Review





Similar Products

96
Novus Biologicals anti 53bp1
Anti 53bp1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti 53bp1/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti 53bp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
novus biologicals NB100-304
Nb100 304, supplied by novus biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/NB100-304/product/novus biologicals
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
NB100-304 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Novus Biologicals novus biologicals nb100 304
Novus Biologicals Nb100 304, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/novus biologicals nb100 304/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
novus biologicals nb100 304 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals mouse 90 anti 53bp1 antibody
Mouse 90 Anti 53bp1 Antibody, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse 90 anti 53bp1 antibody/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse 90 anti 53bp1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti patm ser1981
Anti Patm Ser1981, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti patm ser1981/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti patm ser1981 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti 53bp1
Anti 53bp1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti 53bp1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti 53bp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Novus Biologicals mouse 53bp1
Mouse 53bp1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse 53bp1/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse 53bp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc 53bp1
RPA1 depletion and cisplatin sensitivity. A. Representative western blot of RPA1 knock down (KD) using siRNA in PEO4 cells. B. Clonogenic assay of cisplatin sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest Cisplatin dose was 18 %. C. Immunofluorescent analysis of <t>53BP1</t> and γH2AX in control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells untreated (UT) and treated with cisplatin (5 μM) for 24 hours. D. Quantification of 53BP1 nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. E. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. F. Cell cycle analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells G. Annexin V analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells. H. Representative western blot of RPA1 knock down (KD) using siRNA in A2780cis cells. I. Clonogenic assay of cisplatin sensitivity in control A2780cis and RPA1_KD_ A2780cis cells. A2780cis plating efficiency at the highest Cisplatin dose was 32 %. J. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. K. Cell cycle analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control A2780cis and A2780cis_RPA1_KD treated cells. L. Annexin V analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control A2780cis and A2780cis_RPA1_KD treated cells. UT = untreated cells; T = cisplatin treated cells. The experiment was performed for samples from three independent experiments (n=3) and the error bar represent the standard deviation (SD). ** p<0.01.
53bp1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/53bp1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
53bp1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


RPA1 depletion and cisplatin sensitivity. A. Representative western blot of RPA1 knock down (KD) using siRNA in PEO4 cells. B. Clonogenic assay of cisplatin sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest Cisplatin dose was 18 %. C. Immunofluorescent analysis of 53BP1 and γH2AX in control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells untreated (UT) and treated with cisplatin (5 μM) for 24 hours. D. Quantification of 53BP1 nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. E. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. F. Cell cycle analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells G. Annexin V analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells. H. Representative western blot of RPA1 knock down (KD) using siRNA in A2780cis cells. I. Clonogenic assay of cisplatin sensitivity in control A2780cis and RPA1_KD_ A2780cis cells. A2780cis plating efficiency at the highest Cisplatin dose was 32 %. J. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. K. Cell cycle analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control A2780cis and A2780cis_RPA1_KD treated cells. L. Annexin V analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control A2780cis and A2780cis_RPA1_KD treated cells. UT = untreated cells; T = cisplatin treated cells. The experiment was performed for samples from three independent experiments (n=3) and the error bar represent the standard deviation (SD). ** p<0.01.

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Clinicopathological and functional evaluation of replication protein A in epithelial ovarian cancers: A target validation study

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2026.102709

Figure Lengend Snippet: RPA1 depletion and cisplatin sensitivity. A. Representative western blot of RPA1 knock down (KD) using siRNA in PEO4 cells. B. Clonogenic assay of cisplatin sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest Cisplatin dose was 18 %. C. Immunofluorescent analysis of 53BP1 and γH2AX in control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells untreated (UT) and treated with cisplatin (5 μM) for 24 hours. D. Quantification of 53BP1 nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. E. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. F. Cell cycle analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells G. Annexin V analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells. H. Representative western blot of RPA1 knock down (KD) using siRNA in A2780cis cells. I. Clonogenic assay of cisplatin sensitivity in control A2780cis and RPA1_KD_ A2780cis cells. A2780cis plating efficiency at the highest Cisplatin dose was 32 %. J. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. K. Cell cycle analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control A2780cis and A2780cis_RPA1_KD treated cells. L. Annexin V analysis of UT and cisplatin (5 μM) treated control A2780cis and A2780cis_RPA1_KD treated cells. UT = untreated cells; T = cisplatin treated cells. The experiment was performed for samples from three independent experiments (n=3) and the error bar represent the standard deviation (SD). ** p<0.01.

