Review





Similar Products

93
Addgene inc ptripz
Ptripz, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ptripz/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ptripz - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc ptripz m yfp ezh2 cat 82511
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Ptripz M Yfp Ezh2 Cat 82511, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ptripz m yfp ezh2 cat 82511/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ptripz m yfp ezh2 cat 82511 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc ptripz ezh2
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Ptripz Ezh2, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ptripz ezh2/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ptripz ezh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc hek 293t cells
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Hek 293t Cells, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hek 293t cells/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hek 293t cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc ezh2 gene ptripz m yfp ezh2
A Schematic representation of <t>EZH2</t> (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Ezh2 Gene Ptripz M Yfp Ezh2, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ezh2 gene ptripz m yfp ezh2/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ezh2 gene ptripz m yfp ezh2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc ptripz vectors
Exogenous ANO9 promotes proliferation of PANC-1 cells via ERK and EGFR activation. ( A ) Colony formation assay. After transduction <t>with</t> <t>lentiviral</t> particles containing doxycycline-inducible ANO9 <t>(pTRIPZ-ANO9),</t> PANC-1 cells that stably expressed ANO9 were selected by puromycin (5 μ g ml −1 ). Control (untransduced) or transduced PANC-1 cells were plated on 6-well plates (300 cells per plate), and the number of colonies was determined after 2 weeks. Results of multiple experiments are summarised in the bottom panel. Doxycycline treatment increased colony formation of PANC-1 cells transduced with the ANO9-expressing lentivirus but not that of untransduced cells (controls). ( B ) Protein levels of ANO9 and cell signalling proteins were determined in PANC-1 cells transduced with lentiviral particles containing doxycycline-inducible ANO9 after treatment with doxycycline for 1 week. Results of multiple experiments are summarised in the right panel. Overexpression of ANO9 increased protein levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), total EGFR, and phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR). ( C ) Immunoprecipitation assays were performed with anti-Myc antibodies in PANC-1 cells transfected with plasmids expressing HA-EGFR, Myc-ANO1, Myc-ANO5, Myc-ANO6, and Myc-ANO9. The results of four experiments are summarised in the right panel. EGFR showed the strongest association with ANO9 and only minimal association with ANO6. ( D ) Gene expression of ANO9 and EGFR was evaluated in PANC-1 cells by qPCR. ANO9 overexpression did not affect mRNA levels of EGFR. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. NS=not significant; * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.
Ptripz Vectors, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ptripz vectors/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ptripz vectors - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc ptripz m mcherry
Mitotic chromosomal association of PRC1 fusion proteins. (A–H) Confocal fluorescence images of PRC1 fusion proteins tagged with either YFP or Cerulean expressed in PGK12.1 ES cells in various phases of mitosis. The <t>mCherry-H2A</t> fusion protein was used to mark mitotic chromosomes. Prometaphase (top), metaphase (middle), and anaphase/telophase (bottom). Representative images from Z -scan stacks are presented in the figures. Scale bar, 5 μm. (I) Quantitative analysis of mitotic binding fraction of PRC1 fusion proteins at mitotic chromosomes. The mitotic binding fraction is the average of individual slices of Z -scan stacks. The data represent at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean.
Ptripz M Mcherry, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ptripz m mcherry/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ptripz m mcherry - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc vectors ptripz m
Mitotic chromosomal association of PRC1 fusion proteins. (A–H) Confocal fluorescence images of PRC1 fusion proteins tagged with either YFP or Cerulean expressed in PGK12.1 ES cells in various phases of mitosis. The <t>mCherry-H2A</t> fusion protein was used to mark mitotic chromosomes. Prometaphase (top), metaphase (middle), and anaphase/telophase (bottom). Representative images from Z -scan stacks are presented in the figures. Scale bar, 5 μm. (I) Quantitative analysis of mitotic binding fraction of PRC1 fusion proteins at mitotic chromosomes. The mitotic binding fraction is the average of individual slices of Z -scan stacks. The data represent at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean.
Vectors Ptripz M, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/vectors ptripz m/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vectors ptripz m - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A Schematic representation of EZH2 (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Schematic representation of EZH2 (Y641-F) and EZH2–ΔSET retroviral overexpression constructs. B Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control, stable EZH2 (Y641-F), and EZH2 (ΔSET) overexpressed (OE) 4T-1 cells. C Tumor growth curve is shown in control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, left to right * P = 0.0064, # P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0025, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. D Average weight of harvested tumors of Control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2–ΔSET OE groups depicted by the graph, ( n = 6) each group, data are represented as mean ± SD, * P = 0.0068, compared to control, one way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. E The body weight curve is shown for control, EZH2 (Y641-F) OE, and EZH2 –ΔSET OE; ( n = 5) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, E : left to right * P = 0.0102 and # P = 0.013, respectively, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F In vivo bioluminescence monitoring of orthotopic control (left panel), EZH2 (Y641-F) OE 4T-1 Luc2- GFP (middle panel) and EZH2 –ΔSET OE (right panel) primary tumor and distant metastatic sites. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/ sec) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), compared to control, ( n = 3) each group, data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0021, compared to control, two way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. H Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in time point manner (0, 12, and 24 h), magnification 10×. I The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay; * P = 0.0001 and * P = 0.0002, two-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2–ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells at 24 h. K The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 (Y641-F) OE and EZH2 –ΔSET OE 4T-1 cells in 24 h. * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. L Immunoblot analysis for UTX, EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells. M Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and UTX KD 4T-1 cells at 48 h. N The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and UTXKD 4T-1 cells at 48 h; * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). O Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, and GAPDH expression in control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells. P Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control, EZH2 OE , and EZH2 -EZH1 SET HCC1806 cells at 24 h. Q The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EZH2 OE and EZH2 -EZH1 SET cells at 24 h. * P = 0.0001, Student’s t -test (two-sided). R The 4T-1 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to analyze the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin by Immunoblot. S Representative images of trans-well chamber assay to analyze the invasion ability of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated 4T-1 cells. T The quantitative bar graphs of tans-well chamber migration assay of control and EPZ6438 (10 μM) at 48 h. * P = 0.0006, Student’s t -test (one-sided). In I , K , N , Q , and T , Columns are the mean of triplicate readings; error bar ± SD. P values are calculated as compared to the control. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Retroviral, Over Expression, Construct, Western Blot, Expressing, Control, In Vivo, Wound Healing Assay, Migration, Boyden Chamber Assay

