Anti 5 Methylcytosine (5 Mc) Antibody, supplied by Advisains, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 102 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ab73938/custom-ab73938-41752389?v=Advisains
    Average 99 stars, based on 102 article reviews
    anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mc) antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    Advisains anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mc) antibody
    Anti 5 Methylcytosine (5 Mc) Antibody, supplied by Advisains, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ab73938/custom-ab73938-41752389?v=Advisains
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-5-methylcytosine (5-mc) antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Abcam anti 5mc
    ( A ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA expression in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( B and C ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA levels at the indicated times in control and PCIF1-KO SCC9 ( B ) and SCC25 ( C ) cells after actinomycin D treatment ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( D and E ) TET2 expression ( D ) and DNA <t>5mC</t> and 5hmC modification levels ( E ) were detected in control and PCIF1-KO cells. ( F and G ) TET2 expression ( F ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( G ) were detected in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ). MB, Methylene blue. ( H ) Schematic diagram of TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutations. Red arrows denote A594G and A604G mutation. ( I ) Luciferase activity of TET2 5′-UTR WT or TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutation (5′-UTR MUT) in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ) ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( J and K ) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)–qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 ( J ) and anti-CTBP2 ( K ) antibody in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( L ) RIP-qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 antibody in CTBP2-KO cells transfected with vector (sgCTBP2), PCIF1 binding–defective mutant of CTBP2 (ΔCB-1), and WT CTBP2 ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
    Anti 5mc, supplied by Abcam, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ab73938/pmc10575729-342-11-12?v=Abcam
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti 5mc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Danaher Inc 5mc antibody
    ( A ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA expression in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( B and C ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA levels at the indicated times in control and PCIF1-KO SCC9 ( B ) and SCC25 ( C ) cells after actinomycin D treatment ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( D and E ) TET2 expression ( D ) and DNA <t>5mC</t> and 5hmC modification levels ( E ) were detected in control and PCIF1-KO cells. ( F and G ) TET2 expression ( F ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( G ) were detected in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ). MB, Methylene blue. ( H ) Schematic diagram of TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutations. Red arrows denote A594G and A604G mutation. ( I ) Luciferase activity of TET2 5′-UTR WT or TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutation (5′-UTR MUT) in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ) ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( J and K ) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)–qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 ( J ) and anti-CTBP2 ( K ) antibody in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( L ) RIP-qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 antibody in CTBP2-KO cells transfected with vector (sgCTBP2), PCIF1 binding–defective mutant of CTBP2 (ΔCB-1), and WT CTBP2 ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
    5mc Antibody, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ab73938/pmc10561724-301-6-8?v=Danaher+Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    5mc antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Abcam anti 5 methyl cytosine
    ( A ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA expression in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( B and C ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA levels at the indicated times in control and PCIF1-KO SCC9 ( B ) and SCC25 ( C ) cells after actinomycin D treatment ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( D and E ) TET2 expression ( D ) and DNA <t>5mC</t> and 5hmC modification levels ( E ) were detected in control and PCIF1-KO cells. ( F and G ) TET2 expression ( F ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( G ) were detected in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ). MB, Methylene blue. ( H ) Schematic diagram of TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutations. Red arrows denote A594G and A604G mutation. ( I ) Luciferase activity of TET2 5′-UTR WT or TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutation (5′-UTR MUT) in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ) ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( J and K ) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)–qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 ( J ) and anti-CTBP2 ( K ) antibody in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( L ) RIP-qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 antibody in CTBP2-KO cells transfected with vector (sgCTBP2), PCIF1 binding–defective mutant of CTBP2 (ΔCB-1), and WT CTBP2 ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
    Anti 5 Methyl Cytosine, supplied by Abcam, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ab73938/pmc10515045-297-10-12?v=Abcam
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti 5 methyl cytosine - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Danaher Inc methyl cytosine 5mc
    ( A ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA expression in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( B and C ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA levels at the indicated times in control and PCIF1-KO SCC9 ( B ) and SCC25 ( C ) cells after actinomycin D treatment ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( D and E ) TET2 expression ( D ) and DNA <t>5mC</t> and 5hmC modification levels ( E ) were detected in control and PCIF1-KO cells. ( F and G ) TET2 expression ( F ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( G ) were detected in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ). MB, Methylene blue. ( H ) Schematic diagram of TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutations. Red arrows denote A594G and A604G mutation. ( I ) Luciferase activity of TET2 5′-UTR WT or TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutation (5′-UTR MUT) in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ) ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( J and K ) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)–qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 ( J ) and anti-CTBP2 ( K ) antibody in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( L ) RIP-qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 antibody in CTBP2-KO cells transfected with vector (sgCTBP2), PCIF1 binding–defective mutant of CTBP2 (ΔCB-1), and WT CTBP2 ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
    Methyl Cytosine 5mc, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/ab73938/pmc10546472-121-9-14?v=Danaher+Inc
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    methyl cytosine 5mc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA expression in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( B and C ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA levels at the indicated times in control and PCIF1-KO SCC9 ( B ) and SCC25 ( C ) cells after actinomycin D treatment ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( D and E ) TET2 expression ( D ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( E ) were detected in control and PCIF1-KO cells. ( F and G ) TET2 expression ( F ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( G ) were detected in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ). MB, Methylene blue. ( H ) Schematic diagram of TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutations. Red arrows denote A594G and A604G mutation. ( I ) Luciferase activity of TET2 5′-UTR WT or TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutation (5′-UTR MUT) in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ) ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( J and K ) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)–qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 ( J ) and anti-CTBP2 ( K ) antibody in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( L ) RIP-qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 antibody in CTBP2-KO cells transfected with vector (sgCTBP2), PCIF1 binding–defective mutant of CTBP2 (ΔCB-1), and WT CTBP2 ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: The CTBP2-PCIF1 complex regulates m 6 Am modification of mRNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1172/JCI170173