Article Snippet: Briefly, the cells were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde (8187,085,000, Sigma Aldrich, UK) for 30 min, permeabilised with 300 μL per well of 0.1 % Triton (85,111, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) for 30 min, incubated with 3 % BSA (A7906, Sigma, UK) for 1 h, incubated with 300 μL of diluted primary antibody as follows; 53BP1 [clone:4937S, Cell Signalling, 1:200, overnight at 4°C], γH2AX [clone: JBW301, Sigma, 1:500, overnight at 4°C], Alexa-fluor 488 goat anti-Mouse secondary antibody [clone: A-11,029, 1:200 Thermo Fisher, 1 h at room temperature] and Goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody, TRITC [clone: T-2769, 1:500 Thermo Fisher, 1 h at room temperature].

Techniques: Western Blot, Knockdown, Clonogenic Assay, Control, Fluorescence, Cell Cycle Assay, Standard Deviation

RPA1 depletion and PARP inhibitor sensitivity in PEO4 cells. A. Clonogenic assay of talazoparib sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest dose of talazoparib was 10 %. B. Immunofluorescent analysis of 53BP1 and γH2AX in control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells untreated (UT) and treated with talazoparib (800 nM) for 24 hours. C. Quantification of 53BP1 nuclear fluorescence in UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. D. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. E. Cell cycle analysis in UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells F. Annexin V analysis of UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells. G. Clonogenic assay of olaparib sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_ PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest dose of olaparib was 13 %. H. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and Olaparib (6 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. I. Cell cycle analysis in UT and Olaparib (6 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD treated cells. J. Annexin V analysis of UT and Olaparib (6 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD treated cells. UT = untreated cells; T = talazoparib or olaparib treated cells. The experiment was performed for samples from three independent experiments (n=3) and the error bar represent the standard deviation (SD). ** p<0.01.

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Clinicopathological and functional evaluation of replication protein A in epithelial ovarian cancers: A target validation study

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2026.102709

Figure Lengend Snippet: RPA1 depletion and PARP inhibitor sensitivity in PEO4 cells. A. Clonogenic assay of talazoparib sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest dose of talazoparib was 10 %. B. Immunofluorescent analysis of 53BP1 and γH2AX in control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells untreated (UT) and treated with talazoparib (800 nM) for 24 hours. C. Quantification of 53BP1 nuclear fluorescence in UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. D. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. E. Cell cycle analysis in UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells F. Annexin V analysis of UT and talazoparib (800 nM) treated PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD cells. G. Clonogenic assay of olaparib sensitivity in control PEO4 and RPA1_KD_ PEO4 cells. PEO4 plating efficiency at the highest dose of olaparib was 13 %. H. Quantification of γH2AX nuclear fluorescence in UT and Olaparib (6 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4 _RPA1_KD cells. I. Cell cycle analysis in UT and Olaparib (6 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD treated cells. J. Annexin V analysis of UT and Olaparib (6 μM) treated control PEO4 and PEO4_RPA1_KD treated cells. UT = untreated cells; T = talazoparib or olaparib treated cells. The experiment was performed for samples from three independent experiments (n=3) and the error bar represent the standard deviation (SD). ** p<0.01.

Article Snippet: Briefly, the cells were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde (8187,085,000, Sigma Aldrich, UK) for 30 min, permeabilised with 300 μL per well of 0.1 % Triton (85,111, Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) for 30 min, incubated with 3 % BSA (A7906, Sigma, UK) for 1 h, incubated with 300 μL of diluted primary antibody as follows; 53BP1 [clone:4937S, Cell Signalling, 1:200, overnight at 4°C], γH2AX [clone: JBW301, Sigma, 1:500, overnight at 4°C], Alexa-fluor 488 goat anti-Mouse secondary antibody [clone: A-11,029, 1:200 Thermo Fisher, 1 h at room temperature] and Goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody, TRITC [clone: T-2769, 1:500 Thermo Fisher, 1 h at room temperature].

Techniques: Clonogenic Assay, Control, Fluorescence, Cell Cycle Assay, Standard Deviation