A Schematic representation for generation of control Td-Tomato + and H3K27me3 High (Y641-F) GFP + 4T-1 cells by retroviral transduction (upper panel). The schematic delineation of different strategies used in the in vivo studies (lower panel). B , C Live fluorescence imaging of primary tumors and distant metastatic sites were shown under different strategies (described in Methods, Animal studies section). The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato- 570-620 nm and GFP-465-520 nm. D The fluorescence imaging of harvested control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) primary tumors at a specific wavelength (upper panel). The metastatic potential of control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells was analyzed by fluorescence imaging in the harvested organs at a specific wavelength (lower panel). E The fluorescence images of single-cell harvested from both tumors control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) and harvested organs ( n = 3). Scale bar 50 μm. F Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in primary tumors and metastatic organs harvested from mice ( n = 3). G The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in harvested primary tumors and metastatic organs ( n = 3), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0120 and # P = 0.00484, respectively, compared to Td-Tomato group, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. H Photomicrographs of H&E staining in the lung, liver, and spleen of control and Y641-F tumor-bearing mice. Scale bar 50 μm. I Photomicrographs of metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice under bright field (extreme left) and GFP fluorescence (middle left) panels, respectively. Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: GFP-465-520 nm. Colony formation assay was carried out in metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice, stained with crystal violet, and photo-micrographic images were taken under bright field (middle right) and inset (extreme right) panels. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Schematic representation for generation of control Td-Tomato + and H3K27me3 High (Y641-F) GFP + 4T-1 cells by retroviral transduction (upper panel). The schematic delineation of different strategies used in the in vivo studies (lower panel). B , C Live fluorescence imaging of primary tumors and distant metastatic sites were shown under different strategies (described in Methods, Animal studies section). The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato- 570-620 nm and GFP-465-520 nm. D The fluorescence imaging of harvested control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) primary tumors at a specific wavelength (upper panel). The metastatic potential of control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells was analyzed by fluorescence imaging in the harvested organs at a specific wavelength (lower panel). E The fluorescence images of single-cell harvested from both tumors control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) and harvested organs ( n = 3). Scale bar 50 μm. F Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in primary tumors and metastatic organs harvested from mice ( n = 3). G The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) cells in harvested primary tumors and metastatic organs ( n = 3), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0120 and # P = 0.00484, respectively, compared to Td-Tomato group, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. H Photomicrographs of H&E staining in the lung, liver, and spleen of control and Y641-F tumor-bearing mice. Scale bar 50 μm. I Photomicrographs of metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice under bright field (extreme left) and GFP fluorescence (middle left) panels, respectively. Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: GFP-465-520 nm. Colony formation assay was carried out in metastatic cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of Y641-F tumor-bearing mice, stained with crystal violet, and photo-micrographic images were taken under bright field (middle right) and inset (extreme right) panels. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Control, Retroviral, Transduction, In Vivo, Fluorescence, Imaging, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay, Staining, Isolation, Colony Assay