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA expression in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( B and C ) Real-time qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA levels at the indicated times in control and PCIF1-KO SCC9 ( B ) and SCC25 ( C ) cells after actinomycin D treatment ( n = 3). P > 0.05 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( D and E ) TET2 expression ( D ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( E ) were detected in control and PCIF1-KO cells. ( F and G ) TET2 expression ( F ) and DNA 5mC and 5hmC modification levels ( G ) were detected in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ). MB, Methylene blue. ( H ) Schematic diagram of TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutations. Red arrows denote A594G and A604G mutation. ( I ) Luciferase activity of TET2 5′-UTR WT or TET2 5′-UTR m 6 Am site mutation (5′-UTR MUT) in SCC1 control cells and cells transfected with WT (OE) or mutant PCIF1 plasmid (OE mut ) ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( J and K ) RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)–qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 ( J ) and anti-CTBP2 ( K ) antibody in control and PCIF1-KO cells ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 2-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. ( L ) RIP-qPCR analysis of TET2 mRNA retrieved by anti-PCIF1 antibody in CTBP2-KO cells transfected with vector (sgCTBP2), PCIF1 binding–defective mutant of CTBP2 (ΔCB-1), and WT CTBP2 ( n = 3). P > 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

    Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% nonfat milk, the membrane was incubated with anti-5mC (Abcam, ab73938) and anti-5hmC (Proteintech, 40900) antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by secondary antibody.

    Techniques: Expressing, Comparison, Modification, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Plasmid Preparation, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Binding Assay

    ( A ) Experimental design of the carcinogen-induced HNSCC mouse model. Sac, sacrifice. ( B ) Diagram of Cre-dependent conditional knockout strategy for Pcif1. ( C ) Representative image of visible tongue lesions in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 1 mm. ( D ) Quantification of HNSCC lesion area in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( E ) Representative H&E staining of HNSCC in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 100 μm. ( F ) Quantification of HNSCC number of lesions in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( G ) Quantification of HNSCC tumor grade in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( H ) Representative PCK staining of metastatic lymph node in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 300 μm. ( I ) Quantification of metastatic lymph node percentage in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( J – L ) Representative dot blot image ( J ) and quantitative analysis of DNA 5mC ( K ) and 5hmC ( L ) modification levels in the indicated groups ( n = 3). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: The CTBP2-PCIF1 complex regulates m 6 Am modification of mRNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1172/JCI170173

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental design of the carcinogen-induced HNSCC mouse model. Sac, sacrifice. ( B ) Diagram of Cre-dependent conditional knockout strategy for Pcif1. ( C ) Representative image of visible tongue lesions in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 1 mm. ( D ) Quantification of HNSCC lesion area in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( E ) Representative H&E staining of HNSCC in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 100 μm. ( F ) Quantification of HNSCC number of lesions in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( G ) Quantification of HNSCC tumor grade in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( H ) Representative PCK staining of metastatic lymph node in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 300 μm. ( I ) Quantification of metastatic lymph node percentage in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( J – L ) Representative dot blot image ( J ) and quantitative analysis of DNA 5mC ( K ) and 5hmC ( L ) modification levels in the indicated groups ( n = 3). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

    Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% nonfat milk, the membrane was incubated with anti-5mC (Abcam, ab73938) and anti-5hmC (Proteintech, 40900) antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by secondary antibody.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Comparison, Staining, Dot Blot, Modification

    ( A ) Experimental design of the carcinogen-induced HNSCC mouse model. ( B ) Diagram of Cre-dependent conditional knockout strategy for Ctbp2. ( C ) Representative image of visible tongue lesions in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 1 mm. ( D ) Quantification of HNSCC lesion area in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( E ) Representative H&E staining of HNSCC in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 100 μm. ( F ) Quantification of HNSCC number of lesions in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( G ) Quantification of HNSCC tumor grade in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( H ) Representative PCK staining of metastatic lymph node in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 300 μm. ( I ) Quantification of metastatic lymph node percentage in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( J – L ) Representative dot blot image ( J ) and quantitative analysis of DNA 5mC ( K ) and 5hmC ( L ) modification levels in the indicated groups ( n = 3). ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: The CTBP2-PCIF1 complex regulates m 6 Am modification of mRNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    doi: 10.1172/JCI170173

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Experimental design of the carcinogen-induced HNSCC mouse model. ( B ) Diagram of Cre-dependent conditional knockout strategy for Ctbp2. ( C ) Representative image of visible tongue lesions in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 1 mm. ( D ) Quantification of HNSCC lesion area in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( E ) Representative H&E staining of HNSCC in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 100 μm. ( F ) Quantification of HNSCC number of lesions in the indicated groups ( n = 8). * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. ( G ) Quantification of HNSCC tumor grade in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( H ) Representative PCK staining of metastatic lymph node in the indicated groups. Scale bar: 300 μm. ( I ) Quantification of metastatic lymph node percentage in the indicated groups. * P < 0.05 by Pearson’s χ 2 test. ( J – L ) Representative dot blot image ( J ) and quantitative analysis of DNA 5mC ( K ) and 5hmC ( L ) modification levels in the indicated groups ( n = 3). ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.

    Article Snippet: After blocking with 5% nonfat milk, the membrane was incubated with anti-5mC (Abcam, ab73938) and anti-5hmC (Proteintech, 40900) antibody at 4°C overnight, followed by secondary antibody.

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Comparison, Staining, Dot Blot, Modification