A The schematic representation of experimental planning. B The immunoblot analysis of EZH2, H3K27me3 expression in 4T-1 cells harvested from the primary tumor and metastatic organs; GAPDH was used as a loading control. C The in vivo imaging of mice having a primary tumor and splenic metastatic cell inoculation ( n = 5). The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. C Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0038, compared to the primary tumor, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. D The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mammary tumor onset in the nude mice with inoculation of the primary tumor and spleen metastatic cells (n = 6). * P = 0.0150, compared to the primary tumor, log-rank test. E Volcano plot represents the significant differential expression of genes between control and Y641-F cells. Red and blue dots represent the upregulated and downregulated genes with (Log 2 FC +1, −1, and p < 0.05), respectively. F Heat map of top 100 ranked genes differentially expressed between control and Y641-F phenotype. Expression values are represented as colors, where the range of colors (red, pink, light blue, dark blue) shows the range of expression values (high, moderate, low, lowest), respectively. G Heat map shows differential expression of cell migration and metastasis-related genes between control and Y641-F. H RNA was isolated from control and EZH2 Y641-F 4T-1 cells and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, *,# P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0134, $ P = 0.001, %,+,&,^ P = 0.0001, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. I RNA was isolated from 4T-1 cells isolated from the primary tumor, metastatic lung, liver, and spleen and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, left panel, * P = 0.0162, # P = 0.0101, X P = 0.0031, @ P = 0.0002, $ P = 0.0065, % P = 0.0039, + P = 0.0001, & P = 0.001, ^ P = 0.0001, right panel, * P = 0.0001, # P = 0.0009, @ P = 0.0001, $ P = 0.0088, % P = 0.0009 and + P = 0.0493, compared to isolated cells from primary tumors, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A The schematic representation of experimental planning. B The immunoblot analysis of EZH2, H3K27me3 expression in 4T-1 cells harvested from the primary tumor and metastatic organs; GAPDH was used as a loading control. C The in vivo imaging of mice having a primary tumor and splenic metastatic cell inoculation ( n = 5). The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. C Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI), data are represented as mean, error bar ± SD, * P = 0.0038, compared to the primary tumor, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. D The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of mammary tumor onset in the nude mice with inoculation of the primary tumor and spleen metastatic cells (n = 6). * P = 0.0150, compared to the primary tumor, log-rank test. E Volcano plot represents the significant differential expression of genes between control and Y641-F cells. Red and blue dots represent the upregulated and downregulated genes with (Log 2 FC +1, −1, and p < 0.05), respectively. F Heat map of top 100 ranked genes differentially expressed between control and Y641-F phenotype. Expression values are represented as colors, where the range of colors (red, pink, light blue, dark blue) shows the range of expression values (high, moderate, low, lowest), respectively. G Heat map shows differential expression of cell migration and metastasis-related genes between control and Y641-F. H RNA was isolated from control and EZH2 Y641-F 4T-1 cells and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, *,# P = 0.0001, @ P = 0.0134, $ P = 0.001, %,+,&,^ P = 0.0001, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. I RNA was isolated from 4T-1 cells isolated from the primary tumor, metastatic lung, liver, and spleen and subjected to real time-PCR for gene expression analysis. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, left panel, * P = 0.0162, # P = 0.0101, X P = 0.0031, @ P = 0.0002, $ P = 0.0065, % P = 0.0039, + P = 0.0001, & P = 0.001, ^ P = 0.0001, right panel, * P = 0.0001, # P = 0.0009, @ P = 0.0001, $ P = 0.0088, % P = 0.0009 and + P = 0.0493, compared to isolated cells from primary tumors, two way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, In Vivo Imaging, Quantitative Proteomics, Migration, Isolation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression

A Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 OE HCC1806 cells. B Control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by Immunoblot. C Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 EZH1SET HCC1806 cells. D The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and performed qPCR analysis for KRT14 expression. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, compared to control * P = 0.0001 and Y641-F # P = 0.0001, respectively, one-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. E The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. F The vehicle control and Tet-ON EZH2-YFP OE HCC1806 cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2 WT, EZH2-YFP, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. G The HCC1806 cells were treated either for vehicle control or 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 for the analysis of the expression of KRT14 by RT-qPCR. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, * P = 0.0001 compared to control cells, student’s t -test (two-sided). H The HCC1806 and MDAMB468 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to check the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. I HCC-1806 cells were treated with either vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 treatments for 24 h, co-stained with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) antibodies, and analyzed under a confocal microscope. Scale bar, 50 μm. J , K 4T-1 cells were isolated from primary tumors and metastatic spleen and subjected to confocal analysis after having either co-staining ( J ) with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) or single ( K ) staining with Ki-67 (red) antibodies. In both cases, DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Scale bar 20 and 5 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 OE HCC1806 cells. B Control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by Immunoblot. C Immunoblot analysis for EZH2, H3K27me3, β-actin in control, and EZH2 EZH1SET HCC1806 cells. D The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and performed qPCR analysis for KRT14 expression. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, compared to control * P = 0.0001 and Y641-F # P = 0.0001, respectively, one-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. E The control and EZH2 Y641-F cells were treated with a 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 and analyzed for expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. F The vehicle control and Tet-ON EZH2-YFP OE HCC1806 cells were analyzed for expression of EZH2 WT, EZH2-YFP, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. G The HCC1806 cells were treated either for vehicle control or 10 μM dose of EPZ6438 for the analysis of the expression of KRT14 by RT-qPCR. Data points are the mean of triplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, * P = 0.0001 compared to control cells, student’s t -test (two-sided). H The HCC1806 and MDAMB468 cells were either treated for a vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 to check the expression of EZH2, H3K27me3, KRT14, and β-actin by immunoblot. I HCC-1806 cells were treated with either vehicle or 10 μM EPZ6438 treatments for 24 h, co-stained with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) antibodies, and analyzed under a confocal microscope. Scale bar, 50 μm. J , K 4T-1 cells were isolated from primary tumors and metastatic spleen and subjected to confocal analysis after having either co-staining ( J ) with H3K27me3 (red) and KRT14 (green) or single ( K ) staining with Ki-67 (red) antibodies. In both cases, DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Scale bar 20 and 5 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Staining, Microscopy, Isolation

A Diagrammatic scheme showing the genomic location of the KRT14 gene for both mice and humans. B ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K27me3, p-Pol-II-S5, and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.5 to −0.2 kb of the KRT14 gene. C Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( B ). D , E The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were observed in −0.2 and −0.5 kb regions from TSS in control and EZH2-Y641-F cells by ChIP qPCR. F The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were analyzed in the −0.2 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. G ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K4me3 and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.1 to +2.4 kb of the KRT14 gene. H Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( G ). I The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 + 2.4 kb region from TSS in control and EZH2- Y641-F 4T-1 cells by ChIP qPCR. J The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 was analyzed in +2.4 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. B – F Columns, are the mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, B , C compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0158, # P = 0.0001, % P = 0.0003, $ P = 0.0001, & P = 0.0001 and @ P = 0.0004, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. D – F compared to control, left to right, * P = 0.0029, # P = 0.0025, $ P = 0.0022, & P = 0.0024, % P = 0.0036 and + P = 0.0134, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. G – I columns, a mean of duplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, G , H compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0023 and # P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparison test. I compared to VC, * P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. J Columns, a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, compared to VC, # P = 0.0082, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Diagrammatic scheme showing the genomic location of the KRT14 gene for both mice and humans. B ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K27me3, p-Pol-II-S5, and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.5 to −0.2 kb of the KRT14 gene. C Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( B ). D , E The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were observed in −0.2 and −0.5 kb regions from TSS in control and EZH2-Y641-F cells by ChIP qPCR. F The differential fold change enrichment for H3K27me3 and p-Pol-II-S5 were analyzed in the −0.2 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. G ChIP was performed in 4T-1 mouse cells using anti-H3K4me3 and IgG antibodies and then examined by real-time qPCR using primer pairs targeting −1.1 to +2.4 kb of the KRT14 gene. H Same procedure for HCC1806 human cells as in ( G ). I The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 + 2.4 kb region from TSS in control and EZH2- Y641-F 4T-1 cells by ChIP qPCR. J The differential fold change enrichment for H3K4me3 was analyzed in +2.4 kb region from TSS in the HCC1806 cells treated either with vehicle control or 10 μM EPZ6438. B – F Columns, are the mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bars, ±S.D, B , C compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0158, # P = 0.0001, % P = 0.0003, $ P = 0.0001, & P = 0.0001 and @ P = 0.0004, two way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. D – F compared to control, left to right, * P = 0.0029, # P = 0.0025, $ P = 0.0022, & P = 0.0024, % P = 0.0036 and + P = 0.0134, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. G – I columns, a mean of duplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, G , H compared to IgG control, left to right, * P = 0.0023 and # P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparison test. I compared to VC, * P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. J Columns, a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D, compared to VC, # P = 0.0082, two-way ANOVA, Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Control, ChIP-qPCR, Comparison

A , B The KRT14 knockdown was confirmed through immunoblot by using two different shRNA in 4T-1 and HCC1806 cells. The β-actin is used as a loading control. C – F Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and KRT14 KD in 4T-1 ( C ) and HCC1806 ( E ), magnification 10 ×. D , F The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay. Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bar, ±SD, * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. G – J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( G ) and HCC1806 ( I ) cells at 24 h. The quantitative bar graphs of the trans-well chamber migration assay of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( H ) and HCC1806 ( J ) cells are shown. Columns represent a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D. compared to control, $ P = 0.0002, % P = 0.0058, Student’s t -test (two-sided). K Fluorescence imaging of metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). The Td-Tomato fluorescence is for control cells, and GFP fluorescence is for KRT14 KD (left panel). Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato-570–620 nm and GFP-465–520 nm. L The quantitative analysis for the metastatic control (Td-Tomato +) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) cells harvested from the spleen ( n = 5, three different fields from each spleen), Columns, a mean of fifteen readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, & P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). M Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). N The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5) Columns, a mean of five readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, @ P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A , B The KRT14 knockdown was confirmed through immunoblot by using two different shRNA in 4T-1 and HCC1806 cells. The β-actin is used as a loading control. C – F Representative images of the wound healing assay to measure the migration ability of control and KRT14 KD in 4T-1 ( C ) and HCC1806 ( E ), magnification 10 ×. D , F The quantitative analysis of wound healing assay. Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples; error bar, ±SD, * P = 0.0001 and # P = 0.0001, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. G – J Representative images of the trans-well chamber migration assay to measure the invasion ability of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( G ) and HCC1806 ( I ) cells at 24 h. The quantitative bar graphs of the trans-well chamber migration assay of control and KRT14 KD 4T-1 ( H ) and HCC1806 ( J ) cells are shown. Columns represent a mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bars, ±S.D. compared to control, $ P = 0.0002, % P = 0.0058, Student’s t -test (two-sided). K Fluorescence imaging of metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). The Td-Tomato fluorescence is for control cells, and GFP fluorescence is for KRT14 KD (left panel). Scale bar 50 μm. The excitation and emission wavelength: Td-Tomato-570–620 nm and GFP-465–520 nm. L The quantitative analysis for the metastatic control (Td-Tomato +) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) cells harvested from the spleen ( n = 5, three different fields from each spleen), Columns, a mean of fifteen readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, & P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). M Representative flow cytometry-derived scatter plots showing control (Td-Tomato + ) and EZH2 Y641-F (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5). N The quantitative analysis of the percentage of Control (Td-Tomato + ) and KRT14 KD (GFP + ) metastatic cells harvested from spleen ( n = 5) Columns, a mean of five readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, @ P = 0.0001, compared to Td-Tomato, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Knockdown, Western Blot, shRNA, Control, Wound Healing Assay, Migration, Fluorescence, Imaging, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay

A Analysis of EZH2 and KRT14 transcript levels on the basis of ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 expression in different PAM50 subtypes represented in a heat map. Data are retrieved from the Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) data set, publicly accessible via XENA USSC Cancer Genome Browser. B Representative of heat map in the form of box and Whiskers plot for Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) PAM50 subtypes, Normal (Brown) n = 66, ESRI s.d. = 1.01, mean = −0.26, PGR s.d. = 2.35, mean = 0.474, ERBB2s.d. = 1.41, mean = −0.212, EZH2 s.d. = 0.80, mean = −0.505 and KRT14 s.d = 2.33, mean = 2.76. Luminal B (sky blue) n = 139, ESR1 s.d. = 0.39, mean = 0.071, PGR, s.d. = 2.44, mean = 0.155, ERBB2 s.d. = 1.36, mean = −0.420, EZH2 s.d. =1.20, mean=0.366, KRT14 s.d = 2.47, mean = −2.28.Luminal A n = 222, ESR1 s.d.=0.45, mean = −0.301, PGR s.d.= 2.27, mean=1.26, ERBB2 s.d.=1.43, mean = −0.195, EZH2 s.d. = 0.725, mean = −0647 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.80, mean = 0.752. HER+ n = 102, ESR1 s.d. = 1.70, mean = −1.842, PGR s.d. = 1.56, mean = −1.48, ERBB2, s.d. = 2.59, mean = 3.29, EZH2 s.d. = 0.78, mean = 0.303 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.79, mean = −1.906. Basal n = 170, ESR1 s.d. = 1.80, mean = −2.76, PGR s.d. = 0.791, mean = −1.54, ERBB2 s.d. = 2.50, mean = −1.18, EZH2 s.d. = 0.98, mean = 1.97 and KRT14 s.d. = 3.42, mean = 1.45. Whiskers for the plot signify SD and the bar denotes the mean for each subtype, where the box extends from 25th to 75th percentile, and whiskers range from minimum and maximum value, with the center denoting the median value. C Correlation plot showing IHC co-expression of the EZH2 and KRT14 in breast cancer TNBC subtype. Pearson pairwise correlation coefficient on 897 TNBC samples shows a positive correlation ( r = 0.10) between EZH2 and KRT14 and is significantly associated with each other ( p = 0.0018). D Immunohistochemistry was carried out to detect EZH2, H3K27me3, and KRT14 in FFPE serial sections of matched human TNBC primary tumor and respective metastatic counterparts using anti-EZH2, anti-H3K27me3, and anti-KRT14 antibodies. Representative photomicrographs were shown at 10X and 40X magnifications (inset). Scale bar, 200 μm (10×) or 50 μm (40×). E – G Quantitative H-scores for TNBC primary tumors and metastatic counterparts ( n = 10) were calculated for EZH2 ( E ), H3K27me3 ( F ), and KRT14 ( G ) expression and represented as scatter plots; error bar, ±SD, left to right * P = 0.0047, # P = 0.046, compared to expression in respective primary tumors, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Analysis of EZH2 and KRT14 transcript levels on the basis of ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 expression in different PAM50 subtypes represented in a heat map. Data are retrieved from the Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) data set, publicly accessible via XENA USSC Cancer Genome Browser. B Representative of heat map in the form of box and Whiskers plot for Breast Cancer (Yau 2010) PAM50 subtypes, Normal (Brown) n = 66, ESRI s.d. = 1.01, mean = −0.26, PGR s.d. = 2.35, mean = 0.474, ERBB2s.d. = 1.41, mean = −0.212, EZH2 s.d. = 0.80, mean = −0.505 and KRT14 s.d = 2.33, mean = 2.76. Luminal B (sky blue) n = 139, ESR1 s.d. = 0.39, mean = 0.071, PGR, s.d. = 2.44, mean = 0.155, ERBB2 s.d. = 1.36, mean = −0.420, EZH2 s.d. =1.20, mean=0.366, KRT14 s.d = 2.47, mean = −2.28.Luminal A n = 222, ESR1 s.d.=0.45, mean = −0.301, PGR s.d.= 2.27, mean=1.26, ERBB2 s.d.=1.43, mean = −0.195, EZH2 s.d. = 0.725, mean = −0647 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.80, mean = 0.752. HER+ n = 102, ESR1 s.d. = 1.70, mean = −1.842, PGR s.d. = 1.56, mean = −1.48, ERBB2, s.d. = 2.59, mean = 3.29, EZH2 s.d. = 0.78, mean = 0.303 and KRT14 s.d. = 2.79, mean = −1.906. Basal n = 170, ESR1 s.d. = 1.80, mean = −2.76, PGR s.d. = 0.791, mean = −1.54, ERBB2 s.d. = 2.50, mean = −1.18, EZH2 s.d. = 0.98, mean = 1.97 and KRT14 s.d. = 3.42, mean = 1.45. Whiskers for the plot signify SD and the bar denotes the mean for each subtype, where the box extends from 25th to 75th percentile, and whiskers range from minimum and maximum value, with the center denoting the median value. C Correlation plot showing IHC co-expression of the EZH2 and KRT14 in breast cancer TNBC subtype. Pearson pairwise correlation coefficient on 897 TNBC samples shows a positive correlation ( r = 0.10) between EZH2 and KRT14 and is significantly associated with each other ( p = 0.0018). D Immunohistochemistry was carried out to detect EZH2, H3K27me3, and KRT14 in FFPE serial sections of matched human TNBC primary tumor and respective metastatic counterparts using anti-EZH2, anti-H3K27me3, and anti-KRT14 antibodies. Representative photomicrographs were shown at 10X and 40X magnifications (inset). Scale bar, 200 μm (10×) or 50 μm (40×). E – G Quantitative H-scores for TNBC primary tumors and metastatic counterparts ( n = 10) were calculated for EZH2 ( E ), H3K27me3 ( F ), and KRT14 ( G ) expression and represented as scatter plots; error bar, ±SD, left to right * P = 0.0047, # P = 0.046, compared to expression in respective primary tumors, Student’s t -test (two-sided). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Expressing, Immunohistochemistry

A Immunoblot for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in Control and EZH2 knockdown (KD) 4T-1 cells. B – E Representative images of the wound healing ( B ) and trans-well chamber migration ( D ) assays in control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( C ) and trans-well ( E ) assay; Columns, mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, * P = 0.0453, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test and # P = 0.0467 student’s t -test (two-sided). F Bioluminescence image of tumor-bearing control (top panel), EZH2 KD (bottom panel) mice. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI). Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, $ P = 0.0010 compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. H Bioluminescence images of liver and spleen harvested from control and EZH2 KD tumor-bearing mice. I The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice cells ( n = 10), % P = 0.0001, compared to control, log-rank test. J – M Representative images of the wound healing ( J ) and trans-well chamber migration ( L ) assays in 4T-1 EZH2Y641-F (control) and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( K ) and trans-well ( M ) assay; Columns, a mean of duplicate ( K ) and triplicate ( M ) readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, & P = 0.0158, ^ P = 0.0219, X P = 0.0011, Y P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. N Representative bioluminescence images of EZH2 (Y641-F) 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice, treated with either vehicle or EPZ6438 (250 mg/Kg). O Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI); columns, a mean reading of triplicate samples, error bar, ±SD, Z P = 0.0078, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. P The bioluminescence analysis of the metastatic signal in the organs harvested from control (Y641-F) and EPZ6438 treated mice. Q The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of nude mice, either treated with vehicle control ( n = 5) or EPZ6438 (250 mg/kg) ( n = 5). @ P = 0.0326, compared to vehicle control, log-rank test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Immunoblot for EZH2, H3K27me3, and β-actin expression in Control and EZH2 knockdown (KD) 4T-1 cells. B – E Representative images of the wound healing ( B ) and trans-well chamber migration ( D ) assays in control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( C ) and trans-well ( E ) assay; Columns, mean of triplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, * P = 0.0453, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test and # P = 0.0467 student’s t -test (two-sided). F Bioluminescence image of tumor-bearing control (top panel), EZH2 KD (bottom panel) mice. The color scale indicated the photon flux (photon/s) emitted from each group. G Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI). Columns, a mean of quadruplicate readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, $ P = 0.0010 compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons tests. H Bioluminescence images of liver and spleen harvested from control and EZH2 KD tumor-bearing mice. I The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of control and EZH2 KD 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice cells ( n = 10), % P = 0.0001, compared to control, log-rank test. J – M Representative images of the wound healing ( J ) and trans-well chamber migration ( L ) assays in 4T-1 EZH2Y641-F (control) and EPZ6438 (10 μM) treated cells, 10× magnification. The quantitative analysis of wound healing ( K ) and trans-well ( M ) assay; Columns, a mean of duplicate ( K ) and triplicate ( M ) readings of samples, error bar, ±SD, compared to control, & P = 0.0158, ^ P = 0.0219, X P = 0.0011, Y P = 0.0001, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. N Representative bioluminescence images of EZH2 (Y641-F) 4T-1 tumor-bearing mice, treated with either vehicle or EPZ6438 (250 mg/Kg). O Quantitative bar graph representation of total photon flux calculated from the region of flux (ROI); columns, a mean reading of triplicate samples, error bar, ±SD, Z P = 0.0078, compared to control, two-way ANOVA, Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. P The bioluminescence analysis of the metastatic signal in the organs harvested from control (Y641-F) and EPZ6438 treated mice. Q The Kaplan–Meier survival curve of nude mice, either treated with vehicle control ( n = 5) or EPZ6438 (250 mg/kg) ( n = 5). @ P = 0.0326, compared to vehicle control, log-rank test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Control, Knockdown, Migration

Schematic representation of how catalytically hyperactive EZH2 (increased H3K27me3) can promote TNBC peritoneal metastasis and its therapeutic vulnerabilities against EZH2 inhibitor EPZ6438.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: EZH2-H3K27me3 mediated KRT14 upregulation promotes TNBC peritoneal metastasis

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35059-x

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic representation of how catalytically hyperactive EZH2 (increased H3K27me3) can promote TNBC peritoneal metastasis and its therapeutic vulnerabilities against EZH2 inhibitor EPZ6438.

Article Snippet: MSCV (cat# 24828), MSCV EZH2 ΔSET-Hygro (cat# 49403) EZH2-Y641-F (cat# 80077), pTRIPZ M)-YFP-EZH2 (cat# 82511), MSCV-EZH2OE (cat#75125), MSCV–EZH2 EZH1SET (cat#75126) were procured from Addgene USA.

Techniques:

Exogenous ANO9 promotes proliferation of PANC-1 cells via ERK and EGFR activation. ( A ) Colony formation assay. After transduction with lentiviral particles containing doxycycline-inducible ANO9 (pTRIPZ-ANO9), PANC-1 cells that stably expressed ANO9 were selected by puromycin (5 μ g ml −1 ). Control (untransduced) or transduced PANC-1 cells were plated on 6-well plates (300 cells per plate), and the number of colonies was determined after 2 weeks. Results of multiple experiments are summarised in the bottom panel. Doxycycline treatment increased colony formation of PANC-1 cells transduced with the ANO9-expressing lentivirus but not that of untransduced cells (controls). ( B ) Protein levels of ANO9 and cell signalling proteins were determined in PANC-1 cells transduced with lentiviral particles containing doxycycline-inducible ANO9 after treatment with doxycycline for 1 week. Results of multiple experiments are summarised in the right panel. Overexpression of ANO9 increased protein levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), total EGFR, and phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR). ( C ) Immunoprecipitation assays were performed with anti-Myc antibodies in PANC-1 cells transfected with plasmids expressing HA-EGFR, Myc-ANO1, Myc-ANO5, Myc-ANO6, and Myc-ANO9. The results of four experiments are summarised in the right panel. EGFR showed the strongest association with ANO9 and only minimal association with ANO6. ( D ) Gene expression of ANO9 and EGFR was evaluated in PANC-1 cells by qPCR. ANO9 overexpression did not affect mRNA levels of EGFR. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. NS=not significant; * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.

Journal: British Journal of Cancer

Article Title: ANO9/TMEM16J promotes tumourigenesis via EGFR and is a novel therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer

doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.355

Figure Lengend Snippet: Exogenous ANO9 promotes proliferation of PANC-1 cells via ERK and EGFR activation. ( A ) Colony formation assay. After transduction with lentiviral particles containing doxycycline-inducible ANO9 (pTRIPZ-ANO9), PANC-1 cells that stably expressed ANO9 were selected by puromycin (5 μ g ml −1 ). Control (untransduced) or transduced PANC-1 cells were plated on 6-well plates (300 cells per plate), and the number of colonies was determined after 2 weeks. Results of multiple experiments are summarised in the bottom panel. Doxycycline treatment increased colony formation of PANC-1 cells transduced with the ANO9-expressing lentivirus but not that of untransduced cells (controls). ( B ) Protein levels of ANO9 and cell signalling proteins were determined in PANC-1 cells transduced with lentiviral particles containing doxycycline-inducible ANO9 after treatment with doxycycline for 1 week. Results of multiple experiments are summarised in the right panel. Overexpression of ANO9 increased protein levels of phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), total EGFR, and phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR). ( C ) Immunoprecipitation assays were performed with anti-Myc antibodies in PANC-1 cells transfected with plasmids expressing HA-EGFR, Myc-ANO1, Myc-ANO5, Myc-ANO6, and Myc-ANO9. The results of four experiments are summarised in the right panel. EGFR showed the strongest association with ANO9 and only minimal association with ANO6. ( D ) Gene expression of ANO9 and EGFR was evaluated in PANC-1 cells by qPCR. ANO9 overexpression did not affect mRNA levels of EGFR. Data are presented as mean±s.e.m. NS=not significant; * P <0.05; ** P <0.01.

Article Snippet: To produce replication-incompetent lentiviral particles, pTRIPZ vectors containing ANO9 cDNA or shRNA against ANO9 were transfected into HEK293T cells together with the psPAX2 packaging plasmid (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, USA; 12260) and pMD2.G envelope (Addgene 12259); supernatants were collected 24 h after transfection.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Colony Assay, Transduction, Stable Transfection, Control, Expressing, Over Expression, Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Gene Expression

Mitotic chromosomal association of PRC1 fusion proteins. (A–H) Confocal fluorescence images of PRC1 fusion proteins tagged with either YFP or Cerulean expressed in PGK12.1 ES cells in various phases of mitosis. The mCherry-H2A fusion protein was used to mark mitotic chromosomes. Prometaphase (top), metaphase (middle), and anaphase/telophase (bottom). Representative images from Z -scan stacks are presented in the figures. Scale bar, 5 μm. (I) Quantitative analysis of mitotic binding fraction of PRC1 fusion proteins at mitotic chromosomes. The mitotic binding fraction is the average of individual slices of Z -scan stacks. The data represent at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean.

Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

Article Title: Cbx2 stably associates with mitotic chromosomes via a PRC2- or PRC1-independent mechanism and is needed for recruiting PRC1 complex to mitotic chromosomes

doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1109

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mitotic chromosomal association of PRC1 fusion proteins. (A–H) Confocal fluorescence images of PRC1 fusion proteins tagged with either YFP or Cerulean expressed in PGK12.1 ES cells in various phases of mitosis. The mCherry-H2A fusion protein was used to mark mitotic chromosomes. Prometaphase (top), metaphase (middle), and anaphase/telophase (bottom). Representative images from Z -scan stacks are presented in the figures. Scale bar, 5 μm. (I) Quantitative analysis of mitotic binding fraction of PRC1 fusion proteins at mitotic chromosomes. The mitotic binding fraction is the average of individual slices of Z -scan stacks. The data represent at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean.

Article Snippet: The sequences coding Cerulean (Addgene, Cambridge, MA), YFP ( Ren et al. , 2008 ), and mCherry (Addgene) fluorescence proteins were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pTRIPZ(M) to produce vectors pTRIPZ(M)-Cerulean, pTRIPZ(M)-YFP, and pTRIPZ(M)-mCherry.

Techniques: Fluorescence, Binding Assay

Directly recruiting PRC1 fusion proteins to mitotic chromosomes by YFP-Cbx2 but not by YFP-Cbx2 1-498 . (A) Confocal fluorescence images of Cerulean-Ring1b, Cerulean-Phc1, and Cerulean-Mel18 fusion proteins coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 and mCherry-H2A fusion proteins in Cbx2 −/− ES cells in metaphase. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Confocal fluorescence images of Cerulean-Ring1b fusion protein coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 1-498 and mCherry-H2A fusion protein in Cbx2 −/− ES cells in metaphase. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) Quantification of mitotic chromosomal association of YFP-Cbx2 and YFP-Cbx2 1-498 fusion proteins in Cbx2 −/− ES cells. The data represent an average of at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean. (D) Quantitative analysis of mitotic chromosomal association of Cerulea-Ring1b, Cerulean-Phc1, and Cerulean-Mel18 fusion proteins coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 and of Cerulea-Ring1b coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 1-498 in Cbx2 −/− ES cells in metaphase. The data represent an average of at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean. (E) Photobleaching FRET images of Cerulean-Ring1b interaction with YFP-Cbx2 and YFP-Cbx2 1-498 at mitotic chromosomes. The YFP-Cbx2, YFP-Cbx2 1-498 , and Cerulean-Ring1b fusion proteins as indicated above images expressed in Cbx2 −/− ES cells. Half-area of fluorescence of YFP-Cbx2 or YFP-Cbx2 1-498 fusion proteins at mitotic chromosomes was photobleached. Z -scan imaging of live cells by confocal laser microscope was performed before (top) and after (bottom) photobleaching. The arrowheads indicate the bleaching areas.

Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

Article Title: Cbx2 stably associates with mitotic chromosomes via a PRC2- or PRC1-independent mechanism and is needed for recruiting PRC1 complex to mitotic chromosomes

doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1109

Figure Lengend Snippet: Directly recruiting PRC1 fusion proteins to mitotic chromosomes by YFP-Cbx2 but not by YFP-Cbx2 1-498 . (A) Confocal fluorescence images of Cerulean-Ring1b, Cerulean-Phc1, and Cerulean-Mel18 fusion proteins coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 and mCherry-H2A fusion proteins in Cbx2 −/− ES cells in metaphase. Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Confocal fluorescence images of Cerulean-Ring1b fusion protein coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 1-498 and mCherry-H2A fusion protein in Cbx2 −/− ES cells in metaphase. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) Quantification of mitotic chromosomal association of YFP-Cbx2 and YFP-Cbx2 1-498 fusion proteins in Cbx2 −/− ES cells. The data represent an average of at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean. (D) Quantitative analysis of mitotic chromosomal association of Cerulea-Ring1b, Cerulean-Phc1, and Cerulean-Mel18 fusion proteins coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 and of Cerulea-Ring1b coexpressed with YFP-Cbx2 1-498 in Cbx2 −/− ES cells in metaphase. The data represent an average of at least 10 cells analyzed. Error bars, SD of the mean. (E) Photobleaching FRET images of Cerulean-Ring1b interaction with YFP-Cbx2 and YFP-Cbx2 1-498 at mitotic chromosomes. The YFP-Cbx2, YFP-Cbx2 1-498 , and Cerulean-Ring1b fusion proteins as indicated above images expressed in Cbx2 −/− ES cells. Half-area of fluorescence of YFP-Cbx2 or YFP-Cbx2 1-498 fusion proteins at mitotic chromosomes was photobleached. Z -scan imaging of live cells by confocal laser microscope was performed before (top) and after (bottom) photobleaching. The arrowheads indicate the bleaching areas.

Article Snippet: The sequences coding Cerulean (Addgene, Cambridge, MA), YFP ( Ren et al. , 2008 ), and mCherry (Addgene) fluorescence proteins were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pTRIPZ(M) to produce vectors pTRIPZ(M)-Cerulean, pTRIPZ(M)-YFP, and pTRIPZ(M)-mCherry.

Techniques: Fluorescence, Imaging, Microscopy

Analysis of structural elements of YFP-Cbx2 fusion protein required for its targeting and immobilizing. (A) Diagram of structural domains of Cbx2. The dashed rectangles indicate the region required for targeting Cbx2 to mitotic chromosomes (left) and the region required for immobilizing Cbx2 at mitotic chromosomes (right). ATH, AT-hook domain; Cbox, chromobox domain; CHD, chromodomain domain. The numbers in parentheses indicate the starting and ending of amino acid sequence. (B) Confocal images of YFP-Cbx2 and its variant fusion proteins in metaphase of HeLa cells. YFP-Cbx2 mutant and mCherry-H2A fusion proteins were stably expressed in HeLa cells. The mCherry-H2A was used to mark mitotic chromosomes. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) FRAP curves of interphases and metaphases of YFP-Cbx2 and its variant fusion proteins expressed in HeLa cells. FRAP analysis is described in . (D) Residence time and immobile fraction of YFP-Cbx2 variant fusion proteins at interphasic and mitotic chromatins. The residence time and immobile fraction were calculated from FRAP curves by fitting a first-order kinetic model.

Journal: Molecular Biology of the Cell

Article Title: Cbx2 stably associates with mitotic chromosomes via a PRC2- or PRC1-independent mechanism and is needed for recruiting PRC1 complex to mitotic chromosomes

doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-06-1109

Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of structural elements of YFP-Cbx2 fusion protein required for its targeting and immobilizing. (A) Diagram of structural domains of Cbx2. The dashed rectangles indicate the region required for targeting Cbx2 to mitotic chromosomes (left) and the region required for immobilizing Cbx2 at mitotic chromosomes (right). ATH, AT-hook domain; Cbox, chromobox domain; CHD, chromodomain domain. The numbers in parentheses indicate the starting and ending of amino acid sequence. (B) Confocal images of YFP-Cbx2 and its variant fusion proteins in metaphase of HeLa cells. YFP-Cbx2 mutant and mCherry-H2A fusion proteins were stably expressed in HeLa cells. The mCherry-H2A was used to mark mitotic chromosomes. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) FRAP curves of interphases and metaphases of YFP-Cbx2 and its variant fusion proteins expressed in HeLa cells. FRAP analysis is described in . (D) Residence time and immobile fraction of YFP-Cbx2 variant fusion proteins at interphasic and mitotic chromatins. The residence time and immobile fraction were calculated from FRAP curves by fitting a first-order kinetic model.

Article Snippet: The sequences coding Cerulean (Addgene, Cambridge, MA), YFP ( Ren et al. , 2008 ), and mCherry (Addgene) fluorescence proteins were amplified by PCR and inserted into the pTRIPZ(M) to produce vectors pTRIPZ(M)-Cerulean, pTRIPZ(M)-YFP, and pTRIPZ(M)-mCherry.

Techniques: Sequencing, Variant Assay, Mutagenesis, Stable Transfection